Vol. 143
Latest Volume
All Volumes
PIERC 150 [2024] PIERC 149 [2024] PIERC 148 [2024] PIERC 147 [2024] PIERC 146 [2024] PIERC 145 [2024] PIERC 144 [2024] PIERC 143 [2024] PIERC 142 [2024] PIERC 141 [2024] PIERC 140 [2024] PIERC 139 [2024] PIERC 138 [2023] PIERC 137 [2023] PIERC 136 [2023] PIERC 135 [2023] PIERC 134 [2023] PIERC 133 [2023] PIERC 132 [2023] PIERC 131 [2023] PIERC 130 [2023] PIERC 129 [2023] PIERC 128 [2023] PIERC 127 [2022] PIERC 126 [2022] PIERC 125 [2022] PIERC 124 [2022] PIERC 123 [2022] PIERC 122 [2022] PIERC 121 [2022] PIERC 120 [2022] PIERC 119 [2022] PIERC 118 [2022] PIERC 117 [2021] PIERC 116 [2021] PIERC 115 [2021] PIERC 114 [2021] PIERC 113 [2021] PIERC 112 [2021] PIERC 111 [2021] PIERC 110 [2021] PIERC 109 [2021] PIERC 108 [2021] PIERC 107 [2021] PIERC 106 [2020] PIERC 105 [2020] PIERC 104 [2020] PIERC 103 [2020] PIERC 102 [2020] PIERC 101 [2020] PIERC 100 [2020] PIERC 99 [2020] PIERC 98 [2020] PIERC 97 [2019] PIERC 96 [2019] PIERC 95 [2019] PIERC 94 [2019] PIERC 93 [2019] PIERC 92 [2019] PIERC 91 [2019] PIERC 90 [2019] PIERC 89 [2019] PIERC 88 [2018] PIERC 87 [2018] PIERC 86 [2018] PIERC 85 [2018] PIERC 84 [2018] PIERC 83 [2018] PIERC 82 [2018] PIERC 81 [2018] PIERC 80 [2018] PIERC 79 [2017] PIERC 78 [2017] PIERC 77 [2017] PIERC 76 [2017] PIERC 75 [2017] PIERC 74 [2017] PIERC 73 [2017] PIERC 72 [2017] PIERC 71 [2017] PIERC 70 [2016] PIERC 69 [2016] PIERC 68 [2016] PIERC 67 [2016] PIERC 66 [2016] PIERC 65 [2016] PIERC 64 [2016] PIERC 63 [2016] PIERC 62 [2016] PIERC 61 [2016] PIERC 60 [2015] PIERC 59 [2015] PIERC 58 [2015] PIERC 57 [2015] PIERC 56 [2015] PIERC 55 [2014] PIERC 54 [2014] PIERC 53 [2014] PIERC 52 [2014] PIERC 51 [2014] PIERC 50 [2014] PIERC 49 [2014] PIERC 48 [2014] PIERC 47 [2014] PIERC 46 [2014] PIERC 45 [2013] PIERC 44 [2013] PIERC 43 [2013] PIERC 42 [2013] PIERC 41 [2013] PIERC 40 [2013] PIERC 39 [2013] PIERC 38 [2013] PIERC 37 [2013] PIERC 36 [2013] PIERC 35 [2013] PIERC 34 [2013] PIERC 33 [2012] PIERC 32 [2012] PIERC 31 [2012] PIERC 30 [2012] PIERC 29 [2012] PIERC 28 [2012] PIERC 27 [2012] PIERC 26 [2012] PIERC 25 [2012] PIERC 24 [2011] PIERC 23 [2011] PIERC 22 [2011] PIERC 21 [2011] PIERC 20 [2011] PIERC 19 [2011] PIERC 18 [2011] PIERC 17 [2010] PIERC 16 [2010] PIERC 15 [2010] PIERC 14 [2010] PIERC 13 [2010] PIERC 12 [2010] PIERC 11 [2009] PIERC 10 [2009] PIERC 9 [2009] PIERC 8 [2009] PIERC 7 [2009] PIERC 6 [2009] PIERC 5 [2008] PIERC 4 [2008] PIERC 3 [2008] PIERC 2 [2008] PIERC 1 [2008]
2024-05-16
Machine Learning-Based Optimization of Hexagon-Shaped Fractal Antenna for Ultra-Wideband Communications
By
Progress In Electromagnetics Research C, Vol. 143, 121-129, 2024
Abstract
In the wireless communication industry, achieving gigabit-per-second data rates with low-profile, ultra-wideband (UWB) microstrip patch antennae poses a significant challenge. Conventional optimization algorithms, though effective, are often computationally expensive, particularly for complex antenna geometries with high degrees of freedom. There is an imperative need for new methodologies to address this challenge and revolutionize the antenna optimization process. Successful and timely development of antennas relies on the efficiency and computational speed of optimization algorithms, full-wave electromagnetic (EM) solvers, and the intuition of radio frequency engineers. To mitigate the dependence on complex and time-consuming processes, we propose an efficient machine learning (ML)-based antenna optimization methodology that minimizes optimization time by more than 90%. This paper aims to apply and study the performance of two specific ML models, the radial basis function (RBF) and the least squared regression (LSR) models, in the bandwidth optimization without increasing the aperture area of a hexagon-shaped fractal antenna. The hexagon-shaped fractal antenna was chosen for its UWB characteristics, low profile, and high degrees of freedom (10 adjustable parameters). The reflection coefficient response of a hexagon-shaped fractal antenna is predicted by the trained RBF and LSR models and further optimized by the genetic algorithm (GA). The proposed approach stands out among other notable works in this research domain, especially for ultrawideband (UWB) applications, by prioritizing the optimization of the mean of |S11| across the entire frequency range instead of solely targeting individual frequency points. The GA-based optimization using trained ML models has increased the bandwidth by 30.20% and reduced the computational time by 90% compared to conventional optimization without increasing the physical or electrical size of the antenna. Simulation and measurement results concurred with a maximum difference of 5%, demonstrating the efficacy of the ML approach for antenna optimization.
Citation
Sai Sampreeth Indharapu, Anthony N. Caruso, Travis D. Fields, and Kalyan C. Durbhakula, "Machine Learning-Based Optimization of Hexagon-Shaped Fractal Antenna for Ultra-Wideband Communications," Progress In Electromagnetics Research C, Vol. 143, 121-129, 2024.
doi:10.2528/PIERC24031308
References

1. Mohd Isa, Farah N., Nur H. Kamaludin, Norun F. Abdul Malek, and Sarah Y. Mohamad, "Compact UWB slotted pentagonal patch antenna for radar and communication," 2019 IEEE International Symposium on Antennas and Propagation and USNC-URSI Radio Science Meeting, 1393-1394, 2019.

2. Prasad, Pratyancha, Shivanand Singh, and Akhilesh Kumar, "A wheel shaped compact UWB antenna for GPR applications," 2021 6th International Conference for Convergence in Technology (I2CT), 1-5, 2021.

3. Qi, Fugui, Fulai Liang, Miao Liu, Hao Lv, Pengfei Wang, Huijun Xue, and Jianqi Wang, "Position-information-indexed classifier for improved through-wall detection and classification of human activities using UWB bio-radar," IEEE Antennas and Wireless Propagation Letters, Vol. 18, No. 3, 437-441, 2019.

4. Cicchetti, Renato, Emanuela Miozzi, and Orlandino Testa, "Wideband and UWB antennas for wireless applications: A comprehensive review," International Journal of Antennas and Propagation, Vol. 2017, Article ID 2390808, 2017.

5. Shao, Wenyi, Arezou Edalati, Todd R. McCollough, and William J. McCollough, "A time-domain measurement system for UWB microwave imaging," IEEE Transactions on Microwave Theory and Techniques, Vol. 66, No. 5, 2265-2275, 2018.

6. Sun, Jian Xu, Yu Jian Cheng, Ya Fei Wu, and Yong Fan, "Ultrawideband, low-profile, and low-RCS conformal phased array with capacitance-integrated balun and multifunctional meta-surface," IEEE Transactions on Antennas and Propagation, Vol. 70, No. 9, 7448-7457, 2022.

7. John, Matthias and Max J. Ammann, "Antenna optimization with a computationally efficient multiobjective evolutionary algorithm," IEEE Transactions on Antennas and Propagation, Vol. 57, No. 1, 260-263, 2009.

8. Recioui, Abdelmadjid, "Concentric ring arrays optimization using the spiral inspired technique," Algerian Journal of Signals and Systems, Vol. 3, No. 1, 10-21, 2018.
doi:10.51485/ajss.v3i1.55

9. Rahmat-Samii, Yahya, "Genetic algorithm (GA) and particle swarm optimization (PSO) in engineering electromagnetics," 17th International Conference on Applied Electromagnetics and Communications, 2003. ICECom 2003, 1-5, 2003.

10. Recioui, Abdelmadjid, "Application of the spiral optimization technique to antenna array design," Handbook of Research on Emergent Applications of Optimization Algorithms, 364-385, IGI Global, 2018.

11. Lin, Chen, Fu-Shun Zhang, Kui Dong, and Yong-Chang Jiao, "Design of a modified monopole antenna using PSO based on FEKO for wireless communications," 2010 International Conference on Microwave and Millimeter Wave Technology, 1070-1073, 2010.

12. Recioui, Abdelmadjid, "Application of a hybrid Taguchi-genetic algorithm to the multiobjective design optimization of Yagi-Uda antennas," Wireless Personal Communications, Vol. 71, 1403-1420, 2013.

13. Krishnan, Anoop, Ali Almadan, and Ajita Rattani, "Understanding fairness of gender classification algorithms across gender-race groups," 2020 19th IEEE International Conference on Machine Learning and Applications (ICMLA), 1028-1035, 2020.

14. Lo, Chun Yan, Chiu-Wing Sham, and Longyu Ma, "A novel iris verification framework using machine learning algorithm on embedded systems," 2020 IEEE 9th Global Conference on Consumer Electronics (GCCE), 173-175, 2020.

15. Villa, Maria, Mikhail Gofman, Sinjini Mitra, Ali Almadan, Anoop Krishnan, and Ajita Rattani, "A survey of biometric and machine learning methods for tracking students' attention and engagement," 2020 19th IEEE International Conference on Machine Learning and Applications (ICMLA), 948-955, 2020.

16. Degadwala, Sheshang, Dhairya Vyas, and Harsh Dave, "Classification of COVID-19 cases using fine-tune convolution neural network (FT-CNN)," 2021 International Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Smart Systems (ICAIS), 609-613, 2021.

17. Sengar, Prateek P., Mihir J. Gaikwad, and Ashlesha S. Nagdive, "Comparative study of machine learning algorithms for breast cancer prediction," 2020 Third International Conference on Smart Systems and Inventive Technology (ICSSIT), 796-801, 2020.

18. Günaydin, Özge, Melike Günay, and Öznur Şengel, "Comparison of lung cancer detection algorithms," 2019 Scientific Meeting on Electrical-Electronics & Biomedical Engineering and Computer Science (EBBT), 1-4, 2019.

19. Vats, Prakhar and Krishna Samdani, "Study on machine learning techniques in financial markets," 2019 IEEE International Conference on System, Computation, Automation and Networking (ICSCAN), 1-5, 2019.

20. Trivedi, Dhruvil, Ashish Bhagchandani, Rutul Ganatra, and Mokshit Mehta, "Machine learning in finance," 2018 IEEE Punecon, 1-4, 2018.

21. Indharapu, Sai S., Anthony N. Caruso, and Kalyan C. Durbhakula, "Supervised machine learning model for accurate output prediction of various antenna designs," 2022 IEEE International Symposium on Antennas and Propagation and USNC-URSI Radio Science Meeting (AP-S/URSI), 495-496, 2022.

22. Wu, Qi, Yi Cao, Haiming Wang, and Wei Hong, "Machine-learning-assisted optimization and its application to antenna designs: Opportunities and challenges," China Communications, Vol. 17, No. 4, 152-164, 2020.

23. Sharma, Yashika, Hao Helen Zhang, and Hao Xin, "Machine learning techniques for optimizing design of double T-shaped monopole antenna," IEEE Transactions on Antennas and Propagation, Vol. 68, No. 7, 5658-5663, 2020.

24. Huang, Jinhua, Wenting Li, Yejun He, Long Zhang, and Sai-Wai Wong, "Optimization of antenna design using the artificial neural network and the simulated annealing algorithm," 2021 Computing, Communications and IoT Applications (ComComAp), 119-122, 2021.

25. Gampala, Gopinath and C. J. Reddy, "Fast and intelligent antenna design optimization using machine learning," 2020 International Applied Computational Electromagnetics Society Symposium (ACES), 1-2, 2020.

26. Fallahi, Hojjatollah and Zahra Atlasbaf, "Study of a class of UWB CPW-fed monopole antenna with fractal elements," IEEE Antennas and Wireless Propagation Letters, Vol. 12, 1484-1487, 2013.

27. Aneesh, Mohammad, J. A. Ansari, Ashish Singh, S. Verma, et al., "RBF neural network modeling of rectangular microstrip patch antenna," 2012 Third International Conference on Computer and Communication Technology, 241-244, 2012.

28. Ustun, Deniz, Mustafa Tekbas, and Abdurrahim Toktas, "Determination of feed point by surrogate model based on radial basis function for rectangular microstrip antennas," 2019 International Artificial Intelligence and Data Processing Symposium (IDAP), 1-3, 2019.

29. Sharma, Yashika, Junqiang Wu, Hao Xin, and Hao Helen Zhang, "Sparse linear regression for optimizing design parameters of double T-shaped monopole antennas," 2017 IEEE International Symposium on Antennas and Propagation & USNC/URSI National Radio Science Meeting, 347-348, San Diego, CA, USA, 2017.

30. Cui, Liangze, Yao Zhang, Runren Zhang, and Qing Huo Liu, "A modified efficient KNN method for antenna optimization and design," IEEE Transactions on Antennas and Propagation, Vol. 68, No. 10, 6858-6866, 2020.