Vol. 122
Latest Volume
All Volumes
PIERC 150 [2024] PIERC 149 [2024] PIERC 148 [2024] PIERC 147 [2024] PIERC 146 [2024] PIERC 145 [2024] PIERC 144 [2024] PIERC 143 [2024] PIERC 142 [2024] PIERC 141 [2024] PIERC 140 [2024] PIERC 139 [2024] PIERC 138 [2023] PIERC 137 [2023] PIERC 136 [2023] PIERC 135 [2023] PIERC 134 [2023] PIERC 133 [2023] PIERC 132 [2023] PIERC 131 [2023] PIERC 130 [2023] PIERC 129 [2023] PIERC 128 [2023] PIERC 127 [2022] PIERC 126 [2022] PIERC 125 [2022] PIERC 124 [2022] PIERC 123 [2022] PIERC 122 [2022] PIERC 121 [2022] PIERC 120 [2022] PIERC 119 [2022] PIERC 118 [2022] PIERC 117 [2021] PIERC 116 [2021] PIERC 115 [2021] PIERC 114 [2021] PIERC 113 [2021] PIERC 112 [2021] PIERC 111 [2021] PIERC 110 [2021] PIERC 109 [2021] PIERC 108 [2021] PIERC 107 [2021] PIERC 106 [2020] PIERC 105 [2020] PIERC 104 [2020] PIERC 103 [2020] PIERC 102 [2020] PIERC 101 [2020] PIERC 100 [2020] PIERC 99 [2020] PIERC 98 [2020] PIERC 97 [2019] PIERC 96 [2019] PIERC 95 [2019] PIERC 94 [2019] PIERC 93 [2019] PIERC 92 [2019] PIERC 91 [2019] PIERC 90 [2019] PIERC 89 [2019] PIERC 88 [2018] PIERC 87 [2018] PIERC 86 [2018] PIERC 85 [2018] PIERC 84 [2018] PIERC 83 [2018] PIERC 82 [2018] PIERC 81 [2018] PIERC 80 [2018] PIERC 79 [2017] PIERC 78 [2017] PIERC 77 [2017] PIERC 76 [2017] PIERC 75 [2017] PIERC 74 [2017] PIERC 73 [2017] PIERC 72 [2017] PIERC 71 [2017] PIERC 70 [2016] PIERC 69 [2016] PIERC 68 [2016] PIERC 67 [2016] PIERC 66 [2016] PIERC 65 [2016] PIERC 64 [2016] PIERC 63 [2016] PIERC 62 [2016] PIERC 61 [2016] PIERC 60 [2015] PIERC 59 [2015] PIERC 58 [2015] PIERC 57 [2015] PIERC 56 [2015] PIERC 55 [2014] PIERC 54 [2014] PIERC 53 [2014] PIERC 52 [2014] PIERC 51 [2014] PIERC 50 [2014] PIERC 49 [2014] PIERC 48 [2014] PIERC 47 [2014] PIERC 46 [2014] PIERC 45 [2013] PIERC 44 [2013] PIERC 43 [2013] PIERC 42 [2013] PIERC 41 [2013] PIERC 40 [2013] PIERC 39 [2013] PIERC 38 [2013] PIERC 37 [2013] PIERC 36 [2013] PIERC 35 [2013] PIERC 34 [2013] PIERC 33 [2012] PIERC 32 [2012] PIERC 31 [2012] PIERC 30 [2012] PIERC 29 [2012] PIERC 28 [2012] PIERC 27 [2012] PIERC 26 [2012] PIERC 25 [2012] PIERC 24 [2011] PIERC 23 [2011] PIERC 22 [2011] PIERC 21 [2011] PIERC 20 [2011] PIERC 19 [2011] PIERC 18 [2011] PIERC 17 [2010] PIERC 16 [2010] PIERC 15 [2010] PIERC 14 [2010] PIERC 13 [2010] PIERC 12 [2010] PIERC 11 [2009] PIERC 10 [2009] PIERC 9 [2009] PIERC 8 [2009] PIERC 7 [2009] PIERC 6 [2009] PIERC 5 [2008] PIERC 4 [2008] PIERC 3 [2008] PIERC 2 [2008] PIERC 1 [2008]
2022-08-13
Fast Computing Method and Response Characteristic Analysis for Array Dielectric Logging
By
Progress In Electromagnetics Research C, Vol. 122, 243-252, 2022
Abstract
Dielectric logging is a valuable tool for locating and developing tight reservoirs, low contrast reservoirs, shale oil and gas reservoirs, and other unconventional oil and gas reservoirs. The processing of multi-frequency and multi-spacing dielectric logging measurements is based on a stable and efficient response computation algorithm. An equivalent computation model for the push-against-hole array dielectric logging tool is established in this paper, and an improved forward method based on the semi-analytical algorithm for dielectric logging response is devised. Thus the calculation speed of each measurement point's dielectric logging response is increased by more than 8 times. Dielectric logging response charts are also constructed, showing amplitude attenuation and phase shift as functions of formation resistivity and relative permittivity at various operating frequencies. The effects of mud cake, invasion, and anisotropy on the response signal are then simulated and evaluated. The findings reveal that: (1) as the high-frequency response changes significantly when the mud cake is thick, to correct the mud cake's influence, the mud cake parameters can be extracted using the high-frequency detection mode. (2) Invasion has a complicated effect on the high-frequency response, and higher resistivity or relative permittivity in the invasion zone can readily lead to an oscillatory nonlinear shift in the response as a function of invasion depth. This means that for high-resistivity and high-permittivity formations, the high-frequency response has a larger sensitivity and a deeper depth of investigation. (3) When the anisotropy coefficient is small, the high-frequency response is preferable for extracting anisotropy; however, as anisotropy increases, the low-frequency response becomes more sensitive to anisotropy than the high-frequency response.
Citation
Lianyun Cai, and Shaogui Deng, "Fast Computing Method and Response Characteristic Analysis for Array Dielectric Logging," Progress In Electromagnetics Research C, Vol. 122, 243-252, 2022.
doi:10.2528/PIERC22060605
References

1. Chew, W. C., "Modeling of the dielectric logging tool at high frequencies: Applications and results," IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing, Vol. 26, No. 4, 388-398, 1988, https://doi.org/10.1109/36.3042.
doi:10.1109/36.3042

2. Forgang, S., B. Corley, A. Garcia, A. Hanif, F. Le, J. Jones, et al. "A new multi-frequency array-dielectric logging service: Tool physics, field testing, and case studies in the permian basin wolfcamp shale," SPWLA 60th Annual Logging Symposium Transactions, 1-21, Society of Petrophysicists and Well Log Analysts, 2019, https://doi.org/10.30632/T60ALS-2019_W.

3. Herlinger, R., "Dielectric logging: Principles, applications, and examples from the Brazilian oilfields," Offshore Technology Conference Brasil 2019, OTCB 2019, 2020, https://doi.org/10.4043/29882-ms.

4. Hizem, M., H. Budan, B. Deville, O. Faivre, L. Mosse, and M. Simon, "Dielectric dispersion: A new wireline petrophysical measurement," SPE Annual Technical Conference and Exhibition, Society of Petroleum Engineers, Denver, Colorado, USA, 2008, https://doi.org/10.2118/116130-MS.

5. Hong, D., W.-F. Huang, and Q. H. Liu, "Radiation of arbitrary magnetic dipoles in a cylindrically layered anisotropic medium for well-logging applications," IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing, Vol. 54, No. 11, 6362-6370, 2016, https://doi.org/10.1109/TGRS.2016.2582535.
doi:10.1109/TGRS.2016.2582535

6. Hong, D., W.-F. Huang, H. Chen, and Q. H. Liu, "Novel and stable formulations for the response of horizontal-coil eccentric antennas in a cylindrically multilayered medium," IEEE Transactions on Antennas and Propagation, Vol. 65, No. 4, 1967-1977, 2017, https://doi.org/10.1109/TAP.2017.2670360.
doi:10.1109/TAP.2017.2670360

7. Kang, Z., S. Ke, C. Yin, W. Wang, S. Zheng, X. Sun, and J. Li, "Dielectric constant measurements of sweep frequency and its effect from 20 MHz to 1000 MHz," Journal of Petroleum Science and Engineering, Vol. 166, 602-610, March 2018, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.petrol.2018.03.093.
doi:10.1016/j.petrol.2018.03.093

8. Little, J. D., D. R. Julander, L. C. Knauer, J. T. Aultman, and J. L. Hemingway, "Dielectric dispersion measurements in California heavy oil reservoirs," SPWLA 51st Annual Logging Symposium, SPWLA-2010-14021, Society of Petrophysicists and Well-Log Analysts, Perth, Australia, 2010.

9. Liu, C. R., "Principle of dielectric logging tools," Theory of Electromagnetic Well Logging, 447-501, Elsevier, 2017, https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-804008-9.00012-1.

10. Liu, H., D. Hong, N. Li, W. Han, and Q. H. Liu, "Solving electromagnetic fields by general reflectiontransmission method for coaxial-coil antenna in cylindrically multilayered medium," IEEE Geoscience and Remote Sensing Letters, Vol. 15, No. 6, 912-916, 2018, https://doi.org/10.1109/LGRS.2018.2814614.
doi:10.1109/LGRS.2018.2814614

11. Lovell, J. and W. Chew, "Response of a point source in a multicylindrcally layered medium," IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing, Vol. 25, No. 6, 850-858, 1987, https://doi.org/10.1109/TGRS.1987.289757.
doi:10.1109/TGRS.1987.289757

12. Mosse, L., R. Carmona, E. Decoster, O. Faivre, and M. Hizem, "Dielectric dispersion logging in heavy oil: A case study from the orinoco belt," SPWLA 50th Annual Logging Symposium, 16, Society of Petrophysicists and Well-Log Analysts, The Woodlands, Texas, 2009.

13. Pirrone, M., H. Mei, N. Bona, M. Borghi, M. T. Galli, F. Pampuri, et al. "A novel approach based on dielectric dispersion measurements to evaluate the quality of complex shaly-sand reservoirs," SPE Annual Technical Conference and Exhibition, 13, Society of Petroleum Engineers, Denver, Colorado, USA, 2011, https://doi.org/10.2118/147245-MS.

14. Rabinovich, M., S. Liu, F. Le, H. M. Maurer, and J. Dahl, "Challenges of measuring dielectric anisotropy with high-frequency dielectric logging tools," SPWLA 56th Annual Logging Symposium 2015, SPWLA-2015-JJ, 2015.

15. Rodríguez-Rozas, Á. and D. Pardo, "priori fourier analysis for 2.5D finite elements simulations of logging-while-drilling (LWD) resistivity measurements," Procedia Computer Science, Vol. 80, 782-791, 2016, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procs.2016.05.368.
doi:10.1016/j.procs.2016.05.368

16. Rodríguez-Rozas, Á., D. Pardo, and C. Torres-Verdín, "Fast 2.5D finite element simulations of borehole resistivity measurements," Computational Geosciences, Vol. 22, No. 5, 1271-1281, 2018, https://doi.org/10.1007/s10596-018-9751-7.
doi:10.1007/s10596-018-9751-7

17. Rosa, G. S. and J. R. Bergmann, "Pseudo-analytical modeling for the electromagnetic propagation in stratified cylindrical structures," IEEE Antennas and Wireless Propagation Letters, Vol. 15, 344-347, 2016, https://doi.org/10.1109/LAWP.2015.2444418.
doi:10.1109/LAWP.2015.2444418

18. Seleznev, N. V., R. L. Kleinberg, M. M. Herron, M. Machlus, A. E. Pomerantz, S. L. Reeder, et al. "Applications of dielectric dispersion logging to oil shale reservoirs," SPWLA 52nd Annual Logging Symposium, SPWLA-2011-G, Society of Petrophysicists and Well-Log Analysts, Colorado Springs, Colorado, 2011.