Vol. 123
Latest Volume
All Volumes
PIERM 130 [2024] PIERM 129 [2024] PIERM 128 [2024] PIERM 127 [2024] PIERM 126 [2024] PIERM 125 [2024] PIERM 124 [2024] PIERM 123 [2024] PIERM 122 [2023] PIERM 121 [2023] PIERM 120 [2023] PIERM 119 [2023] PIERM 118 [2023] PIERM 117 [2023] PIERM 116 [2023] PIERM 115 [2023] PIERM 114 [2022] PIERM 113 [2022] PIERM 112 [2022] PIERM 111 [2022] PIERM 110 [2022] PIERM 109 [2022] PIERM 108 [2022] PIERM 107 [2022] PIERM 106 [2021] PIERM 105 [2021] PIERM 104 [2021] PIERM 103 [2021] PIERM 102 [2021] PIERM 101 [2021] PIERM 100 [2021] PIERM 99 [2021] PIERM 98 [2020] PIERM 97 [2020] PIERM 96 [2020] PIERM 95 [2020] PIERM 94 [2020] PIERM 93 [2020] PIERM 92 [2020] PIERM 91 [2020] PIERM 90 [2020] PIERM 89 [2020] PIERM 88 [2020] PIERM 87 [2019] PIERM 86 [2019] PIERM 85 [2019] PIERM 84 [2019] PIERM 83 [2019] PIERM 82 [2019] PIERM 81 [2019] PIERM 80 [2019] PIERM 79 [2019] PIERM 78 [2019] PIERM 77 [2019] PIERM 76 [2018] PIERM 75 [2018] PIERM 74 [2018] PIERM 73 [2018] PIERM 72 [2018] PIERM 71 [2018] PIERM 70 [2018] PIERM 69 [2018] PIERM 68 [2018] PIERM 67 [2018] PIERM 66 [2018] PIERM 65 [2018] PIERM 64 [2018] PIERM 63 [2018] PIERM 62 [2017] PIERM 61 [2017] PIERM 60 [2017] PIERM 59 [2017] PIERM 58 [2017] PIERM 57 [2017] PIERM 56 [2017] PIERM 55 [2017] PIERM 54 [2017] PIERM 53 [2017] PIERM 52 [2016] PIERM 51 [2016] PIERM 50 [2016] PIERM 49 [2016] PIERM 48 [2016] PIERM 47 [2016] PIERM 46 [2016] PIERM 45 [2016] PIERM 44 [2015] PIERM 43 [2015] PIERM 42 [2015] PIERM 41 [2015] PIERM 40 [2014] PIERM 39 [2014] PIERM 38 [2014] PIERM 37 [2014] PIERM 36 [2014] PIERM 35 [2014] PIERM 34 [2014] PIERM 33 [2013] PIERM 32 [2013] PIERM 31 [2013] PIERM 30 [2013] PIERM 29 [2013] PIERM 28 [2013] PIERM 27 [2012] PIERM 26 [2012] PIERM 25 [2012] PIERM 24 [2012] PIERM 23 [2012] PIERM 22 [2012] PIERM 21 [2011] PIERM 20 [2011] PIERM 19 [2011] PIERM 18 [2011] PIERM 17 [2011] PIERM 16 [2011] PIERM 14 [2010] PIERM 13 [2010] PIERM 12 [2010] PIERM 11 [2010] PIERM 10 [2009] PIERM 9 [2009] PIERM 8 [2009] PIERM 7 [2009] PIERM 6 [2009] PIERM 5 [2008] PIERM 4 [2008] PIERM 3 [2008] PIERM 2 [2008] PIERM 1 [2008]
2024-01-23
Relaxation of the Courant Condition in the Explicit Finite-Difference Time-Domain(2,6) Method with Third- and Fifth-Degree Differential Terms
By
Progress In Electromagnetics Research M, Vol. 123, 83-93, 2024
Abstract
A new non-dissipative and explicit finite-difference time-domain (FDTD) method is proposed for relaxation of the Courant condition of FDTD(2,6) in three and two dimensions. To the time-development equations, the third- and fifth-degree spatial difference terms with fourth- and second-order accuracy, respectively, are appended with coefficients. A set of optimal coefficients for the appended terms is searched to minimize the numerical error in phase velocity but relax the Courant condition as well. The numerical errors with the new method are more reduced than those with the previous methods for each Courant number. However, there exists a large anisotropy in the phase velocity errors at large Courant numbers.
Citation
Harune Sekido, and Takayuki Umeda, "Relaxation of the Courant Condition in the Explicit Finite-Difference Time-Domain(2,6) Method with Third- and Fifth-Degree Differential Terms," Progress In Electromagnetics Research M, Vol. 123, 83-93, 2024.
doi:10.2528/PIERM23042504
References

1. Yee, Kane, "Numerical solution of initial boundary value problems involving Maxwell's equations in isotropic media," IEEE Transactions on Antennas and Propagation, Vol. 14, No. 3, 302-307, 1966.

2. Taflove, Allen, "Application of the finite-difference time-domain method to sinusoidal steady-state electromagnetic-penetration problems," IEEE Transactions on Electromagnetic Compatibility, Vol. 22, No. 3, 191-202, 1980.

3. Fang, Jiayuan, "Time domain finite difference computation for Maxwell's equations," Ph. D. Thesis, Department of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science, University of California, Berkeley, 1989.

4. Petropoulos, Peter G., "Phase error control for FD-TD methods of second and fourth order accuracy," IEEE Transactions on Antennas and Propagation, Vol. 42, No. 6, 859-862, 1994.

5. Weiland, Thomas, "Time domain electromagnetic field computation with finite difference methods," International Journal of Numerical Modelling: Electronic Networks, Devices and Fields, Vol. 9, No. 4, 295-319, 1996.

6. Thoma, Peter and Thomas Weiland, "Numerical stability of finite difference time domain methods," IEEE Transactions on Magnetics, Vol. 34, No. 5, 2740-2743, 1998.

7. Zhou, Longjian, Feng Yang, and Haijing Zhou, "A novel efficient nonstandard high-order finite-difference time-domain method based on dispersion relation analysis," Electromagnetics, Vol. 35, No. 1, 59-74, 2015.

8. Sun, C. and C. W. Trueman, "Unconditionally stable Crank-Nicolson scheme for solving two-dimensional Maxwell's equations," Electronics Letters, Vol. 39, No. 7, 595-597, 2003.

9. Yang, Y., R. S. Chen, and Edward K. N. Yung, "The unconditionally stable Crank Nicolson FDTD method for three‐dimensional Maxwell's equations," Microwave and Optical Technology Letters, Vol. 48, No. 8, 1619-1622, 2006.

10. Chen, Wei-Jun, Ping Ma, and Jing Tian, "A novel ADE-CN-FDTD with improved computational efficiency for dispersive media," IEEE Microwave and Wireless Components Letters, Vol. 28, No. 10, 849-851, 2018.

11. Namiki, Takefumi, "A new FDTD algorithm based on alternating-direction implicit method," IEEE Transactions on Microwave Theory and Techniques, Vol. 47, No. 10, 2003-2007, 1999.

12. Cooke, S. J., M. Botton, T. M. Antonsen, Jr., and B. Levush, "A leapfrog formulation of the 3‐D ADI‐FDTD algorithm," International Journal of Numerical Modelling: Electronic Networks, Devices and Fields, Vol. 22, No. 2, 187-200, 2009.

13. Wang, Xiang-Hua, Wen-Yan Yin, and Zhi Zhang (David) Chen, "One-step leapfrog ADI-FDTD method for simulating electromagnetic wave propagation in general dispersive media," Optics Express, Vol. 21, No. 18, 20565-20576, 2013.

14. Xie, Guoda, Zhixiang Huang, Ming Fang, and Xianliang Wu, "A unified 3‐D ADI‐FDTD algorithm with one‐step leapfrog approach for modeling frequency‐dependent dispersive media," International Journal of Numerical Modelling: Electronic Networks, Devices and Fields, Vol. 33, No. 2, e2666, 2020.

15. Hadi, Mohammed F. and Melinda Piket-May, "A modified FDTD(2, 4) scheme for modeling electrically large structures with high-phase accuracy," IEEE Transactions on Antennas and Propagation, Vol. 45, No. 2, 254-264, 1997.

16. Cole, James B., "High accuracy solution of Maxwell's equations using nonstandard finite differences," Computers in Physics, Vol. 11, No. 3, 287-292, 1997.

17. Cole, James B., "A high-accuracy realization of the Yee algorithm using non-standard finite differences," IEEE Transactions on Microwave Theory and Techniques, Vol. 45, No. 6, 991-996, 1997.

18. Kudo, Hironori, Tatsuya Kashiwa, and Tadao Ohtani, "Numerical dispersion and stability condition of the nonstandard FDTD method," Electronics and Communications in Japan (Part II: Electronics), Vol. 85, No. 1, 22-30, 2002.

19. Yang, Bo and Constantine A. Balanis, "An isotropy-improved nonstandard finite-difference time-domain method," IEEE Transactions on Antennas and Propagation, Vol. 54, No. 7, 1935-1942, 2006.

20. Ohtani, Tadao, Kenji Taguchi, Tatsuya Kashiwa, Yasushi Kanai, and James B. Cole, "Nonstandard FDTD method for wideband analysis," IEEE Transactions on Antennas and Propagation, Vol. 57, No. 8, 2386-2396, 2009.

21. Sekido, Harune and Takayuki Umeda, "Relaxation of the courant condition in the explicit finite-difference time-domain method with higher-degree differential terms," IEEE Transactions on Antennas and Propagation, Vol. 71, No. 2, 1630-1639, 2023.