Vol. 100
Latest Volume
All Volumes
PIERB 107 [2024] PIERB 106 [2024] PIERB 105 [2024] PIERB 104 [2024] PIERB 103 [2023] PIERB 102 [2023] PIERB 101 [2023] PIERB 100 [2023] PIERB 99 [2023] PIERB 98 [2023] PIERB 97 [2022] PIERB 96 [2022] PIERB 95 [2022] PIERB 94 [2021] PIERB 93 [2021] PIERB 92 [2021] PIERB 91 [2021] PIERB 90 [2021] PIERB 89 [2020] PIERB 88 [2020] PIERB 87 [2020] PIERB 86 [2020] PIERB 85 [2019] PIERB 84 [2019] PIERB 83 [2019] PIERB 82 [2018] PIERB 81 [2018] PIERB 80 [2018] PIERB 79 [2017] PIERB 78 [2017] PIERB 77 [2017] PIERB 76 [2017] PIERB 75 [2017] PIERB 74 [2017] PIERB 73 [2017] PIERB 72 [2017] PIERB 71 [2016] PIERB 70 [2016] PIERB 69 [2016] PIERB 68 [2016] PIERB 67 [2016] PIERB 66 [2016] PIERB 65 [2016] PIERB 64 [2015] PIERB 63 [2015] PIERB 62 [2015] PIERB 61 [2014] PIERB 60 [2014] PIERB 59 [2014] PIERB 58 [2014] PIERB 57 [2014] PIERB 56 [2013] PIERB 55 [2013] PIERB 54 [2013] PIERB 53 [2013] PIERB 52 [2013] PIERB 51 [2013] PIERB 50 [2013] PIERB 49 [2013] PIERB 48 [2013] PIERB 47 [2013] PIERB 46 [2013] PIERB 45 [2012] PIERB 44 [2012] PIERB 43 [2012] PIERB 42 [2012] PIERB 41 [2012] PIERB 40 [2012] PIERB 39 [2012] PIERB 38 [2012] PIERB 37 [2012] PIERB 36 [2012] PIERB 35 [2011] PIERB 34 [2011] PIERB 33 [2011] PIERB 32 [2011] PIERB 31 [2011] PIERB 30 [2011] PIERB 29 [2011] PIERB 28 [2011] PIERB 27 [2011] PIERB 26 [2010] PIERB 25 [2010] PIERB 24 [2010] PIERB 23 [2010] PIERB 22 [2010] PIERB 21 [2010] PIERB 20 [2010] PIERB 19 [2010] PIERB 18 [2009] PIERB 17 [2009] PIERB 16 [2009] PIERB 15 [2009] PIERB 14 [2009] PIERB 13 [2009] PIERB 12 [2009] PIERB 11 [2009] PIERB 10 [2008] PIERB 9 [2008] PIERB 8 [2008] PIERB 7 [2008] PIERB 6 [2008] PIERB 5 [2008] PIERB 4 [2008] PIERB 3 [2008] PIERB 2 [2008] PIERB 1 [2008]
2023-07-01
Deep Learning Based Modelling of Three-Dimensional Magnetic Field
By
Progress In Electromagnetics Research B, Vol. 100, 173-189, 2023
Abstract
Computation of the magnetic field generated by permanent magnets is essential in the design and optimization of a wide range of applications. However, the existing methods to calculate the magnetic field can be time-consuming or ungeneralised. In this research, a deep learning-based fast-computed and generalised model of three-dimensional (3D) magnetic field is studied. The volumetric deep neural network model (V-Net) which consists of a contracting part to learn the geometrical context and an expanding part to enable the concise localization was applied. We synthetically generated the ground truth datasets from permanent magnets of different 3D shapes to train the V-Net. The accuracy and efficiency of this deep learning model are validated. Predicting on 50 random samples, the V-Net took 4.6 s with a GPU T4 and 23.2 s with the CPU whereas the others took a few hundreds to thousands of seconds. Therefore, the deep learning model can be potentially utilised to replace the other methods in the computation and study of the magnetic field for the design and optimization of magnetic devices (the codes used in this research are published openly in https://github.com/vantainguyen/3D_V-Net_MagneticField).
Citation
Van Tai Nguyen, Steffen Bollmann, Michael Bermingham, Ha Xuan Nguyen, and Matthew S. Dargusch, "Deep Learning Based Modelling of Three-Dimensional Magnetic Field," Progress In Electromagnetics Research B, Vol. 100, 173-189, 2023.
doi:10.2528/PIERB23051402
References

1. Arias, P., L. Adn-Arcay, B. Puerta-Catoira, A. Madrid, and J. Cudeiro, "Transcranial static magnetic field stimulation of M1 reduces corticospinal excitability without distorting sensorimotor integration in humans," Brain Stimulation: Basic, Translational, and Clinical Research in Neuromodulation, Vol. 10, No. 2, 340-342, 2017.

2. Huettel, S. A., A. W. Song, and G. McCarthy, Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Vol. 1, Sinauer Associates Sunderland, 2004.

3. Atallah, K., S. Calverley, and D. Howe, "Design, analysis and realisation of a high-performance magnetic gear," IEE Proceedings-Electric Power Applications, Vol. 151, No. 2, 135-143, 2004.
doi:10.1049/ip-epa:20040224

4. Molokanov, O., P. Dergachev, S. Osipkin, E. Kuznetsova, and P. Kurbatov, "A novel double-rotor planetary magnetic gear," IEEE Transactions on Magnetics, Vol. 54, No. 11, 1-5, 2018.
doi:10.1109/TMAG.2018.2837679

5. Wu, W., H. Lovatt, and J. Dunlop, "Analysis and design optimisation of magnetic couplings using 3D nite element modelling," IEEE Transactions on Magnetics, Vol. 33, No. 5, 4083-4094, 1997.
doi:10.1109/20.619670

6. Hu, J., J. Zou, F. Xu, Y. Li, and Yanchao Fu, "An improved PMSM rotor position sensor based on linear Hall sensors," IEEE Transactions on Magnetics, Vol. 48, No. 11, 3591-3594, 2012.
doi:10.1109/TMAG.2012.2202279

7. Li, K., Y. Xu, Z, Zhao, and M. Q.-H. Meng, "External and internal sensor fusion based localization strategy for 6-dof pose estimation of a magnetic capsule robot," IEEE Robotics and Automation Letters, Vol. 7, No. 3, 6878-6885, 2022.
doi:10.1109/LRA.2022.3178473

8. O'Connell, J. L., W. S. Robertson, and B. S. Cazzolato, "Optimization of the magnetic field produced by frustum permanent magnets for single magnet and planar halbach array con gurations," IEEE Transactions on Magnetics, Vol. 57, No. 8, 1-9, 2021.
doi:10.1109/TMAG.2021.3085108

9. Furlani, E. P., Permanent Magnet and Electromechanical Devices: Materials, Analysis, and Applications, Academic Press, 2001.

10. Caciagli, A., R. J. Baars, A. P. Philipse, and B. W. M. Kuipers, "Exact expression for the magnetic field of a finite cylinder with arbitrary uniform magnetization," Journal of Magnetism and Magnetic Materials, Vol. 456, 423-432, 2018.
doi:10.1016/j.jmmm.2018.02.003

11. O'Connell, J. L., W. S. Robertson, and B. S. Cazzolato, "Simpli ed equations for the magnetic field due to an arbitrarily-shaped polyhedral permanent magnet," Journal of Magnetism and Magnetic Materials, Vol. 510, 166894, 2020.
doi:10.1016/j.jmmm.2020.166894

12. Nguyen, V. T. and T.-F. Lu, "Modelling of magnetic field distributions of elliptical cylinder permanent magnets with diametrical magnetization," Journal of Magnetism and Magnetic Materials, Vol. 491, 165569, 2019.
doi:10.1016/j.jmmm.2019.165569

13. Hart, S., K. Hart, and J. P. Selvaggi, "Analytical expressions for the magnetic field from axially magnetized and conically shaped permanent magnets," IEEE Transactions on Magnetics, Vol. 56, No. 7, 1-9, 2020.
doi:10.1109/TMAG.2020.2992191

14. Nguyen, V. T., "Magnetic field distribution of a conical permanent magnet with an application in magnetic resonance imaging," Journal of Magnetism and Magnetic Materials, Vol. 498, No. 5, 166136, 2020.
doi:10.1016/j.jmmm.2019.166136

15. Nguyen, V., S. Bollmann, M. Bermingham, and M. S. Dargusch, "Efficient modelling of permanent magnet field distribution for deep learning applications," Journal of Magnetism and Magnetic Materials, Vol. 559, 169521, 2022.
doi:10.1016/j.jmmm.2022.169521

16. Mateev, V. and I. Marinova, "Machine learning in magnetic field calculations," 2019 19th International Symposium on Electromagnetic Fields in Mechatronics, Electrical and Electronic Engineering (ISEF), 1-2, IEEE, 2019.

17. Milletari, F., N. Navab, and S.-A. Ahmadi, "V-net: Fully convolutional neural networks for volumetric medical image segmentation," 2016 Fourth International Conference on 3D Vision (3DV), 565-571, IEEE, 2016.
doi:10.1109/3DV.2016.79

18. Kelleher, J. D., Deep Learning, MIT Press, 2019.
doi:10.7551/mitpress/11171.001.0001

19. Pan, R., T. Yang, J. Cao, K. Lu, and Z. Zhang, "Missing data imputation by K nearest neighbours based on grey relational structure and mutual information," Applied Intelligence, Vol. 43, No. 3, 614-632, 2015.
doi:10.1007/s10489-015-0666-x

20. Shanker, M., M. Y. Hu, and M. S. Hung, "Effect of data standardization on neural network training," Omega, Vol. 24, No. 4, 385-397, 1996.
doi:10.1016/0305-0483(96)00010-2

21., https://www.tensor ow.org/tutorials/load data/tfrecord, (latest access on Sep. 23, 2022).

22., https://www.tensor ow.org/api docs/python/tf/keras/optimizers/Adam, (latest access Apr. 23, 2023).

23. Ronneberger, O., P. Fischer, and T. Brox, "U-net: Convolutional networks for biomedical image segmentation," International Conference on Medical Image Computing and Computer-Assisted Intervention, Springer, 2015.

24. Weiss, K., T. M. Khoshgoftaar, and D. Wang, "A survey of transfer learning," Journal of Big Data, Vol. 3, No. 1, 1-40, 2016.
doi:10.1186/s40537-016-0043-6

25., EMS 2020 User Guide, https://www.emworks.com/portal/download, (latest access on Sep. 30, 2022).

26. Chandra, S. S., M. B. Lorenzana, X. Liu, S. Liu, S. Bollmann, and S. Crozier, "Deep learning in magnetic resonance image reconstruction," Journal of Medical Imaging and Radiation Oncology, Vol. 65, No. 5, 564-577, 2021.
doi:10.1111/1754-9485.13276

27. Karniadakis, G. E., I. G. Kevrekidis, L. Lu, P. Perdikaris, S.Wang, and L. Yang, "Physics-informed machine learning," Nature Reviews Physics, Vol. 3, No. 6, 422-440, 2021.
doi:10.1038/s42254-021-00314-5