Vol. 123
Latest Volume
All Volumes
PIERC 150 [2024] PIERC 149 [2024] PIERC 148 [2024] PIERC 147 [2024] PIERC 146 [2024] PIERC 145 [2024] PIERC 144 [2024] PIERC 143 [2024] PIERC 142 [2024] PIERC 141 [2024] PIERC 140 [2024] PIERC 139 [2024] PIERC 138 [2023] PIERC 137 [2023] PIERC 136 [2023] PIERC 135 [2023] PIERC 134 [2023] PIERC 133 [2023] PIERC 132 [2023] PIERC 131 [2023] PIERC 130 [2023] PIERC 129 [2023] PIERC 128 [2023] PIERC 127 [2022] PIERC 126 [2022] PIERC 125 [2022] PIERC 124 [2022] PIERC 123 [2022] PIERC 122 [2022] PIERC 121 [2022] PIERC 120 [2022] PIERC 119 [2022] PIERC 118 [2022] PIERC 117 [2021] PIERC 116 [2021] PIERC 115 [2021] PIERC 114 [2021] PIERC 113 [2021] PIERC 112 [2021] PIERC 111 [2021] PIERC 110 [2021] PIERC 109 [2021] PIERC 108 [2021] PIERC 107 [2021] PIERC 106 [2020] PIERC 105 [2020] PIERC 104 [2020] PIERC 103 [2020] PIERC 102 [2020] PIERC 101 [2020] PIERC 100 [2020] PIERC 99 [2020] PIERC 98 [2020] PIERC 97 [2019] PIERC 96 [2019] PIERC 95 [2019] PIERC 94 [2019] PIERC 93 [2019] PIERC 92 [2019] PIERC 91 [2019] PIERC 90 [2019] PIERC 89 [2019] PIERC 88 [2018] PIERC 87 [2018] PIERC 86 [2018] PIERC 85 [2018] PIERC 84 [2018] PIERC 83 [2018] PIERC 82 [2018] PIERC 81 [2018] PIERC 80 [2018] PIERC 79 [2017] PIERC 78 [2017] PIERC 77 [2017] PIERC 76 [2017] PIERC 75 [2017] PIERC 74 [2017] PIERC 73 [2017] PIERC 72 [2017] PIERC 71 [2017] PIERC 70 [2016] PIERC 69 [2016] PIERC 68 [2016] PIERC 67 [2016] PIERC 66 [2016] PIERC 65 [2016] PIERC 64 [2016] PIERC 63 [2016] PIERC 62 [2016] PIERC 61 [2016] PIERC 60 [2015] PIERC 59 [2015] PIERC 58 [2015] PIERC 57 [2015] PIERC 56 [2015] PIERC 55 [2014] PIERC 54 [2014] PIERC 53 [2014] PIERC 52 [2014] PIERC 51 [2014] PIERC 50 [2014] PIERC 49 [2014] PIERC 48 [2014] PIERC 47 [2014] PIERC 46 [2014] PIERC 45 [2013] PIERC 44 [2013] PIERC 43 [2013] PIERC 42 [2013] PIERC 41 [2013] PIERC 40 [2013] PIERC 39 [2013] PIERC 38 [2013] PIERC 37 [2013] PIERC 36 [2013] PIERC 35 [2013] PIERC 34 [2013] PIERC 33 [2012] PIERC 32 [2012] PIERC 31 [2012] PIERC 30 [2012] PIERC 29 [2012] PIERC 28 [2012] PIERC 27 [2012] PIERC 26 [2012] PIERC 25 [2012] PIERC 24 [2011] PIERC 23 [2011] PIERC 22 [2011] PIERC 21 [2011] PIERC 20 [2011] PIERC 19 [2011] PIERC 18 [2011] PIERC 17 [2010] PIERC 16 [2010] PIERC 15 [2010] PIERC 14 [2010] PIERC 13 [2010] PIERC 12 [2010] PIERC 11 [2009] PIERC 10 [2009] PIERC 9 [2009] PIERC 8 [2009] PIERC 7 [2009] PIERC 6 [2009] PIERC 5 [2008] PIERC 4 [2008] PIERC 3 [2008] PIERC 2 [2008] PIERC 1 [2008]
2022-09-13
NavIC Multipath Signal Analysis for Soil Moisture Sensitivity in the Perspective of a Winter Wheat Crop
By
Progress In Electromagnetics Research C, Vol. 123, 281-293, 2022
Abstract
The retrieval of soil moisture in presence of vegetation has received relatively less attention than bare land when observations are made with Global Navigation Satellite System (GNSS). In plane bare land, the reflected GNSS signal is affected by the land characteristics which is dielectric constant of soil. However, in vegetated land, the reflected signal is affected by dielectric constant of soil as well as the characteristics of vegetation which makes the retrieval of soil moisture a cumbersome task in presence of vegetation. Monitoring soil moisture in vegetated land is important for soil health and its suitability for agriculture purposes. Therefore, analysis of soil moisture in presence of vegetation has been studied in this manuscript by utilising the Navigation with Indian Constellation (NavIC) which is a very new entry in GNSS domain by Indian Space Research Organization (ISRO). NavIC receiver setup was installed in a wheat agriculture land situated in Dehradun, India. The wheat crop was sown in the month of November, and it was harvested in the month of April. In situ measurement of soil moisture, crop height, humidity, soil temperature and air temperature were made. Fixed frequency method and Lomb–Scargle Periodogram (LSP) method have been analysed to determine the sensitivity of soil moisture in presence of vegetation. 15° to 30° elevation angle was utilised in the study. The sensitivity analysis was carried out by categorizing the crop based on crop height. Three crop categories have been considered which are 0 to 20 cm, 20 to 80 cm, and greater than 80 cm. The correlation coefficient in the first stage of crop growth using the fixed frequency method was 0.76, which decreased to 0.42 in second stage of crop growth and finally to 0.35 in final stage of crop growth. The correlation coefficient using LSP method was -0.68, -0.65, and -0.50 for the first, second, and third stages of crop growth, respectively. It was observed that for lower crop height (< 20 cm) fixed frequency method is more useful than LSP method. However, for higher crop height (> 20 cm) LSP method is better suited.
Citation
Vivek Chamoli, Rishi Prakash, and Anurag Vidyarthi, "NavIC Multipath Signal Analysis for Soil Moisture Sensitivity in the Perspective of a Winter Wheat Crop," Progress In Electromagnetics Research C, Vol. 123, 281-293, 2022.
doi:10.2528/PIERC22062802
References

1. Larson, K. M., E. D. Gutmann, A. L. Bilich, J. J. Braun, and V. U. Zavorotny, "Use of GPS receivers as a soil moisture network for water cycle studies," Geophysical Research Letters, Vol. 35, No. 24, 1-5, 2008.
doi:10.1029/2008GL036013

2. Larson, K. M., J. J. Braun, E. E. Small, V. U. Zavorotny, E. D. Gutmann, and A. L. Bilich, "GPS multipath and its relation to near-surface soil moisture content," IEEE J-STARS, Vol. 3, No. 1, 91-99, 2010.

3. Larson, K. M., E. D. Gutmann, V. U. Zavorotny, J. J. Braun, M. W. Williams, and F. G. Nievinski, "Can we measure snow depth with GPS receivers?," Geophysical Research Letters, Vol. 36, No. 17, 1-5, 2009.
doi:10.1029/2009GL039430

4. Chamoli, V., R. Prakash, A. Vidyarthi, and A. Ray, "Capability of NavIC, an Indian GNSS constellation, for retrieval of surface soil moisture," Progress In Electromagnetics Research C, Vol. 106, 255-270, 2020.
doi:10.2528/PIERC20090904

5. Zhang, S., N. Roussel, K. Boniface, M. C. Ha, F. Frappart, J. Darrozes, and J. C. Calvet, "Use of re ected GNSS SNR data to retrieve either soil moisture or vegetation height from a wheat crop," Hydrology and Earth System Science, Vol. 21, 4767-4784, 2017.
doi:10.5194/hess-21-4767-2017

6. Zhang, S., J. C. Calvet, J. Darrozes, N. Roussel, F. Frappart, and G. Bouhours, "Deriving surface soil moisture from reflected GNSS signal observations from a grassland site in south western France," Hydrology and Earth System Science, Vol. 22, 1931-1946, 2018.
doi:10.5194/hess-22-1931-2018

7. Larson, K. M., E. E. Small, E. Gutmann, A. Bilich, P. Axelrad, and J. Braun, "Using GPS multipath to measure soil moisture fluctuations: Initial results," GPS Solutions, Vol. 12, 173-177, 2008b.
doi:10.1007/s10291-007-0076-6

8. Rodriguez-Alvarez, N., X. Bosch-Lluis, A. Camps, M. Vall-Llossera, M. Valencia, J. F. Marchan-Hernandez, and I. Ramos-Perez, "Soil moisture retrieval using GNSS-R techniques: Experimental results over a bare soil field," IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing, Vol. 47, No. 11, 3616-3624, 2009.
doi:10.1109/TGRS.2009.2030672

9. Larson, K. M., E. E. Small, E. D. Gutmann, A. L. Bilich, J. J. Braun, and V. U. Zavorotny, "GPS multipath and its relation to near-surface soil moisture content," IEEE Journal of Selected Topics in Applied Earth Observations and Remote Sensing, Vol. 3, No. 1, 91-99, 2010.
doi:10.1109/JSTARS.2009.2033612

10. Mironov, K. and V. L. Muzalevskiy, "New algorithm for retrieval of soil moisture and surface roughness from GNSS reflectometry," 2012 IEEE International Geoscience and Remote Sensing Symposium, Vol. 1, 7530-7532, 2012.
doi:10.1109/IGARSS.2012.6351889

11. Yan, S., Z. Li, K. Yu, and K. Zhang, "GPS-R L1 interference signal processing for soil moisture estimation: An experimental study," EURASIP Journal on Advances in Signal Processing, Vol. 1, 1-13, 2012.

12. Chamoli, V., R. Prakash, A. Vidyarthi, and A. Ray, "Sensitivity of NavIC signal for soil moisture variation," International Conference on Emerging Trends in Computing and Communication Technologies, 1-4, IEEE, 2017.

13. Chamoli, V., R. Prakash, A. Vidyarthi, and A. Ray, "Capability of NavIC, an Indian GNSS constellation, for retrieval of surface soil moisture," Progress In Electromagnetics Research C, Vol. 106, 255-270, 2020.
doi:10.2528/PIERC20090904

14. Chew, C., E. E. Small, and K. M. Larson, "An algorithm for soil moisture estimation using GPS-interferometric reflectometry for bare and vegetated soil," GPS Solutions, Vol. 20, 525-537, 2015.

15. Wan, W., K. M. Larson, E. E. Small, C. C. Chew, and J. J. Braun, "Using geodetic GPS receivers to measure vegetation water content," GPS Solutions, Vol. 19, 237-248, 2015.
doi:10.1007/s10291-014-0383-7

16. Zhang, S., J.-C. Calvet, J. Darrozes, N. Roussel, F. Frédéric, and G. Bouhours, "Deriving surface soil moisture from re ected GNSS signal observations from a grassland site in southwestern France," Hydrology and Earth System Sciences, Vol. 22, 1931-1946, 2018.
doi:10.5194/hess-22-1931-2018

17. Alibakhshikenari, M., et al. "A comprehensive survey on ``Various decoupling mechanisms with focus on metamaterial and metasurface principles applicable to SAR and MIMO antenna systems"," IEEE Access, Vol. 8, 192965-193004, 2020, doi: 10.1109/ACCESS.2020.3032826.
doi:10.1109/ACCESS.2020.3032826

18. Nadeem, I., et al. "A comprehensive survey on ``circular polarized antennas" for existing and emerging wireless communication technologies," Journal of Physics D: Applied Physics, 2021.

19. Alibakhshikenari, M., "A comprehensive survey of ``Metamaterial transmission-line based antennas: Design, challenges, and applications"," IEEE Access, Vol. 8, 144778-144808, 2020, doi: 10.1109/ACCESS.2020.3013698.
doi:10.1109/ACCESS.2020.3013698

20. Bhardwaj, S. C., A. Vidyarthi, B. S. Jassal, and A. K. Shukla, "Study of temporal variation of vertical TEC using NavIC data," 2017 International Conference on Emerging Trends in Computing and Communication Technologies (ICETCCT), 1-5, Dehradun, 2017.

21. Chamoli, V., R. Prakash, A. Vidyarthi, and S. Barthwal, "Ground truth soil moisture estimation along with minimal drizzling time," International Journal of Modern Agriculture, Vol. 10, No. 2, 2692-2698, 2021.

22. Chamoli, V., R. Prakash, A. Vidyarthi, and A. Ray, "Analysis of NavIC multipath signal sensitivity for soil moisture in presence of vegetation," International Conference on Innovative Computing and Communications, Vol. 2, 353-364, Springer, Singapore, 2020.

23. Mironov, K. and V. L. Muzalevskiy, "New algorithm for retrieval of soil moisture and surface roughness from GNSS reflectometry," 2012 IEEE International Geoscience and Remote Sensing Symposium, Vol. 1, 7530-7532, 2012.
doi:10.1109/IGARSS.2012.6351889

24. Yan, S., Z. Li, K. Yu, and K. Zhang, "GPS-R L1 interference signal processing for soil moisture estimation: An experimental study," EURASIP Journal on Advances in Signal Processing, Vol. 1, 1-13, 2012.

25. Roussel, N., F. Frédéric, D. José, B. Frédéric, L. Laurent, and C. Minh, "Detection of soil moisture variations using GPS and GLONASS SNR data for elevation angles ranging from 2 to 70," IEEE Journal of Selected Topics in Applied Earth Observations and Remote Sensing, Vol. 9, 4781-4794, 2016.
doi:10.1109/JSTARS.2016.2537847

26. Lomb, N. R., "Least-squares frequency analysis of unequally spaced data," Astrophysics and Space Science, Vol. 39, 447-462, 1976.
doi:10.1007/BF00648343

27. Scargle, J. D., "Studies in astronomical time series analysis. II --- Statistical aspects of spectral analysis of unevenly spaced data," The Astrophysical Journal, Vol. 263, 835-853, 1982.
doi:10.1086/160554

28. Press, W. H. and G. B. Rybicki, "Fast algorithm for spectral analysis of unevenly sampled data," The Astrophysical Journal, Vol. 338, 277-280, 1989.
doi:10.1086/167197

29. Wu, X., S. Jin, and J. Xia, "A forward GPS multipath simulator based on the vegetation radiative transfer equation model," Sensors, Vol. 17, 1291, 2017.
doi:10.3390/s17061291