Vol. 101
Latest Volume
All Volumes
PIERC 150 [2024] PIERC 149 [2024] PIERC 148 [2024] PIERC 147 [2024] PIERC 146 [2024] PIERC 145 [2024] PIERC 144 [2024] PIERC 143 [2024] PIERC 142 [2024] PIERC 141 [2024] PIERC 140 [2024] PIERC 139 [2024] PIERC 138 [2023] PIERC 137 [2023] PIERC 136 [2023] PIERC 135 [2023] PIERC 134 [2023] PIERC 133 [2023] PIERC 132 [2023] PIERC 131 [2023] PIERC 130 [2023] PIERC 129 [2023] PIERC 128 [2023] PIERC 127 [2022] PIERC 126 [2022] PIERC 125 [2022] PIERC 124 [2022] PIERC 123 [2022] PIERC 122 [2022] PIERC 121 [2022] PIERC 120 [2022] PIERC 119 [2022] PIERC 118 [2022] PIERC 117 [2021] PIERC 116 [2021] PIERC 115 [2021] PIERC 114 [2021] PIERC 113 [2021] PIERC 112 [2021] PIERC 111 [2021] PIERC 110 [2021] PIERC 109 [2021] PIERC 108 [2021] PIERC 107 [2021] PIERC 106 [2020] PIERC 105 [2020] PIERC 104 [2020] PIERC 103 [2020] PIERC 102 [2020] PIERC 101 [2020] PIERC 100 [2020] PIERC 99 [2020] PIERC 98 [2020] PIERC 97 [2019] PIERC 96 [2019] PIERC 95 [2019] PIERC 94 [2019] PIERC 93 [2019] PIERC 92 [2019] PIERC 91 [2019] PIERC 90 [2019] PIERC 89 [2019] PIERC 88 [2018] PIERC 87 [2018] PIERC 86 [2018] PIERC 85 [2018] PIERC 84 [2018] PIERC 83 [2018] PIERC 82 [2018] PIERC 81 [2018] PIERC 80 [2018] PIERC 79 [2017] PIERC 78 [2017] PIERC 77 [2017] PIERC 76 [2017] PIERC 75 [2017] PIERC 74 [2017] PIERC 73 [2017] PIERC 72 [2017] PIERC 71 [2017] PIERC 70 [2016] PIERC 69 [2016] PIERC 68 [2016] PIERC 67 [2016] PIERC 66 [2016] PIERC 65 [2016] PIERC 64 [2016] PIERC 63 [2016] PIERC 62 [2016] PIERC 61 [2016] PIERC 60 [2015] PIERC 59 [2015] PIERC 58 [2015] PIERC 57 [2015] PIERC 56 [2015] PIERC 55 [2014] PIERC 54 [2014] PIERC 53 [2014] PIERC 52 [2014] PIERC 51 [2014] PIERC 50 [2014] PIERC 49 [2014] PIERC 48 [2014] PIERC 47 [2014] PIERC 46 [2014] PIERC 45 [2013] PIERC 44 [2013] PIERC 43 [2013] PIERC 42 [2013] PIERC 41 [2013] PIERC 40 [2013] PIERC 39 [2013] PIERC 38 [2013] PIERC 37 [2013] PIERC 36 [2013] PIERC 35 [2013] PIERC 34 [2013] PIERC 33 [2012] PIERC 32 [2012] PIERC 31 [2012] PIERC 30 [2012] PIERC 29 [2012] PIERC 28 [2012] PIERC 27 [2012] PIERC 26 [2012] PIERC 25 [2012] PIERC 24 [2011] PIERC 23 [2011] PIERC 22 [2011] PIERC 21 [2011] PIERC 20 [2011] PIERC 19 [2011] PIERC 18 [2011] PIERC 17 [2010] PIERC 16 [2010] PIERC 15 [2010] PIERC 14 [2010] PIERC 13 [2010] PIERC 12 [2010] PIERC 11 [2009] PIERC 10 [2009] PIERC 9 [2009] PIERC 8 [2009] PIERC 7 [2009] PIERC 6 [2009] PIERC 5 [2008] PIERC 4 [2008] PIERC 3 [2008] PIERC 2 [2008] PIERC 1 [2008]
2020-05-12
Characterization Study of Mutual Coupling Between Monopole Antennas on Finite Ground Plane at Out of Band Resonant Frequencies
By
Progress In Electromagnetics Research C, Vol. 101, 247-259, 2020
Abstract
When multiple antennas, operating at different frequencies, are installed on a single platform where the typical inter antenna spacing is a few wavelengths at the lowest frequency, the mutual coupling between the antennas can be optimized by the suitable selection of frequencies and the separation of adjacent antennas. This paper characterizes the dependency of mutual coupling between monopoles on the frequency and separation of the radiating/interfering monopole as well as on the size and shape of the ground plane. The out of band (off-band) characteristics of the monopoles are studied, and the effect of frequency offset between the adjacent monopoles on off-band mutual coupling is summarized. The off-band mutual coupling is reduced by more than 15 dB when the adjacent antenna frequency is selected to be near the fourth harmonic. In the case of smaller ground planes, better isolation of more than 20 dB is possible at intermediate antenna spacing than at the edges. The effect on radiation pattern of an antenna by the proximity of nearby antennas is also studied. The operating frequency/resonant length of the nearby antenna and the inter antenna spacing are found to be the key factors causing variation in radiation pattern. Lower off-band interfering antenna of bigger size is found to have significant effect on radiation pattern at spacing less than 2λ. Analysis has been carried out using FEKO, whose findings are validated using another software HFSS and measurements.
Citation
Prasobh Martin, Kamla Prasan Ray, and Nalli Naga Satya Sai Rama Krishna Prasad, "Characterization Study of Mutual Coupling Between Monopole Antennas on Finite Ground Plane at Out of Band Resonant Frequencies," Progress In Electromagnetics Research C, Vol. 101, 247-259, 2020.
doi:10.2528/PIERC20031604
References

1. Adams, A. T. and D. Warren, "Dipole plus parasitic element," IEEE Transactions on Antennas and Propagation, Vol. 19, No. 4, 536-537, Jul. 1971.
doi:10.1109/TAP.1971.1139962

2. Zhang, Y., K. Hirasawa, and K. Fujimoto, "Opened parasitic elements nearby a driven dipole," IEEE Transactions on Antennas and Propagation, Vol. 34, No. 5, 711-713, May 1986.
doi:10.1109/TAP.1986.1143888

3. King, R., "Reduction of reradiated field in equatorial plane of parasitic antenna," IEEE Transactions on Antennas and Propagation, Vol. 20, No. 3, 376-379, May 1972.
doi:10.1109/TAP.1972.1140205

4. Hanington, R. F., "Electromagnetic scattering by antennas," IEEE Transactions on Antennas and Propagation, Vol. 11, 595-596, Sep. 1963.
doi:10.1109/TAP.1963.1138078

5. Daniel, J. P., "Mutual coupling between antennas for emission or reception—Application to passive and active dipoles," IEEE Transactions on Antennas and Propagation, Vol. 22, No. 2, 347-349, Mar. 1974.
doi:10.1109/TAP.1974.1140774

6. Lui, H., H. T. Hui, and M. S. Leong, "A note on the mutual-coupling problems in transmitting and receiving antenna arrays," IEEE Antennas and Propagation MagazinE, Vol. 51, No. 5, 171-176, Oct. 2009.

7. Henault, S., S. K. Podilchak, S. M. Mikki, and Y. M. M. Antar, "A methodology for mutual coupling estimation and compensation in antennas," IEEE Transactions on Antennas and Propagation, Vol. 61, No. 3, 1119-1131, Mar. 2013.
doi:10.1109/TAP.2012.2229955

8. Zulkifli, F. Y., E. T. Rahardjo, and D. Hartanto, "Mutual coupling reduction using dumbbell defected ground structure for multiband microstrip antenna array," Progress In Electromagnetics Research Letters, Vol. 13, 29-40, 2010.
doi:10.2528/PIERL09102902

9. Zuo, S., Y.-Z. Yin, W.-J. Wu, Z.-Y. Zhang, and J. Ma, "Investigations of reduction of mutual coupling between two planar monopoles using two λ/4 slots," Progress In Electromagnetics Research Letters, Vol. 19, 9-18, 2010.
doi:10.2528/PIERL10100609

10. Qiu, Y., L. Peng, X. Jiang, Z. Sun, and S. Tang, "Ultra-small single-negative metamaterial insulator for mutual coupling reduction of high-profile monopole antenna array," Progress In Electromagnetics Research C, Vol. 72, 197-205, 2017.
doi:10.2528/PIERC16100803

11. Macnamara, T., Introduction to Antenna Placement and Installation, Wiley, 2010.
doi:10.1002/9780470686874

12. Chen, Z. N., F. Yang, and T. S. P. See, "Mutual coupling between multi-band antennas on small ground plane," Proceedings of the Fourth European Conference on Antennas and Propagation, 1-4, Barcelona, 2010.

13. Wang, L., W. J. Koh, and Y. H. Lee, "Out-of-band gain prediction of blade antennas for EMC purpose," 2012 Asia-Pacific Symposium on Electromagnetic Compatibility (APEMC), 589-592, Singapore, 2012.

14. Lim, V. J. X., W. L. Ke, E. L. Tan, and E. Lee, "A study of main contributors to the out-of-band performance of a generic wire antenna," 2013 Asia-Pacific Symposium on Electromagnetic Compatibility (APEMC), 1-4, Melbourne, VIC, 2013.

15. Wang, L., Y. H. Lee, and W. J. Koh, "Generic prediction equation of both the in-band and out-of-band resonant frequencies of L-band and S band blade antennae," 10th International Symposium on Electromagnetic Compatibility, 824-828, York, 2011.

16. King, H., "Mutual impedance of unequal length antennas in echelon," IRE Transactions on Antennas and Propagation, Vol. 5, No. 3, 306-313, Jul. 1957.
doi:10.1109/TAP.1957.1144509

17. Chen, Z. N., T. S. P. See, and X. Qing, "Cross-band mutual coupling of monopole antennas on a finite-sized ground plane," IEEE Transactions on Antennas and Propagation, Vol. 61, No. 8, 4372-4375, Aug. 2013.
doi:10.1109/TAP.2013.2259572

18. Diallo, A., C. Luxey, P. L. Thuc, R. Staraj, and G. Kossiavas, "Study and reduction of the mutual coupling between two mobile phone PIFAs operating in the DCS1800 and UMTS bands," IEEE Transactions on Antennas and Propagation, Vol. 54, No. 11, 3063-3074, Nov. 2006.
doi:10.1109/TAP.2006.883981

19. Singh, H. S., B. R. Meruva, G. K. Pandey, P. K. Bharti, and M. K. Meshram, "Low mutual coupling between MIMO antennas by using two folded shorting strips," Progress In Electromagnetics Research B, Vol. 53, 205-221, 2013.
doi:10.2528/PIERB13052305

20. El Ouahabi, M., A. Zakriti, M. Essaaidi, A. Dkiouak, and E. Hanae, "A miniaturized dual-band MIMO antenna with low mutual coupling for wireless applications," Progress In Electromagnetics Research C, Vol. 93, 93-101, 2019.
doi:10.2528/PIERC19032601

21. Frid, H., H. Holter, and B. L. G. Jonsson, "An approximate method for calculating the near-field mutual coupling between line-of-sight antennas on vehicles," IEEE Transactions on Antennas and Propagation, Vol. 63, No. 9, 4132-4138, Sep. 2015.
doi:10.1109/TAP.2015.2447003

22. Balanis, C. A., Antenna Theory Analysis and Design, 65-67, 173–180, 215–217, Wiley, 2005.

23. Weiner, M. M., "Monopole element at the center of a circular ground plane whose radius is small or comparable to a wavelength," IEEE Transactions on Antennas and Propagation, Vol. 35, No. 5, 488-495, 1987.
doi:10.1109/TAP.1987.1144136

24. Thiele, G. A., "Friis transmission over a ground plane: Understanding the effects of nonfree-space conditions," IEEE Antennas and Propagation Magazine, Vol. 61, No. 1, 72-76, Feb. 2019.
doi:10.1109/MAP.2018.2883020