volume | PIER Journals

Abstract

Characterization of the human body channel is a necessity to pave way for practical implementation of intrabody communication (IBC) in body area networks (BAN). In this paper, a circuit-coupled finite element method (FEM) based model is proposed to represent the galvanic coupling type IBC on human arm. In contrast with other models for IBC, both the finite element method and the parasitic capacitances between electrodes are taken into account in the modeling. To understand the characteristics of IBC, simulations with multiple frequencies, excitation voltages, channel lengths and values of parasitic capacitors are carried out using the model. The current density and electric field distribution in different human tissues reveal an insight into signal transmission path through the human body intuitively. The body channel gain presents a band-pass property after adding the parasitic capacitances into the model, while it performs an increasing characteristic with the frequency before the adding. Finally, a galvanic coupling IBC measurement setup is fulfilled, and the outcome shows a good agreement with the proposed model. It is indicated that the parasitic capacitances are the major factors to cause the band-pass and affect the bandwidth, and they should not be neglected in the real IBC applications.

1. Zimmerman, T. G., "Personal area networks: Near-field intra-body communication,", M.S. thesis, MIT Media Lab., Cambridge, MA, Sep. 1995.
doi:10.1109/EMBC.2012.6346971

2. Kobayashi, T., Y. Shimatani, and M. Kyoso, "Application of near-field intra-body communication and spread spectrum technique to vital-sign monitor," Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society (EMBC), 2012 Annual International Conference of the IEEE, 4517-4520, 2012.

3. IEEE Standard for Local and Metropolitan Area Networks — Part 15.6: Wireless Body Area Networks, IEEE Standard 02.15.6-2012, , 1-271, 2012.
doi:10.1109/TBME.2013.2254714

4. Seyedi, M., B. Kibret, D. T. H. Lai, and M. Faulkner, "A survey on intrabody communications for body area network applications," IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering, Vol. 60, No. 8, 2067-2079, 2013.
doi:10.1109/TIM.2012.2205491

5. Lucev, Z., I. Krois, and M. Cifrek, "A capacitive intrabody communication channel from 100 kHz to 100 MHz," IEEE Transactions on Instrumentation and Measurement, Vol. 61, No. 12, 3280-3289, 2012.
doi:10.1109/TBME.2010.2093933

6. Xu, R., H. Zhu, and J. Yuan, "Electric-field intrabody communication channel modeling with finite-element method," IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering, Vol. 58, No. 3, 705-712, Mar. 2011.
doi:10.1109/TBME.2013.2289946

7. Callejon, M. A., J. Reina-Tosina, D. Naranjo-Hernandez, and L. M. Roa, "Galvanic coupling transmission in intrabody communication: A finite element approach," IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering, Vol. 61, No. 3, 775-783, 2014.

8. Pun, S. H., Y. M. Gao, P. U. Mak, M. I. Vai, and M. Du, "Quasi-static modeling of human limb for intra-body communications with experiments," IEEE Trans. Inf. Technol. Biomed., Vol. 15, No. 6, 870-876, Nov. 2011.
doi:10.1016/j.sna.2006.04.044

9. Hachisuka, K., Y. Terauchi, Y. Kishi, et al. "Simplified circuit modeling and fabrication of intrabody communication devices," Sens. Actuators A, Vol. 130–131, 322-330, Jun. 2006.
doi:10.1109/TAP.2013.2246534

10. Haga, N., K. Saito, M. Takahashi, et al. "Equivalent circuit of intrabody communication channels inducing conduction currents inside the human body," IEEE Transactions on Antennas and Propagation, Vol. 61, No. 5, 2807-2816, 2013.
doi:10.1109/JBHI.2014.2301165

11. Kibret, B., M. Seyedi, D. T. Lai, et al. "Investigation of galvanic-coupled intrabody communication using the human body circuit model," IEEE J. Biomed. Health Inform., Vol. 18, No. 4, 1196-1206, Jul. 2014.
doi:10.1109/TBCAS.2015.2412548

12. Swaminathan, M., F. S. Cabrera, J. S. Pujol, U. Muncuk, G. Schirner, and K. R. Chowdhury, "Multi-path model and sensitivity analysis for galvanic coupled intra-body communication through layered tissue," IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Circuits and Systems, Vol. 10, No. 2, 339-351, Apr. 2016.
doi:10.1109/TBME.2012.2205382

13. Callejon, M. A., D. Naranjo-Hernandez, J. Reina-Tosina, and L. M. Roa, "Distributed circuit modeling of galvanic and capacitive coupling for intrabody communication," IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering, Vol. 59, No. 11, 3263-3269, Nov. 2012.

14. Xu, R., H. Zhu, and J. Yuan, "Circuit-coupled FEM analysis of the electric field type intra-body communication channel," Proc. IEEE Biomed. Circuits Syst. Conf., 221-224, Nov. 2009.

15. Gao, Y. M., Z. M. Wu, S. H. Pun, et al. "A novel field-circuit FEM modeling and channel gain estimation for galvanic coupling real IBC measurements," Sensors (Basel), Vol. 16, No. 4, Apr. 2, 2016.
doi:10.1088/0031-9155/41/11/003

16. Gabriel, S., R. W. Lau, and C. Gabriel, "The dielectric properties of biological tissues: III. Parametric models for the dielectric spectrum of tissues," Phys. Med. Biol., Vol. 41, No. 11, 2271-2293, 1996.

17. Gao, Y. M., "Investigation of electromagnetic model and empirical analysis for galvanic coupling intra-body communication,", Ph.D. Thesis of Fuzhou University, 103–105, 2010.
doi:10.1109/TMTT.2007.895640

18. Cho, N., J. Yoo, S.-J. Song, et al. "The human body characteristics as a signal transmission medium for intrabody communication," IEEE Transactions on Microwave Theory and Techniques, Vol. 55, No. 5, 1080-1086, 2007.

19. Chen, Z. Y., Y. M. Gao, and M. Du, "Multilayer distributed circuit modeling for galvanic coupling intrabody communication," Journal of Sensors, Vol. 2018, 8096064, 2018.

Professor Zhiying Chen

Dr. Yueming Gao

Dr. Min Du

Dr. Feng Lin