Vol. 118
Latest Volume
All Volumes
PIERM 130 [2024] PIERM 129 [2024] PIERM 128 [2024] PIERM 127 [2024] PIERM 126 [2024] PIERM 125 [2024] PIERM 124 [2024] PIERM 123 [2024] PIERM 122 [2023] PIERM 121 [2023] PIERM 120 [2023] PIERM 119 [2023] PIERM 118 [2023] PIERM 117 [2023] PIERM 116 [2023] PIERM 115 [2023] PIERM 114 [2022] PIERM 113 [2022] PIERM 112 [2022] PIERM 111 [2022] PIERM 110 [2022] PIERM 109 [2022] PIERM 108 [2022] PIERM 107 [2022] PIERM 106 [2021] PIERM 105 [2021] PIERM 104 [2021] PIERM 103 [2021] PIERM 102 [2021] PIERM 101 [2021] PIERM 100 [2021] PIERM 99 [2021] PIERM 98 [2020] PIERM 97 [2020] PIERM 96 [2020] PIERM 95 [2020] PIERM 94 [2020] PIERM 93 [2020] PIERM 92 [2020] PIERM 91 [2020] PIERM 90 [2020] PIERM 89 [2020] PIERM 88 [2020] PIERM 87 [2019] PIERM 86 [2019] PIERM 85 [2019] PIERM 84 [2019] PIERM 83 [2019] PIERM 82 [2019] PIERM 81 [2019] PIERM 80 [2019] PIERM 79 [2019] PIERM 78 [2019] PIERM 77 [2019] PIERM 76 [2018] PIERM 75 [2018] PIERM 74 [2018] PIERM 73 [2018] PIERM 72 [2018] PIERM 71 [2018] PIERM 70 [2018] PIERM 69 [2018] PIERM 68 [2018] PIERM 67 [2018] PIERM 66 [2018] PIERM 65 [2018] PIERM 64 [2018] PIERM 63 [2018] PIERM 62 [2017] PIERM 61 [2017] PIERM 60 [2017] PIERM 59 [2017] PIERM 58 [2017] PIERM 57 [2017] PIERM 56 [2017] PIERM 55 [2017] PIERM 54 [2017] PIERM 53 [2017] PIERM 52 [2016] PIERM 51 [2016] PIERM 50 [2016] PIERM 49 [2016] PIERM 48 [2016] PIERM 47 [2016] PIERM 46 [2016] PIERM 45 [2016] PIERM 44 [2015] PIERM 43 [2015] PIERM 42 [2015] PIERM 41 [2015] PIERM 40 [2014] PIERM 39 [2014] PIERM 38 [2014] PIERM 37 [2014] PIERM 36 [2014] PIERM 35 [2014] PIERM 34 [2014] PIERM 33 [2013] PIERM 32 [2013] PIERM 31 [2013] PIERM 30 [2013] PIERM 29 [2013] PIERM 28 [2013] PIERM 27 [2012] PIERM 26 [2012] PIERM 25 [2012] PIERM 24 [2012] PIERM 23 [2012] PIERM 22 [2012] PIERM 21 [2011] PIERM 20 [2011] PIERM 19 [2011] PIERM 18 [2011] PIERM 17 [2011] PIERM 16 [2011] PIERM 14 [2010] PIERM 13 [2010] PIERM 12 [2010] PIERM 11 [2010] PIERM 10 [2009] PIERM 9 [2009] PIERM 8 [2009] PIERM 7 [2009] PIERM 6 [2009] PIERM 5 [2008] PIERM 4 [2008] PIERM 3 [2008] PIERM 2 [2008] PIERM 1 [2008]
2023-09-08
Deep Flux Weakening Control of IPMSM Based on d -Axis Current Error Integral Regulator
By
Progress In Electromagnetics Research M, Vol. 118, 163-175, 2023
Abstract
The deep flux weakening (FW) switching point of the interior permanent magnet synchronous motor (IPMSM) is difficult to track accurately. After entering the deep FW region, the current regulator is easily saturated, and the current following capability is poor. Aiming at these problems, a deep FW control of the IPMSM based on thed-axis current error integral regulator (DCEIR) is proposed. Firstly, the deep FW switching point is accurately calculated by using the maximum torque per volt (MPTV) as the limit of the d-axis current. Secondly, through the study of the voltage deviation, it is found that the q-axis regulating current is related to the DCEIR. On this basis, a new transformation relationship between d-axis current and q-axis current in the deep FW region is obtained. Finally, the simulation and experiment results are compared with the conventional negative d-axis current compensation method (NDCCM). It is verified that the proposed method can successfully restrain the saturation of the current regulator and enhance the current following capability in the deep FW region.
Citation
Zhixuan Yi, Xiangfei Li, Yang Yin, Junqin Liu, and Kaihui Zhao, "Deep Flux Weakening Control of IPMSM Based on d -Axis Current Error Integral Regulator," Progress In Electromagnetics Research M, Vol. 118, 163-175, 2023.
doi:10.2528/PIERM23080101
References

1. Zhang, X., Z. Zhao, and C. Xu, "A flux-weakening method for PMSM based model predictive direct speed control," 2020 IEEE 9th International Power Electronics and Motion Control Conference (IPEMC2020-ECCE Asia), 2557-2561, IEEE, 2020.
doi:10.1109/IPEMC-ECCEAsia48364.2020.9368078

2. Yuniarto, M. N., I. Sidharta, Y. Yohanes, et al. "On the development and experimental validation of a novel and intuitive interior permanent magnet synchronous motor controller for electric vehicle application," World Electric Vehicle Journal, Vol. 13, No. 6, 107, 2022.
doi:10.3390/wevj13060107

3. Tan, B., H. Chen, X. Li, et al. "Torque-current lookup table establishment method for PMSM considering parameter nonlinear characteristics," 2022 25th International Conference on Electrical Machines and Systems (ICEMS), 1-6, IEEE, 2022.

4. Qian, X., X. Guo, H. Qin, et al. "Research on the application of flux-weakening control in PMSM with wide range speed variation," 2017 International Conference on Smart Grid and Electrical Automation (ICSGEA), 371-374, IEEE, 2017.
doi:10.1109/ICSGEA.2017.32

5. Miguel-Espinar, C., D. Heredero-Peris, G. Gross, et al. "Maximum torque per voltage flux-weakening strategy with speed limiter for PMSM drives," IEEE Transactions on Industrial Electronics, Vol. 68, No. 10, 9254-9264, 2020.
doi:10.1109/TIE.2020.3020029

6. Pan, Y., X. Liu, Y. Zhu, and Z. Li, "A leading angle flux weakening control method for PMSM based on active disturbance rejection control," Progress In Electromagnetics Research C, Vol. 121, 29-38, 2022.
doi:10.2528/PIERC22051608

7. Xu, Y., W. Zhang, and D. Sun, "Comparative research of two flux-weakening method of PMSMs in high speed range," 2017 20th International Conference on Electrical Machines and Systems (ICEMS), 1-5, IEEE, 2017.

8. Lee, H., G. Lee, G. Kim, et al. "Variable incremental controller of permanent-magnet synchronous motor for voltage-based flux-weakening control," Energies, Vol. 15, No. 15, 5733, 2022.
doi:10.3390/en15155733

9. Zheng, X., Y. Xi, L. Zhang, et al. "Review of flux weakening control methods of permanent magnet synchronous motor," Automation Application, Vol. 12, 1-3+6, 2019.

10. Liu, Y., X. Wu, and Q. Li, "Permanent magnet synchronous motor nonlinear regulator MTPA flux weakening control," Mechanical and Electrical Information, Vol. 1, 11-15, 2023.

11. Sepulchre, L., M. Fadel, M. Pietrzak-David, et al. "New high speed PMSM flux-weakening strategy," 2016 19th International Conference on Electrical Machines and Systems (ICEMS), 1-6, IEEE, 2016.

12. Li, S., J. Su, and G. Yang, "Flux weakening control strategy of permanent magnet synchronous motor based on active disturbance rejection control," Journal of Electrotechnics, Vol. 37, No. 23, 6135-6144, 2022.

13. Lutonin, A., A. Shklyarskiy, Y. Shklyarskiy, and , "Operation modes and control algorithms of anisotropic permanent magnet synchronous motor (IPMSM)," E3S Web of Conferences, Vol. 140, 10006, 2019.
doi:10.1051/e3sconf/201914010006

14. Dong, W., S. Li, Y. Gao, et al. "Neural network with cloud-based training for MTPA, ux- weakening and MTPV control of IPM motors and drives," IEEE Transactions on Transportation Electrification, IEEE, 2023.

15. Wang, J., C. Ren, Z. Liu, et al. "Research on direct drive technology of the permanent magnet synchronous motor for urban rail vehicles," Mathematical Problems in Engineering, 2022.

16. Cao, C., Z. Lan, F. Shen, et al. "Deep flux weakening control of interior permanent magnet synchronous motor based on quadrature-axis current compensation," Micromotors, Vol. 55, No. 1, 63-70, 2022.

17. Xiao, R., S. Peng, and Z. Huang, "A novel deep flux weakening control strategy for IPMSM," The Proceedings of the 16th Annual Conference of China Electrotechnical Society: Volume II, 279-290, Springer Nature, Singapore, 2022.

18. Zhu, L., X. Wen, F. Zhao, et al. "Control policies to prevent PMSMs from losing control under field-weakening operation," Proceedings of the CSEE, Vol. 31, No. 18, 67-72, 2011.

19. Shi, W. and X. Jin, "A permanent magnet synchronous motor q-axis current error integral feedback depth field-weakening control strategy," Electric Machines and Control Applications, Vol. 45, No. 7, 23-29, 2018.

20. Zhu, L., X. Wang, and H. Zhu, "An IPMSM deep flux weakening algorithm with calculable parameters to avoid out-of-control," Proceedings of the CSEE, Vol. 40, No. 10, 3328-3336, 2020.

21. Zhou, H., L. Chen, G. Liu, et al. "Flux-weakening strategy for improving PMSM dynamic performance," Electric Machines and Control, Vol. 18, No. 9, 23-29, 2014.

22. Wang, A., X. Jia, and L. Zhang, "A new flux-weakening control strategy considering voltage saturation for IPMSM drives," Proceedings of the 31st Chinese Control Conference, 4295-4299, IEEE, 2012.