volume | PIER Journals

2021-07-09

Robust CFAR Detection of Noise Jamming in Coherent Radars

Anatolii A. Kononov,

Dr. Anatolii A. Kononov

Research Center

STX Engine

Korea

Homepage

Dohyung Kim,

Dr. Dohyung Kim

Research Center

Korea

Homepage

Sung-Hyun Choi,

Dr. Sung-Hyun Choi

Research Center, STX Engine

Korea

Homepage

Haksoo Kim

Dr. Haksoo Kim

Research Center, STX Engine

Korea

Homepage

Progress In Electromagnetics Research B, Vol. 92, 163-192, 2021

doi:10.2528/PIERB21053002

Abstract

This paper introduces a robust constant false alarm rate (CFAR) method to detect continuous noise jamming in coherent radar systems with a single antenna having no pattern control. The proposed detector is robust to interfering signals such as strong spikes from neighboring radars and returns from targets of interest and is resistant to land, sea, and weather clutter. The detector operates on data vectors extracted from a real-valued Range-Doppler data matrix generated at the output of Doppler processing for each azimuth cell within the entire scanning sector. Each data vector consists of statistically independent range samples associated with one of the specified Doppler bins. These samples are selected from non-overlapping range intervals allocated within the noise-dominant region in the full range coverage to mitigate the effect of clutter on the detector's performance. To perform jamming detection for each cell under test (CUT) in the current antenna scan, the proposed detector uses the CUT-associated data vectors generated in the current antenna scan and CFAR reference data vectors generated in the previous antenna scan. These reference data vectors are extracted from Range-Doppler data matrices associated with reference azimuth cells uniformly distributed within the entire scanning sector. The proposed detector achieves robustness to interfering signals by using a two-step detection algorithm. The first step performs censored video integration (CVI) for the CUT and reference data vectors and individual adaptive CFAR detection in each specified Doppler bin. The detector applies the "m-of-m" detection strategy to a complete set of decisions declared by the individual CFAR detectors in the second step. This strategy provides immunity to the simultaneous presence of interfering signals in the specified Doppler bins. The robustness of the proposed noise jamming detector is verified using Monte-Carlo simulations.

Citation

Copy Export

Anatolii A. Kononov, Dohyung Kim, Sung-Hyun Choi, and Haksoo Kim, "Robust CFAR Detection of Noise Jamming in Coherent Radars," Progress In Electromagnetics Research B, Vol. 92, 163-192, 2021.
doi:10.2528/PIERB21053002

References

1. Melvin, W. L. and J. A. Scheer, Principles of Modern Radars — Vol. II, Advanced Techniques, Chapters 9 and 12, SciTech, Edison, NJ, USA, 2013.

2. Orlando, D., "A novel noise jamming detection algorithm for radar applications," IEEE Signal Processing Letters, Vol. 24, No. 2, 206-210, February 2017.
doi:10.1109/LSP.2016.2645793

3. Cui, G., A. DeMaio, A. Aubry, A. Farina, and L. Kong, "Advanced SLB architectures with invariant receivers," IEEE Transactions on Aerospace and Electronic Systems, Vol. 49, No. 2, 798-818, April 2013.
doi:10.1109/TAES.2013.6494382

4. Bandiera, F., A. Farina, D. Orlando, and G. Ricci, "Detection algorithms to discriminate between radar targets and ECM signals," IEEE Transactions on Signal Processing, Vol. 58, No. 12, 5984-5993, December 2010.
doi:10.1109/TSP.2010.2077283

5. Li, K.-I., Jamming detector and jamming detecting method, US Patent 7,835,687, 2010.

6. Kononov, A., J. H. Kim, and Y. C. Shin, "Noise jamming detection algorithm," Proc. IEEE Radar Conf. RadarCon 2013, Ottawa, ON, Canada, April 29–May 3, 2013.

7. Richards, M. A., Fundamentals of Radar Signal Processing, McGraw-Hill, New York, 2005.

8. Levanon, N., "Censored video integration in radar detection," Proc. IEEE International Radar Conference, Arlington, Virginia, May 7–10, 511–513, 1990.

9. Levanon, N., "Analytic comparison of four robust algorithms for post-detection integration," IEE Proceedings — F, Vol. 139, No. 1, 67-72, 1992.
doi:10.1049/ip-d.1992.0010

10. Epstein, B. and M. Sobel, "Life testing," Journal of the American Statistical Association, Vol. 48, No. 263, 486-502, 1953.
doi:10.1080/01621459.1953.10483488

11. Ritcey, J. A., "Performance analysis of the censored mean-level detectors," IEEE Transactions on Aerospace and Electronic Systems, Vol. 22, No. 4, 443-454, July 1986.
doi:10.1109/TAES.1986.310780

12. Kononov, A. A., J.-H. Kim, J.-K. Kim, and G. Kim, "A new class of adaptive CFAR methods for nonhomogeneous environments," Progress In Electromagnetics Research B, Vol. 64, 145-170, 2015.
doi:10.2528/PIERB15091603

13. Kononov, A. A., D. Kim, and H. S. Kim, Adaptive CFAR method for nonhomogeneous environments and system thereof, Korean Patent 10-1871874, June 21, 2018.

14. Himonas, S. D. and M. Barkat, "Automatic censored CFAR detection for nonhomogeneous environments," IEEE Transactions on Aerospace and Electronic Systems, Vol. 28, No. 1, 286-304, January 1992.
doi:10.1109/7.135454

15. Rohling, H., "Radar CFAR thresholding in clutter and multiple target situations," IEEE Transactions on Aerospace and Electronic Systems, Vol. 19, No. 4, 608-621, July 1983.
doi:10.1109/TAES.1983.309350

16. Shor, M. and N. Levanon, "Performance of order statistics CFAR," IEEE Transactions on Aerospace and Electronic Systems, Vol. 27, No. 2, 214-224, March 1991.
doi:10.1109/7.78295