Vol. 118
Latest Volume
All Volumes
PIERM 127 [2024] PIERM 126 [2024] PIERM 125 [2024] PIERM 124 [2024] PIERM 123 [2024] PIERM 122 [2023] PIERM 121 [2023] PIERM 120 [2023] PIERM 119 [2023] PIERM 118 [2023] PIERM 117 [2023] PIERM 116 [2023] PIERM 115 [2023] PIERM 114 [2022] PIERM 113 [2022] PIERM 112 [2022] PIERM 111 [2022] PIERM 110 [2022] PIERM 109 [2022] PIERM 108 [2022] PIERM 107 [2022] PIERM 106 [2021] PIERM 105 [2021] PIERM 104 [2021] PIERM 103 [2021] PIERM 102 [2021] PIERM 101 [2021] PIERM 100 [2021] PIERM 99 [2021] PIERM 98 [2020] PIERM 97 [2020] PIERM 96 [2020] PIERM 95 [2020] PIERM 94 [2020] PIERM 93 [2020] PIERM 92 [2020] PIERM 91 [2020] PIERM 90 [2020] PIERM 89 [2020] PIERM 88 [2020] PIERM 87 [2019] PIERM 86 [2019] PIERM 85 [2019] PIERM 84 [2019] PIERM 83 [2019] PIERM 82 [2019] PIERM 81 [2019] PIERM 80 [2019] PIERM 79 [2019] PIERM 78 [2019] PIERM 77 [2019] PIERM 76 [2018] PIERM 75 [2018] PIERM 74 [2018] PIERM 73 [2018] PIERM 72 [2018] PIERM 71 [2018] PIERM 70 [2018] PIERM 69 [2018] PIERM 68 [2018] PIERM 67 [2018] PIERM 66 [2018] PIERM 65 [2018] PIERM 64 [2018] PIERM 63 [2018] PIERM 62 [2017] PIERM 61 [2017] PIERM 60 [2017] PIERM 59 [2017] PIERM 58 [2017] PIERM 57 [2017] PIERM 56 [2017] PIERM 55 [2017] PIERM 54 [2017] PIERM 53 [2017] PIERM 52 [2016] PIERM 51 [2016] PIERM 50 [2016] PIERM 49 [2016] PIERM 48 [2016] PIERM 47 [2016] PIERM 46 [2016] PIERM 45 [2016] PIERM 44 [2015] PIERM 43 [2015] PIERM 42 [2015] PIERM 41 [2015] PIERM 40 [2014] PIERM 39 [2014] PIERM 38 [2014] PIERM 37 [2014] PIERM 36 [2014] PIERM 35 [2014] PIERM 34 [2014] PIERM 33 [2013] PIERM 32 [2013] PIERM 31 [2013] PIERM 30 [2013] PIERM 29 [2013] PIERM 28 [2013] PIERM 27 [2012] PIERM 26 [2012] PIERM 25 [2012] PIERM 24 [2012] PIERM 23 [2012] PIERM 22 [2012] PIERM 21 [2011] PIERM 20 [2011] PIERM 19 [2011] PIERM 18 [2011] PIERM 17 [2011] PIERM 16 [2011] PIERM 14 [2010] PIERM 13 [2010] PIERM 12 [2010] PIERM 11 [2010] PIERM 10 [2009] PIERM 9 [2009] PIERM 8 [2009] PIERM 7 [2009] PIERM 6 [2009] PIERM 5 [2008] PIERM 4 [2008] PIERM 3 [2008] PIERM 2 [2008] PIERM 1 [2008]
2023-08-13
Characterization of the Shielding Effectiveness of Composite Materials Using Electromagnetic Methods Covering a Wide Frequency Range
By
Progress In Electromagnetics Research M, Vol. 118, 117-126, 2023
Abstract
Composite materials are being widely used in the automotive industry where they are progressively replacing metallic materials as structural parts for being robust and lightweight. Their complexity, often leading to lots of unknown behavioral effects when placed near the electronic systems present in vehicles, should be studied and treated. In the automotive industry, the shielding effectiveness of these materials should be considered as the most important parameter to be known in advance. Faurecia, one of the world's largest leading automotive suppliers, sought to assess the shielding effectiveness of their product such as dashboards and door trims. Their objective was to enhance the shielding effectiveness, thereby ensuring superior isolation and protection of electronic systems against electromagnetic interferences (EMI). Thus, this paper presents a novel method for characterizing the shielding effectiveness of various composites using two electromagnetic methods to cover a wide frequency range, starting from 10 Hz up to 8 GHz. The first method, based on loop antennas, was used to cover the low frequency range starting from 10 Hz up to 120 MHz. Frequencies between 100 KHz and 1.5 GHz were not discussed in this paper because of the many studies that already exist at this frequency range, using the coaxial transmission cell. The second method used for frequencies higher than 1.5 GHz, consists of ultra-wide band antennas (Vivaldi).
Citation
Rassoul Mansour, Nabil Benjelloun, and Moncef Kadi, "Characterization of the Shielding Effectiveness of Composite Materials Using Electromagnetic Methods Covering a Wide Frequency Range," Progress In Electromagnetics Research M, Vol. 118, 117-126, 2023.
doi:10.2528/PIERM23060503
References

1. Schelkunoff, S. A., "The impedance concept and its application to problems of reflection, refraction, shielding and power absorption," Bell System Technical Journal, Vol. 17, No. 1, 17-48, Jan. 1938.
doi:10.1002/j.1538-7305.1938.tb00774.x

2. Colaneri, N. F. and L. W. Schacklette, "EMI shielding measurements of conductive polymer blends," IEEE Transactions on Instrumentation and Measurement, Vol. 41, No. 2, 291-297, Apr. 1992.
doi:10.1109/19.137363

3. Poulichet, P., Efficacite de blindage des feuilles metalliques, Chapter 2, ESIEE, Paris, Feb. 2004. [Online]. Available: https://perso.esiee.fr/~poulichp/CEM/Blindage_electromagnetique/chapitre2.PDF.

4. Kuhn, M., W. John, and R. Weigel, "Analytical calculation of intrinsic shielding effectiveness for isotropic and anisotropic materials based on measured electrical parameters," Advances in Radio Science, Vol. 12, No. C6, 83-89, Nov. 2014.

5. Loya, S. and H. Khan, "Analysis of shielding effectiveness in the electric field and magnetic field and plane wave for infinite sheet metals," International Journal of Electromagnetics and Applications, Vol. 6, No. 2, 31-41, Jun. 2016.

6. Moser, J. R., "Low-frequency shielding of a circular loop electromagnetic field source," IEEE Transactions on Electromagnetic Compatibility, Vol. 9, No. 1, 6-18, Mar. 1967.
doi:10.1109/TEMC.1967.4307447

7. Casey, K. F., "Electromagnetic shielding behavior of wire-mesh screens," IEEE Transactions on Electromagnetic Compatibility, Vol. 30, No. 3, 298-306, Aug. 1988.
doi:10.1109/15.3309

8. Wilson, P. F. and M. T. Ma, "Techniques for measuring the electromagnetic shielding effectiveness of materials. II. Near-field source simulation," IEEE Transactions on Electromagnetic Compatibility, Vol. 30, No. 3, 251-259, Aug. 1988.
doi:10.1109/15.3303

9. Munalli, D., G. Dimitrakis, D. Chronopoulos, S. Greedy, and A. Long, "Electromagnetic shielding effectiveness of carbon fiber reinforced composites," Composites Part B: Engineering, Vol. 173, Sep. 2019.

10. Yang, S., K. Lozano, A. Lomeli, H. D. Foltz, and R. Jones, "Electromagnetic interference shielding effectiveness of carbon nanofiber/LCP composites," Composites Part A: Applied Science and Manufacturing, Vol. 36, No. 5, 691-697, May 2005.
doi:10.1016/j.compositesa.2004.07.009

11. Wieckowski, T. W. and J. M. Janukiewicz, "Methods for evaluating the shielding effectiveness of textiles," Fibres & Textiles in Eastern Europe, Vol. 5, No. 59, 18-22, 2006.

12. Wilson, P. F., M. T. Ma, and J. W. Adams, "Techniques for measuring the electromagnetic shielding effectiveness of materials. I. Far-field source simulation," IEEE Transactions on Electromagnetic Compatibility, Vol. 30, No. 3, 239-250, 1988.
doi:10.1109/15.3302

13. Chung, D. D. L., "Materials for electromagnetic interference shielding," Journal of Materials Engineering and Performance, Vol. 9, No. 3, 350-354, 2000.
doi:10.1361/105994900770346042

14. Criel, S., L. Martens, and D. De Zutter, "Theoretical and experimental near-field characterization of perforated shields," IEEE Transactions on Electromagnetic Compatibility, Vol. 36, No. 3, 161-168, 1994.
doi:10.1109/15.305460

15. Gooch, J. W. and J. K. Daher, "Fundamentals of electromagnetic shielding," Electromagnetic Shielding and Corrosion Protection for Aerospace Vehicles, 1-70, Springer, New York, NY, Mar. 2007.

16. McDowell, A. and T. Hubing, "Decomposition of shielding effectiveness into absorption and reflection components," Tech. Rep., Clemson University, 2014.

17. Al Achkar, G., L. Pichon, M. Bensetti, and L. Daniel, "Homogenization of metal grid reinforced composites for near-field low-frequency magnetic shielding," Progress In Electromagnetics Research M, Vol. 99, 153-163, 2020.

18. Andrieu, G., J. Panh, A. Reineix, P. Pelissou, C. Girard, X. Romeuf, and D. Schmitt, "Homogenization of composite panels from a near-field magnetic shielding effectiveness measurement," IEEE Transactions on Electromagnetic Compatibility, Vol. 54, No. 3, 700-703, Mar. 2012.
doi:10.1109/TEMC.2012.2186455