Vol. 1
Latest Volume
All Volumes
PIERL 123 [2025] PIERL 122 [2024] PIERL 121 [2024] PIERL 120 [2024] PIERL 119 [2024] PIERL 118 [2024] PIERL 117 [2024] PIERL 116 [2024] PIERL 115 [2024] PIERL 114 [2023] PIERL 113 [2023] PIERL 112 [2023] PIERL 111 [2023] PIERL 110 [2023] PIERL 109 [2023] PIERL 108 [2023] PIERL 107 [2022] PIERL 106 [2022] PIERL 105 [2022] PIERL 104 [2022] PIERL 103 [2022] PIERL 102 [2022] PIERL 101 [2021] PIERL 100 [2021] PIERL 99 [2021] PIERL 98 [2021] PIERL 97 [2021] PIERL 96 [2021] PIERL 95 [2021] PIERL 94 [2020] PIERL 93 [2020] PIERL 92 [2020] PIERL 91 [2020] PIERL 90 [2020] PIERL 89 [2020] PIERL 88 [2020] PIERL 87 [2019] PIERL 86 [2019] PIERL 85 [2019] PIERL 84 [2019] PIERL 83 [2019] PIERL 82 [2019] PIERL 81 [2019] PIERL 80 [2018] PIERL 79 [2018] PIERL 78 [2018] PIERL 77 [2018] PIERL 76 [2018] PIERL 75 [2018] PIERL 74 [2018] PIERL 73 [2018] PIERL 72 [2018] PIERL 71 [2017] PIERL 70 [2017] PIERL 69 [2017] PIERL 68 [2017] PIERL 67 [2017] PIERL 66 [2017] PIERL 65 [2017] PIERL 64 [2016] PIERL 63 [2016] PIERL 62 [2016] PIERL 61 [2016] PIERL 60 [2016] PIERL 59 [2016] PIERL 58 [2016] PIERL 57 [2015] PIERL 56 [2015] PIERL 55 [2015] PIERL 54 [2015] PIERL 53 [2015] PIERL 52 [2015] PIERL 51 [2015] PIERL 50 [2014] PIERL 49 [2014] PIERL 48 [2014] PIERL 47 [2014] PIERL 46 [2014] PIERL 45 [2014] PIERL 44 [2014] PIERL 43 [2013] PIERL 42 [2013] PIERL 41 [2013] PIERL 40 [2013] PIERL 39 [2013] PIERL 38 [2013] PIERL 37 [2013] PIERL 36 [2013] PIERL 35 [2012] PIERL 34 [2012] PIERL 33 [2012] PIERL 32 [2012] PIERL 31 [2012] PIERL 30 [2012] PIERL 29 [2012] PIERL 28 [2012] PIERL 27 [2011] PIERL 26 [2011] PIERL 25 [2011] PIERL 24 [2011] PIERL 23 [2011] PIERL 22 [2011] PIERL 21 [2011] PIERL 20 [2011] PIERL 19 [2010] PIERL 18 [2010] PIERL 17 [2010] PIERL 16 [2010] PIERL 15 [2010] PIERL 14 [2010] PIERL 13 [2010] PIERL 12 [2009] PIERL 11 [2009] PIERL 10 [2009] PIERL 9 [2009] PIERL 8 [2009] PIERL 7 [2009] PIERL 6 [2009] PIERL 5 [2008] PIERL 4 [2008] PIERL 3 [2008] PIERL 2 [2008] PIERL 1 [2008]
2007-12-13
Numerical Method of Simulation of Material Influences in Mr Tomography
By
Progress In Electromagnetics Research Letters, Vol. 1, 205-210, 2008
Abstract
Generally all Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) techniques are affected by magnetic and electric properties of measured materials, resulting in errors in MR image. Using numerical simulation we can solve the effect of changes in homogeneity of static and RF magnetic fields caused by specimen made from conductive and/or magnetic material in MR tomograph. This paper deals with numerical simulation of material susceptibility influence to magnetic field.
Citation
Miloslav Steinbauer, Radek Kubasek, and Karel Bartusek, "Numerical Method of Simulation of Material Influences in Mr Tomography," Progress In Electromagnetics Research Letters, Vol. 1, 205-210, 2008.
doi:10.2528/PIERL07120605
References

1. Ernst, R. R., G. Bodenhausen, and A.Wokaun, Principles of NMR in One and Two Dimensions, Oxford Science Publishing, 1987.

2. Sepulveda, N. G., I. M. Thomas, J. P. Wikswo, and Jr., "Magnetic susceptibility tomography for three-dimensional imaging of diamagnetic and paramagnetic objects," IEEE Transaction on Magnetics, Vol. 30, No. 6, 5062-5069, 1994.
doi:10.1109/20.334296

3. Kubasek, R., M. Steinbauer, and K. Bartusek, "Material influences in MR tomography, measurement and simulation," Journal of Electrical Engineering, Vol. 8, 58-61, Zilina, 2006.

4. Wang, Z. J., S. Li, and J. C. Hasselgrove, "Magnetic resonance imaging measurement of volume magnetic susceptibility using a boundary condition," Journal of Magnetic Resonance, Vol. 142, 477-481, 1999.
doi:10.1006/jmre.1999.1873

5. Hwang, S. N. and F. W. Wehrli, "Experimental evaluation of surface charge method for computing the induced magnetic field in trabecular bone," Journal of Magnetic Resonance, Vol. 139, 35-45, 1999.
doi:10.1006/jmre.1999.1744

6. Eastham, J. F., R. J. Hill-Cottingham, I. R. Young, and J. V. Hajnal, "A method of inverse calculation for regions of small susceptibility variations," IEEE Transaction on Magnetics, Vol. 33, No. 2, 1212-1215, 1997.
doi:10.1109/20.582471

7. Eastham, J. F., R. J. Hill-Cottingham, I. R. Young, J. V. Hajnal, P. J. Leonard, and W. Lin, "Use of finite element analysis to calculate field changes in low susceptibility materials," Proceedings of Compumag 95 International Conference, 546-547, Berlin, Germany, 1995.

8. Steinbauer, M., "Magnetic susceptibility measurement using MRI methods,", Ph.D. thesis, Brno University of Technology, 2005.