Vol. 124
Latest Volume
All Volumes
PIERM 130 [2024] PIERM 129 [2024] PIERM 128 [2024] PIERM 127 [2024] PIERM 126 [2024] PIERM 125 [2024] PIERM 124 [2024] PIERM 123 [2024] PIERM 122 [2023] PIERM 121 [2023] PIERM 120 [2023] PIERM 119 [2023] PIERM 118 [2023] PIERM 117 [2023] PIERM 116 [2023] PIERM 115 [2023] PIERM 114 [2022] PIERM 113 [2022] PIERM 112 [2022] PIERM 111 [2022] PIERM 110 [2022] PIERM 109 [2022] PIERM 108 [2022] PIERM 107 [2022] PIERM 106 [2021] PIERM 105 [2021] PIERM 104 [2021] PIERM 103 [2021] PIERM 102 [2021] PIERM 101 [2021] PIERM 100 [2021] PIERM 99 [2021] PIERM 98 [2020] PIERM 97 [2020] PIERM 96 [2020] PIERM 95 [2020] PIERM 94 [2020] PIERM 93 [2020] PIERM 92 [2020] PIERM 91 [2020] PIERM 90 [2020] PIERM 89 [2020] PIERM 88 [2020] PIERM 87 [2019] PIERM 86 [2019] PIERM 85 [2019] PIERM 84 [2019] PIERM 83 [2019] PIERM 82 [2019] PIERM 81 [2019] PIERM 80 [2019] PIERM 79 [2019] PIERM 78 [2019] PIERM 77 [2019] PIERM 76 [2018] PIERM 75 [2018] PIERM 74 [2018] PIERM 73 [2018] PIERM 72 [2018] PIERM 71 [2018] PIERM 70 [2018] PIERM 69 [2018] PIERM 68 [2018] PIERM 67 [2018] PIERM 66 [2018] PIERM 65 [2018] PIERM 64 [2018] PIERM 63 [2018] PIERM 62 [2017] PIERM 61 [2017] PIERM 60 [2017] PIERM 59 [2017] PIERM 58 [2017] PIERM 57 [2017] PIERM 56 [2017] PIERM 55 [2017] PIERM 54 [2017] PIERM 53 [2017] PIERM 52 [2016] PIERM 51 [2016] PIERM 50 [2016] PIERM 49 [2016] PIERM 48 [2016] PIERM 47 [2016] PIERM 46 [2016] PIERM 45 [2016] PIERM 44 [2015] PIERM 43 [2015] PIERM 42 [2015] PIERM 41 [2015] PIERM 40 [2014] PIERM 39 [2014] PIERM 38 [2014] PIERM 37 [2014] PIERM 36 [2014] PIERM 35 [2014] PIERM 34 [2014] PIERM 33 [2013] PIERM 32 [2013] PIERM 31 [2013] PIERM 30 [2013] PIERM 29 [2013] PIERM 28 [2013] PIERM 27 [2012] PIERM 26 [2012] PIERM 25 [2012] PIERM 24 [2012] PIERM 23 [2012] PIERM 22 [2012] PIERM 21 [2011] PIERM 20 [2011] PIERM 19 [2011] PIERM 18 [2011] PIERM 17 [2011] PIERM 16 [2011] PIERM 14 [2010] PIERM 13 [2010] PIERM 12 [2010] PIERM 11 [2010] PIERM 10 [2009] PIERM 9 [2009] PIERM 8 [2009] PIERM 7 [2009] PIERM 6 [2009] PIERM 5 [2008] PIERM 4 [2008] PIERM 3 [2008] PIERM 2 [2008] PIERM 1 [2008]
2024-03-05
Power Mapping Studies on the Coil Connection of an Interior and Embedded Permanent Magnet Double Stator Generator
By
Progress In Electromagnetics Research M, Vol. 124, 115-123, 2024
Abstract
The increased electrical demand in electrical machines promotes the improvement in power density in double stator systems. The power mapping performance and density of a novel type of interior embedded permanent magnet for a double-stator generator (IEDSG) is investigated in this work. This study investigates the basic attributes of the proposed IEDSG by analyzing various load resistances and changing rotor speeds. The Finite Element Method (FEM) is used to model the generation capabilities that consider electromagnetic properties such as flux density and flux lines. The proposed IEDSG is then manufactured and tested in a laboratory environment to assess how effectively it will perform when being paired with a load circuit. The efficiencies of two unique coil connections - series coil and independent coil - are evaluated and compared. According to the experimental results, when operating at an 800-rpm rotating speed, the independent-coil connection delivers a peak power output of 1688 W, a 16% improvement over the series-coil connection.
Citation
Nur Amira Ibrahim, Norhisam Misron, Hairul Faizi Hairulnizam, Chockalingam Aravind, Farzilah Mailah Nashiren, and Ishak Aris, "Power Mapping Studies on the Coil Connection of an Interior and Embedded Permanent Magnet Double Stator Generator," Progress In Electromagnetics Research M, Vol. 124, 115-123, 2024.
doi:10.2528/PIERM23091404
References

1. Krause, Paul, Oleg Wasynczuk, Scott D. Sudhoff, and Steven Pekarek, Analysis of Electric Machinery and Drive Systems, 3rd Ed., Vol. 2, 121-141, IEEE Press, 2013.
doi:10.1002/9781118524336.ch4

2. Lin, Hai, Kyu-Yun Hwang, and Byung-Il Kwon, "An improved flux observer for sensorless permanent magnet synchronous motor drives with parameter identification," Journal of Electrical Engineering and Technology, Vol. 8, No. 3, 516-523, 2013.

3. Mohammad, Rezazadeh Mehrjou, Norman Mariun, Norhisam Misron, Mohd Amran Mohd Radzi, and Suleiman Musa, "Broken rotor bar detection in LS-PMSM based on startup current analysis using wavelet entropy features," Applied Sciences, Vol. 7, No. 8, 845, 2017.

4. Rucker, Jonathan E., James L. Kirtley, and Tomothy J. McCoy, "Design and analysis of a permanent magnet generator for naval applications," IEEE Electric Ship Technologies Symposium, 451-458, 2005.

5. Lindh, Tuomo, Pia Salminen, Juha Pyrhonen, Markku Niemela, Janne Kinnunen, and Jorma Haataja, "Permanent magnet generator designing guidelines," 2007 International Conference on Power Engineering, Energy and Electrical Drives, 185-189, 2007.

6. Gieras, Jacek F., Rong-Jie Wang, and Maarten J. Kamper, Axial Flux Permanent Magnet Brushless Machines, Kluwer Acadenic Publisher, London, 2004.

7. Hendershot, James R. and Timothy John Eastham Miller, Design of Brushless Permanent-Magnet Machines, Motor Design Books, LLC, UK, 2010.

8. Do, Ton Duc, Sangshin Kwak, Han Ho Choi, and Jin-Woo Jung, "Suboptimal control scheme design for interior permanent-magnet synchronous motors: An SDRE-based approach," IEEE Transactions on Power Electronics, Vol. 29, No. 6, 3020-3031, 2014.

9. Pellegrino, Gianmario, Alfredo Vagati, Paolo Guglielmi, and Barbara Boazzo, "Performance comparison between surface-mounted and interior PM motor drives for electric vehicle application," IEEE Transactions on Industrial Electronics, Vol. 59, No. 2, 803-811, 2012.

10. Yu, Dong, X. Y. Huang, Y. T. Fang, and Jian Zhang, "Design and comparison of interior permanent magnet synchronous traction motors for high speed railway applications," 2017 IEEE Workshop on Electrical Machines Design, Control and Diagnosis (WEMDCD), 58-62, Nottingham, UK, 2017.

11. Chai, Feng, Shumei Cui, and Shukang Cheng, "Performance analysis of double-stator starter generator for the hybrid electric vehicle," IEEE Transactions on Magnetics, Vol. 41, No. 1, 484-487, Jan. 2005.
doi:10.1109/TMAG.2004.839274

12. Chau, K. T., Y. B. Li, J. Z. Jiang, and Chunhua Liu, "Design and analysis of a stator-doubly-fed doubly-salient permanent-magnet machine for automotive engines," IEEE Transactions on Magnetics, Vol. 42, No. 10, 3470-3472, 2006.

13. Liu, Chunhua, K. T. Chau, J. Z. Jiang, and Linni Jian, "Design of a new outer-rotor permanent magnet hybrid machine for wind power generation," IEEE Transactions on Magnetics, Vol. 44, No. 6, 1494-1497, 2008.

14. Norhisam, M., M. Norafiza, and C. Y. Sia, "Double stator type permanent magnet generator," 2009 IEEE Student Conference on Research and Development (SCOReD), 316-319, 2009.

15. Wang, Yunchong, Shuangxia Niu, and Weinong Fu, "Electromagnetic performance analysis of novel flux-regulatable permanent magnet machines for wide constant-power speed range operation," Energies, Vol. 8, No. 12, 13971-13984, 2015.

16. Misron, Norhisam Bin, Suhairi Rizuan Che Ahmad, Raja Nor Firdaus, Chockalingam Aravind, Hiroyuki Wakiwaka, and Masami Nirei, "Comparative evaluation on power-speed density of portable permanent magnet generators for agricultural application," Progress In Electromagnetics Research, Vol. 129, 345-363, 2012.

17. Zheng, Ping, Qian Wu, Jingang Bai, Chengde Tong, and Zhiyi Song, "Analysis and experiment of a novel brushless double rotor machine for power-split hybrid electrical vehicle applications," Energies, Vol. 6, No. 7, 3209-3223, 2013.

18. Vaithilingam, Chockalingam Aravind, Norhisam Misron, Mohammad Reza Zare, Ishak Aris, and Mohammad Hamiruce Marhaban, "Computation of electromagnetic torque in a double rotor switched reluctance motor using flux tube methods," Energies, Vol. 5, No. 10, 4008-4026, 2012.

19. Liu, Jinglin, Chao Gong, Zexiu Han, and Haozheng Yu, "IPMSM model predictive control in flux-weakening operation using an improved algorithm," IEEE Transactions on Industrial Electronics, Vol. 65, No. 12, 9378-9387, 2018.

20. Uddin, Mohammad Nasir and Md. Mizanur Rahman, "Online torque-flux estimation-based nonlinear torque and flux control scheme of IPMSM drive for reduced torque ripples," IEEE Transactions on Power Electronics, Vol. 34, No. 1, 636-645, 2019.

21. Norhisam, M., R. Suhairi, M. Norafiza, M. A. M Radzi, I. Aris, M. Nirei, and H. Wakiwaka, "Comparison on performance of single phase and three phase double stator type permanent magnet generator," Asia-Pacific Symposium on Applied Electromagnetics and Mechanics, 231-234, Kuala Lumpur, 2010.

22. Norhisam, M., M. Norafiza, M. Nirei, H. Wakiwaka, M. Syafiq, and I. Aris, "Comparison on performance of a single and double stator of a slot-less permanent magnet generator," 21st Symposium on Elctromagnetis and Dynamics, 561-564, 2009.

23. Song, Tengfei, Zhenyang Zhang, Huijuan Liu, and WenLuan Hu, "Multi-objective optimisation design and performance comparison of permanent magnet synchronous motor for EVs based on FEA," IET Electric Power Applications, Vol. 13, No. 8, 1157-1166, 2019.

24. Jian, Linni, K. T. Chau, and J. Z. Jiang, "A magnetic-geared outer-rotor permanent-magnet brushless machine for wind power generation," IEEE Transactions on Industry Applications, Vol. 45, No. 3, 954-962, 2009.