Vol. 121
Latest Volume
All Volumes
PIERL 123 [2025] PIERL 122 [2024] PIERL 121 [2024] PIERL 120 [2024] PIERL 119 [2024] PIERL 118 [2024] PIERL 117 [2024] PIERL 116 [2024] PIERL 115 [2024] PIERL 114 [2023] PIERL 113 [2023] PIERL 112 [2023] PIERL 111 [2023] PIERL 110 [2023] PIERL 109 [2023] PIERL 108 [2023] PIERL 107 [2022] PIERL 106 [2022] PIERL 105 [2022] PIERL 104 [2022] PIERL 103 [2022] PIERL 102 [2022] PIERL 101 [2021] PIERL 100 [2021] PIERL 99 [2021] PIERL 98 [2021] PIERL 97 [2021] PIERL 96 [2021] PIERL 95 [2021] PIERL 94 [2020] PIERL 93 [2020] PIERL 92 [2020] PIERL 91 [2020] PIERL 90 [2020] PIERL 89 [2020] PIERL 88 [2020] PIERL 87 [2019] PIERL 86 [2019] PIERL 85 [2019] PIERL 84 [2019] PIERL 83 [2019] PIERL 82 [2019] PIERL 81 [2019] PIERL 80 [2018] PIERL 79 [2018] PIERL 78 [2018] PIERL 77 [2018] PIERL 76 [2018] PIERL 75 [2018] PIERL 74 [2018] PIERL 73 [2018] PIERL 72 [2018] PIERL 71 [2017] PIERL 70 [2017] PIERL 69 [2017] PIERL 68 [2017] PIERL 67 [2017] PIERL 66 [2017] PIERL 65 [2017] PIERL 64 [2016] PIERL 63 [2016] PIERL 62 [2016] PIERL 61 [2016] PIERL 60 [2016] PIERL 59 [2016] PIERL 58 [2016] PIERL 57 [2015] PIERL 56 [2015] PIERL 55 [2015] PIERL 54 [2015] PIERL 53 [2015] PIERL 52 [2015] PIERL 51 [2015] PIERL 50 [2014] PIERL 49 [2014] PIERL 48 [2014] PIERL 47 [2014] PIERL 46 [2014] PIERL 45 [2014] PIERL 44 [2014] PIERL 43 [2013] PIERL 42 [2013] PIERL 41 [2013] PIERL 40 [2013] PIERL 39 [2013] PIERL 38 [2013] PIERL 37 [2013] PIERL 36 [2013] PIERL 35 [2012] PIERL 34 [2012] PIERL 33 [2012] PIERL 32 [2012] PIERL 31 [2012] PIERL 30 [2012] PIERL 29 [2012] PIERL 28 [2012] PIERL 27 [2011] PIERL 26 [2011] PIERL 25 [2011] PIERL 24 [2011] PIERL 23 [2011] PIERL 22 [2011] PIERL 21 [2011] PIERL 20 [2011] PIERL 19 [2010] PIERL 18 [2010] PIERL 17 [2010] PIERL 16 [2010] PIERL 15 [2010] PIERL 14 [2010] PIERL 13 [2010] PIERL 12 [2009] PIERL 11 [2009] PIERL 10 [2009] PIERL 9 [2009] PIERL 8 [2009] PIERL 7 [2009] PIERL 6 [2009] PIERL 5 [2008] PIERL 4 [2008] PIERL 3 [2008] PIERL 2 [2008] PIERL 1 [2008]
2024-06-15
Uncertainty Analysis Method for EMC Simulation Based on the Complex Number Method of Moments
By
Progress In Electromagnetics Research Letters, Vol. 121, 7-12, 2024
Abstract
The Method of Moments (MoM) is a non-embedded uncertainty analysis method that has been widely used in Electromagnetic Compatibility (EMC) simulations in recent years due to its two major advantages of high computational efficiency and immunity from dimensional disaster. A random variable sensitivity calculation method based on the Complex Number Method of Moments (CN-MoM) is proposed in this paper to improve the accuracy of the MoM in standard deviation prediction and thereby enhance the credibility of EMC simulation uncertainty analysis results. In the parallel cable crosstalk prediction example in the literature, the result of the Monte Carlo Method (MCM) is used as the standard, and the accuracy of the new method proposed in this paper is quantitatively verified using the Feature Selective Validation (FSV) method. Compared with the MoM, the proposed method can significantly improve the calculation accuracy of the standard deviation results without sacrificing simulation efficiency.
Citation
Jinjun Bai, Bing Hu, Haichuan Cao, and Jianshu Zhou, "Uncertainty Analysis Method for EMC Simulation Based on the Complex Number Method of Moments," Progress In Electromagnetics Research Letters, Vol. 121, 7-12, 2024.
doi:10.2528/PIERL24041803
References

1. Xie, Haiyan, John F. Dawson, Jiexiong Yan, Andy C. Marvin, and Martin P. Robinson, "Numerical and analytical analysis of stochastic electromagnetic fields coupling to a printed circuit board trace," IEEE Transactions on Electromagnetic Compatibility, Vol. 62, No. 4, 1128-1135, 2020.

2. Wu, Tzong-Lin, Frits Buesink, and Flavio Canavero, "Overview of signal integrity and EMC design technologies on PCB: Fundamentals and latest progress," IEEE Transactions on Electromagnetic Compatibility, Vol. 55, No. 4, 624-638, 2013.

3. Manfredi, Paolo, Dries Vande Ginste, Daniël De Zutter, and Flavio G. Canavero, "Generalized decoupled polynomial chaos for nonlinear circuits with many random parameters," IEEE Microwave and Wireless Components Letters, Vol. 25, No. 8, 505-507, 2015.

4. Zhang, Yin, Cheng Liao, Rui Huan, Yuping Shang, and Haijing Zhou, "Analysis of nonuniform transmission lines with a perturbation technique in time domain," IEEE Transactions on Electromagnetic Compatibility, Vol. 62, No. 2, 542-548, 2020.

5. Manfredi, Paolo, Dries Vande Ginste, Daniël De Zutter, and Flavio G. Canavero, "On the passivity of polynomial chaos-based augmented models for stochastic circuits," IEEE Transactions on Circuits and Systems I: Regular Papers, Vol. 60, No. 11, 2998-3007, 2013.

6. Manfredi, Paolo and Flavio G. Canavero, "General decoupled method for statistical interconnect simulation via polynomial chaos," 2014 IEEE 23rd Conference on Electrical Performance of Electronic Packaging and Systems, 25-28, Oct. 2014.

7. Bellan, Diego and Sergio A. Pignari, "Efficient estimation of crosstalk statistics in random wire bundles with lacing cords," IEEE Transactions on Electromagnetic Compatibility, Vol. 53, No. 1, 209-218, 2011.

8. Spadacini, Giordano and Sergio A. Pignari, "Numerical assessment of radiated susceptibility of twisted-wire pairs with random nonuniform twisting," IEEE Transactions on Electromagnetic Compatibility, Vol. 55, No. 5, 956-964, 2013.

9. Jullien, Charles, Philippe Besnier, Michel Dunand, and Isabelle Junqua, "Advanced modeling of crosstalk between an unshielded twisted pair cable and an unshielded wire above a ground plane," IEEE Transactions on Electromagnetic Compatibility, Vol. 55, No. 1, 183-194, 2013.

10. Wang, Tianhao, Yinhan Gao, Le Gao, Chang-Ying Liu, Juxian Wang, and Zhanyang An, "Statistical analysis of crosstalk for automotive wiring harness via polynomial chaos method," Journal of the Balkan Tribological Association, Vol. 22, No. 2, 1503-1517, 2016.

11. Bai, Jinjun, Gang Zhang, Di Wang, Alistair P. Duffy, and Lixin Wang, "Performance comparison of the SGM and the SCM in EMC simulation," IEEE Transactions on Electromagnetic Compatibility, Vol. 58, No. 6, 1739-1746, 2016.

12. Edwards, Robert Stephen, "Uncertainty analyses in computational electromagnetism," University of York, UK, 2009.

13. Bai, Jinjun, Gang Zhang, Lixin Wang, and Tianhao Wang, "Uncertainty analysis in EMC simulation based on improved method of moments," Applied Computational Electromagnetics Society Journal, Vol. 31, No. 1, 66-71, 2016.

14. Fei, Zhouxiang, Yi Huang, Jiafeng Zhou, and Qian Xu, "Uncertainty quantification of crosstalk using stochastic reduced order models," IEEE Transactions on Electromagnetic Compatibility, Vol. 59, No. 1, 228-239, 2017.

15. Ren, Ziyan, Jiangang Ma, Yanli Qi, Dianhai Zhang, and Chang-Seop Koh, "Managing uncertainties of permanent magnet synchronous machine by adaptive Kriging assisted weight index Monte Carlo simulation method," IEEE Transactions on Energy Conversion, Vol. 35, No. 4, 2162-2169, 2020.

16. Bai, Jinjun, Jingchao Sun, and Ning Wang, "Convergence determination of EMC uncertainty simulation based on the improved mean equivalent area method," Applied Computational Electromagnetics Society Journal, Vol. 36, No. 11, 1446-1452, 2021.

17. Bai, Jinjun, Mingzhao Wang, and Xiaolong Li, "Uncertainty analysis method of computational electromagnetics based on clustering Method of Moments," Progress In Electromagnetics Research M, Vol. 114, 37-47, 2022.
doi:10.2528/PIERM22071703

18. Cho, Heyrim, D. Venturi, and G. E. Karniadakis, "Karhunen-Loève expansion for multi-correlated stochastic processes," Probabilistic Engineering Mechanics, Vol. 34, 157-167, 2013.

19. Kale, Mehmet Cemil, "A general biorthogonal wavelet based on Karhunen-Loéve transform approximation," Signal, Image and Video Processing, Vol. 10, No. 4, 791-794, 2016.

20. Nielsen, Eric J. and William L. Kleb, "Efficient construction of discrete adjoint operators on unstructured grids using complex variables," AIAA Journal, Vol. 44, No. 4, 827-836, 2006.
doi:10.2514/1.15830

21. Bai, Jinjun, Jingchao Sun, and Ning Wang, "Convergence determination of EMC uncertainty simulation based on the improved mean equivalent area method," Applied Computational Electromagnetics Society Journal, Vol. 36, No. 11, 1446-1452, Nov. 2021.

22. Bai, Jinjun, Gang Zhang, Di Wang, Alistair P. Duffy, and Lixin Wang, "Performance comparison of the SGM and the SCM in EMC simulation," IEEE Transactions on Electromagnetic Compatibility, Vol. 58, No. 6, 1739-1746, Dec. 2016.

23. IEEE Standard for Validation of Computational Electromagnetics Computer Modeling and Simulations, IEEE STD 15971-2008, 1-41, 2008.

24. IEEE Recommended Practice for Validation of Computational Electromagnetics Computer Modeling and Simulations, IEEE STD 15972-2010, 1-124, 2011.