Vol. 44
Latest Volume
All Volumes
PIERL 123 [2025] PIERL 122 [2024] PIERL 121 [2024] PIERL 120 [2024] PIERL 119 [2024] PIERL 118 [2024] PIERL 117 [2024] PIERL 116 [2024] PIERL 115 [2024] PIERL 114 [2023] PIERL 113 [2023] PIERL 112 [2023] PIERL 111 [2023] PIERL 110 [2023] PIERL 109 [2023] PIERL 108 [2023] PIERL 107 [2022] PIERL 106 [2022] PIERL 105 [2022] PIERL 104 [2022] PIERL 103 [2022] PIERL 102 [2022] PIERL 101 [2021] PIERL 100 [2021] PIERL 99 [2021] PIERL 98 [2021] PIERL 97 [2021] PIERL 96 [2021] PIERL 95 [2021] PIERL 94 [2020] PIERL 93 [2020] PIERL 92 [2020] PIERL 91 [2020] PIERL 90 [2020] PIERL 89 [2020] PIERL 88 [2020] PIERL 87 [2019] PIERL 86 [2019] PIERL 85 [2019] PIERL 84 [2019] PIERL 83 [2019] PIERL 82 [2019] PIERL 81 [2019] PIERL 80 [2018] PIERL 79 [2018] PIERL 78 [2018] PIERL 77 [2018] PIERL 76 [2018] PIERL 75 [2018] PIERL 74 [2018] PIERL 73 [2018] PIERL 72 [2018] PIERL 71 [2017] PIERL 70 [2017] PIERL 69 [2017] PIERL 68 [2017] PIERL 67 [2017] PIERL 66 [2017] PIERL 65 [2017] PIERL 64 [2016] PIERL 63 [2016] PIERL 62 [2016] PIERL 61 [2016] PIERL 60 [2016] PIERL 59 [2016] PIERL 58 [2016] PIERL 57 [2015] PIERL 56 [2015] PIERL 55 [2015] PIERL 54 [2015] PIERL 53 [2015] PIERL 52 [2015] PIERL 51 [2015] PIERL 50 [2014] PIERL 49 [2014] PIERL 48 [2014] PIERL 47 [2014] PIERL 46 [2014] PIERL 45 [2014] PIERL 44 [2014] PIERL 43 [2013] PIERL 42 [2013] PIERL 41 [2013] PIERL 40 [2013] PIERL 39 [2013] PIERL 38 [2013] PIERL 37 [2013] PIERL 36 [2013] PIERL 35 [2012] PIERL 34 [2012] PIERL 33 [2012] PIERL 32 [2012] PIERL 31 [2012] PIERL 30 [2012] PIERL 29 [2012] PIERL 28 [2012] PIERL 27 [2011] PIERL 26 [2011] PIERL 25 [2011] PIERL 24 [2011] PIERL 23 [2011] PIERL 22 [2011] PIERL 21 [2011] PIERL 20 [2011] PIERL 19 [2010] PIERL 18 [2010] PIERL 17 [2010] PIERL 16 [2010] PIERL 15 [2010] PIERL 14 [2010] PIERL 13 [2010] PIERL 12 [2009] PIERL 11 [2009] PIERL 10 [2009] PIERL 9 [2009] PIERL 8 [2009] PIERL 7 [2009] PIERL 6 [2009] PIERL 5 [2008] PIERL 4 [2008] PIERL 3 [2008] PIERL 2 [2008] PIERL 1 [2008]
2013-12-16
Influence Analysis of Stochastic Translation of Transmission Lines Over Ground
By
Progress In Electromagnetics Research Letters, Vol. 44, 53-61, 2014
Abstract
This paper proposes a method for the quick estimation of the average voltages at terminal loads when the transmission line translate randomly and analyzes the sensitivities of the loads' voltages to the translation. Because nonuniform transmission lines can be approximated as n-cascaded uniform lines, the study of uniform lines is the basis. Based on the transmission-line equations, the equations are derived to estimate the average voltages, the voltage variations, and the sensitivity of the voltage to the random translation when transmission lines have random translation in their cross sections. With these equations, the average voltages at the loads, the probability distributions of the voltage variations, and the sensitivity of the voltage to the random translation can be obtained quickly. A two-wire line over the ground is studied by using the proposed method. The average voltages and the voltage variations' probability distributions agree well with those via the Monte Carlo (MC) method and the proposed method is more efficient. The results show that the sensitivities of the voltages at the loads to the random height increase with the terminal sources but decrease with the height.
Citation
Haiyan Xie, Jianguo Wang, Yong Li, and Chun Xuan, "Influence Analysis of Stochastic Translation of Transmission Lines Over Ground," Progress In Electromagnetics Research Letters, Vol. 44, 53-61, 2014.
doi:10.2528/PIERL13110203
References

1. Capraro, G. T. and C. R. Paul, "A probabilistic approach to wire coupling interference prediction," Proc. IEEE Int. Symp. Electromagn. Compat., 267-272, 1981.

2. Paul, C. R. , "Sensitivity of crosstalk to variations in cable bundles," Proceedings of the 1987 IEEE International Symposium on EMC , 1987.

3. Parkinson, E. R. and P. H. Levy, "Monte carlo analysis of the EMP response of a random-lay cable," IEEE Transactions on Nuclear Science, Vol. 29, No. 6, 1920-1923, 1982.
doi:10.1109/TNS.1982.4336471

4. Ciccolella, A. and F. G. Canavero, "Statistical simulation of crosstalk in Bundles," Proc. 11th Int. Zurich Symp. EMC, 83-88, 1995.

5. Ciccolella, A. and F. G. Canavero, "Stochastic prediction of wire coupling interference," Proceedings of IEEE International Symposium on Electromagnetic Compatibility , 51-56, 1995.
doi:10.1109/ISEMC.1995.523517

6. Sun, S., G. Liu, J. L. Drewniak, et al. "Hand-assembled cable bundle modeling for crosstalk and common-mode radiation prediction," IEEE Transactions on Electromagnetic Compatibility, Vol. 49, No. 3, 708-718, 2007.
doi:10.1109/TEMC.2007.897142

7. Xie, H., J. Wang, S. Li, H. Qiao, and Y. Li, "Analysis and efficient estimation of random wire bundles excited by plane-wave fields," Progress In Electromagnetics Research B, Vol. 35, 167-185, 2011.
doi:10.2528/PIERB11091508

8. Beetner, D. G., H. Weng, M. Wu, et al. "Validation of worst-case and statistical models for an automotive EMC expert system," Proceedings of IEEE International Symposium on Electromagnetic Compatibility, 1-5, 2007.

9. Wu, M., D. G. Beetner, T. H. Hubing, et al. "Estimation of the statistical variation of crosstalk in wiring harness," Proceedings of IEEE International Symposium on Electromagnetic Compatibility, 1-7, 2008.

10. Wu, M., D. G. Beetner, T. H. Hubing, et al. "Statistical prediction of `reasonable worst-case crosstalk in cable bundles'," IEEE Transactions on Electromagnetic Compatibility, Vol. 51, No. 3, 842-851, 2009.
doi:10.1109/TEMC.2009.2026740

11. Dong, X., H. Weng, D. G. Beetner, et al. "Approximation of worst case crosstalk at high," frequencies," IEEE Transactions on Electromagnetic Compatibility, Vol. 53, No. 1, 202-208, 2011.
doi:10.1109/TEMC.2010.2081676

12. Shiran, S., B. Reiser, and H. Cory, "A probabilistic model for the evaluation of coupling between transmission lines," IEEE Transactions on Electromagnetic Compatibility, Vol. 35, No. 3, 387-393, 1993.
doi:10.1109/15.277313

13. Pignari, S., D. Bellan, and L. D. Rienzo, "Statistical estimates of crosstalk in three-conductor transmission line," Proceedings of IEEE International Symposium on Electromagnetic Compatibility, 877-882, 2002.

14. Bellan, D., S. Pignari, and G. Spadacini, "Characterisation of crosstalk in terms of mean value and standard deviation," IEE Proc. | Sci. Meas. Technol., Vol. 150, No. 6, 289-295, 2003.
doi:10.1109/15.385887

15. Besnier P. , P. and P. Degauque, "Electromagnetic topology: Investigation of nonuniform transmission," line networks," IEEE Transactions on Electromagnetic Compatibility, Vol. 37, No. 2, 227-233, 1995.
doi:10.1109/15.618047

16. Omid, M., Y. Kami, and M. Hayakawa, "Field coupling to nonuniform and uniform transmission lines," IEEE Transactions on Electromagnetic Compatibility, Vol. 39, No. 3, 201-211, 1997.

17. Tesche , F. M., M. V. Ianoz, and T. Karlsson, "EMC Analysis Methods and Computational Models," Wiley, 1997.

18. Baum, C. E., T. K. Liu, and F. M. Tesche, "On the analysis of general multiconductor transmission-line network," Interaction Notes 350, 1978.