Vol. 16
Latest Volume
All Volumes
PIERM 130 [2024] PIERM 129 [2024] PIERM 128 [2024] PIERM 127 [2024] PIERM 126 [2024] PIERM 125 [2024] PIERM 124 [2024] PIERM 123 [2024] PIERM 122 [2023] PIERM 121 [2023] PIERM 120 [2023] PIERM 119 [2023] PIERM 118 [2023] PIERM 117 [2023] PIERM 116 [2023] PIERM 115 [2023] PIERM 114 [2022] PIERM 113 [2022] PIERM 112 [2022] PIERM 111 [2022] PIERM 110 [2022] PIERM 109 [2022] PIERM 108 [2022] PIERM 107 [2022] PIERM 106 [2021] PIERM 105 [2021] PIERM 104 [2021] PIERM 103 [2021] PIERM 102 [2021] PIERM 101 [2021] PIERM 100 [2021] PIERM 99 [2021] PIERM 98 [2020] PIERM 97 [2020] PIERM 96 [2020] PIERM 95 [2020] PIERM 94 [2020] PIERM 93 [2020] PIERM 92 [2020] PIERM 91 [2020] PIERM 90 [2020] PIERM 89 [2020] PIERM 88 [2020] PIERM 87 [2019] PIERM 86 [2019] PIERM 85 [2019] PIERM 84 [2019] PIERM 83 [2019] PIERM 82 [2019] PIERM 81 [2019] PIERM 80 [2019] PIERM 79 [2019] PIERM 78 [2019] PIERM 77 [2019] PIERM 76 [2018] PIERM 75 [2018] PIERM 74 [2018] PIERM 73 [2018] PIERM 72 [2018] PIERM 71 [2018] PIERM 70 [2018] PIERM 69 [2018] PIERM 68 [2018] PIERM 67 [2018] PIERM 66 [2018] PIERM 65 [2018] PIERM 64 [2018] PIERM 63 [2018] PIERM 62 [2017] PIERM 61 [2017] PIERM 60 [2017] PIERM 59 [2017] PIERM 58 [2017] PIERM 57 [2017] PIERM 56 [2017] PIERM 55 [2017] PIERM 54 [2017] PIERM 53 [2017] PIERM 52 [2016] PIERM 51 [2016] PIERM 50 [2016] PIERM 49 [2016] PIERM 48 [2016] PIERM 47 [2016] PIERM 46 [2016] PIERM 45 [2016] PIERM 44 [2015] PIERM 43 [2015] PIERM 42 [2015] PIERM 41 [2015] PIERM 40 [2014] PIERM 39 [2014] PIERM 38 [2014] PIERM 37 [2014] PIERM 36 [2014] PIERM 35 [2014] PIERM 34 [2014] PIERM 33 [2013] PIERM 32 [2013] PIERM 31 [2013] PIERM 30 [2013] PIERM 29 [2013] PIERM 28 [2013] PIERM 27 [2012] PIERM 26 [2012] PIERM 25 [2012] PIERM 24 [2012] PIERM 23 [2012] PIERM 22 [2012] PIERM 21 [2011] PIERM 20 [2011] PIERM 19 [2011] PIERM 18 [2011] PIERM 17 [2011] PIERM 16 [2011] PIERM 14 [2010] PIERM 13 [2010] PIERM 12 [2010] PIERM 11 [2010] PIERM 10 [2009] PIERM 9 [2009] PIERM 8 [2009] PIERM 7 [2009] PIERM 6 [2009] PIERM 5 [2008] PIERM 4 [2008] PIERM 3 [2008] PIERM 2 [2008] PIERM 1 [2008]
2010-11-12
A New Algorithm of 3D Image Reconstruction of Radar Targets from Ramp Responses in Low Frequency
By
Progress In Electromagnetics Research M, Vol. 16, 1-18, 2011
Abstract
Low frequency imaging in radar domain can have applications for stealthy or buried targets. The transient scattering response from a ramp waveform is related to the profile function of the target, namely its transverse cross-sectional area along the line-of-sight, and thus provides information about the target size, orientation and geometrical shape. Such ramp responses can be used to generate a 3-dimensional image of the global shape of the target. Former imaging algorithm uses approximate limiting surfaces and is therefore limited to single convex objects. Here is proposed a new algorithm able to reconstruct non-convex as well as separated targets, from their ramp response signatures.
Citation
Janic Chauveau, and Nicole de Beaucoudrey, "A New Algorithm of 3D Image Reconstruction of Radar Targets from Ramp Responses in Low Frequency," Progress In Electromagnetics Research M, Vol. 16, 1-18, 2011.
doi:10.2528/PIERM10070805
References

1. Colton, D. and R. Kress, Inverse Acoustic and Electromagnetic Scattering Theory, 2 Ed., Series: Applied Mathematical Sciences, Vol. 93, Springer-Verlag, 1998.

2. Solimene, R., A. Brancaccio, R. Di Napoli, and R. Pierri, "3D sliced tomographic inverse scattering experimental results," Progress In Electromagnetics Research, Vol. 105, 1-13, 2010.

3. Chavent, G. and P. C. Sabatier, Proceedings of Inverse Problems of Wave Propagation and Diffraction, Vol. 486, Lecture Notes in Physics, Springer, 1997.

4. Bojarski, N. N., Three-dimensional Electromagnetic Short Pulse Inverse Scattering, Syracuse University, Res. Corp., Feb. 1967.

5. Young, J. D., "Radar imaging from ramp response signatures," IEEE Trans. Ant. Prop., Vol. 24, 276-282, May 1976.

6. Kennaugh, E. M. and D. L. Moffatt, "Transient and impulse response approximations," Proceedings of the IEEE, Vol. 53, 893-901, 1965.

7. Shubert, K. A., J. D. Young, and D. L. Moffatt, "Synthetic radar imagery," IEEE Trans. Ant. Prop., Vol. 25, 477-483, Jul. 1977.

8. Moffatt, D. L., "Ramp response radar imagery spectral content," IEEE Trans. Ant. Prop., Vol. 29, 399-401, Mar. 1981.

9. Nag, S. and L. Peters Jr., "Radar images of penetrable targets generated from ramp profile functions," IEEE Trans. Ant. Prop., Vol. 49, 32-40, Jan. 2001.

10. Chen, C.-C. and L. Peters Jr., "Radar scattering and target imaging obtained using ramp-response techniques," Antennas and Propagation Magazine, Vol. 49, No. 3, 13-27, Jun. 2007.

11. Moffatt, D. L., J. D. Young, A. A. Ksienski, H.-C. Lin, and C. M. Rhoads, "Transient response characteristics in identification and imaging," IEEE Trans. Ant. Prop., Vol. 29, 192-204, Mar. 1981.

12. Nag, S. and L. Peters Jr., "Ramp response signatures of dielectric targets, especially land mines," Geoscience and Remote Sensing Symposium Proceedings, Vol. 1, 213-315, Jul. 1998.

13. Chen, C.-C. and L. Peters Jr., "Ramp response signatures for UXOs," Geoscience and Remote Sensing Symposium Proceedings, Vol. 4, 1436-1438, 2000.

14. Young, J. D., "Target imaging from multiple frequency radar returns,", Ph.D. Dissertation, The Ohio State University, Columbus, Jun. 1971.

15. Nag, S., "Ramp response signatures of dielectric scatterers,", Ph.D. Dissertation, The Ohio State University, Columbus, Dec. 1999.

16. Zhang, X. M., W. Lib, and G. R. Liu, "A new technique in ramp response for acoustic imaging of underwater objects," Applied Acoustics, Vol. 63, 453-465, 2002.

17. Li, W., G. R. Liu, and V. K. Varadan, "Acoustical imaging of underwater objects using the bistatic ramp response signals," IOP, Smart Mater. Struct., Vol. 13, 169-174, 2004.

18. Chauveau, J. and N. de Beaucoudrey, "Ramp response radar imaging: Analysis of frequency parameters," European Microwave Week 2010 (EuMW), Paris, France, Sep. 26-Oct. 1, 2010.

19. Chauveau, J. and N. de Beaucoudrey, "Characterization of details of large targets with the low-frequency ramp response technique," IEEE International Symposium on Antennas and Propagation and CNC/USNC/URSI Radio Science Meeting, Toronto, Ontario, Canada, Jul. 11-17, 2010.

20. Chauveau, J., N. de Beaucoudrey, and J. Saillard, "Radar target imaging from ramp responses using low frequency extrapolation," Progress In Electromagnetics Research Symposium Abstracts, 18-21, Moscow, Russia, Aug. 18-21, 2009.

21. FEKO, Software of Electromagnetic Simulations, http://www.feko.info.

22. Tsao, S.-J. J., "Image reconstruction using ramp response signatures,", Ph.D. Dissertation, The Pennsylvania State University, May 1985.

23. Chauveau, J. and N. de Beaucoudrey, "Low frequency imaging of separated objects using the ramp response technique," IEEE International Symposium on Antennas and Propagation and CNC/USNC/URSI Radio Science Meeting, Toronto, Ontario, Canada, Jul. 11-17, 2010.