Vol. 116
Latest Volume
All Volumes
PIERM 130 [2024] PIERM 129 [2024] PIERM 128 [2024] PIERM 127 [2024] PIERM 126 [2024] PIERM 125 [2024] PIERM 124 [2024] PIERM 123 [2024] PIERM 122 [2023] PIERM 121 [2023] PIERM 120 [2023] PIERM 119 [2023] PIERM 118 [2023] PIERM 117 [2023] PIERM 116 [2023] PIERM 115 [2023] PIERM 114 [2022] PIERM 113 [2022] PIERM 112 [2022] PIERM 111 [2022] PIERM 110 [2022] PIERM 109 [2022] PIERM 108 [2022] PIERM 107 [2022] PIERM 106 [2021] PIERM 105 [2021] PIERM 104 [2021] PIERM 103 [2021] PIERM 102 [2021] PIERM 101 [2021] PIERM 100 [2021] PIERM 99 [2021] PIERM 98 [2020] PIERM 97 [2020] PIERM 96 [2020] PIERM 95 [2020] PIERM 94 [2020] PIERM 93 [2020] PIERM 92 [2020] PIERM 91 [2020] PIERM 90 [2020] PIERM 89 [2020] PIERM 88 [2020] PIERM 87 [2019] PIERM 86 [2019] PIERM 85 [2019] PIERM 84 [2019] PIERM 83 [2019] PIERM 82 [2019] PIERM 81 [2019] PIERM 80 [2019] PIERM 79 [2019] PIERM 78 [2019] PIERM 77 [2019] PIERM 76 [2018] PIERM 75 [2018] PIERM 74 [2018] PIERM 73 [2018] PIERM 72 [2018] PIERM 71 [2018] PIERM 70 [2018] PIERM 69 [2018] PIERM 68 [2018] PIERM 67 [2018] PIERM 66 [2018] PIERM 65 [2018] PIERM 64 [2018] PIERM 63 [2018] PIERM 62 [2017] PIERM 61 [2017] PIERM 60 [2017] PIERM 59 [2017] PIERM 58 [2017] PIERM 57 [2017] PIERM 56 [2017] PIERM 55 [2017] PIERM 54 [2017] PIERM 53 [2017] PIERM 52 [2016] PIERM 51 [2016] PIERM 50 [2016] PIERM 49 [2016] PIERM 48 [2016] PIERM 47 [2016] PIERM 46 [2016] PIERM 45 [2016] PIERM 44 [2015] PIERM 43 [2015] PIERM 42 [2015] PIERM 41 [2015] PIERM 40 [2014] PIERM 39 [2014] PIERM 38 [2014] PIERM 37 [2014] PIERM 36 [2014] PIERM 35 [2014] PIERM 34 [2014] PIERM 33 [2013] PIERM 32 [2013] PIERM 31 [2013] PIERM 30 [2013] PIERM 29 [2013] PIERM 28 [2013] PIERM 27 [2012] PIERM 26 [2012] PIERM 25 [2012] PIERM 24 [2012] PIERM 23 [2012] PIERM 22 [2012] PIERM 21 [2011] PIERM 20 [2011] PIERM 19 [2011] PIERM 18 [2011] PIERM 17 [2011] PIERM 16 [2011] PIERM 14 [2010] PIERM 13 [2010] PIERM 12 [2010] PIERM 11 [2010] PIERM 10 [2009] PIERM 9 [2009] PIERM 8 [2009] PIERM 7 [2009] PIERM 6 [2009] PIERM 5 [2008] PIERM 4 [2008] PIERM 3 [2008] PIERM 2 [2008] PIERM 1 [2008]
2023-05-15
EMT Image Reconstruction Based on Composite Sensitivity Matrix and Its Application in Defect Detection of Carbon Fiber Wound Hydrogen Tank
By
Progress In Electromagnetics Research M, Vol. 116, 177-191, 2023
Abstract
Carbon fiber wound hydrogen tanks are widely used in the field of new energy, but their complex multilayer structure makes it difficult to conduct nondestructive testing/structural health monitoring (NDT/SHM). In this paper, electromagnetic tomography (EMT) is used for noncontact in situ defect detection on a carbon fiber wound hydrogen tank. According to its structural characteristics, an open U-shaped sensor array that fits the curvature of the tank body is designed. To improve the quality of reconstructed images, an iterative image reconstruction algorithm based on a composite sensitivity matrix (CSM) is proposed. To verify the performance of the method, the method in this paper is compared with linear back projection (LBP), the Landweber iterative algorithm and the Tikhonov regularization algorithm, and the image quality is evaluated by comparing the image relative error and correlation coefficient. Both simulated and experimental results show that the method proposed in this paper is more accurate in defect localization and higher in quality than traditional image reconstruction algorithms.
Citation
Ming Ma, Qiong Zhang, Ronghua Zhang, Shiyu Liu, Yi Wu, and Bailiang Chen, "EMT Image Reconstruction Based on Composite Sensitivity Matrix and Its Application in Defect Detection of Carbon Fiber Wound Hydrogen Tank," Progress In Electromagnetics Research M, Vol. 116, 177-191, 2023.
doi:10.2528/PIERM23022402
References

1. Durbin, D. J. and C. Malardier-Jugroot, "Review of hydrogen storage techniques for on board vehicle applications," International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, Vol. 38, 14595-14617, 2013.
doi:10.1016/j.ijhydene.2013.07.058

2. Hong, J.-H., M.-G. Han, and S.-H. Chang, "Safety evaluation of 70 MPa-capacity type III hydrogen pressure vessel considering material degradation of composites due to temperature rise," Composite Structures, Vol. 113, 127-133, 2014.
doi:10.1016/j.compstruct.2014.03.008

3. Liao, B. B., D. L. Wang, M. Hamdi, J. Y. Zheng, P. Jiang, C. H. Gu, and W. R. Hong, "Acoustic emission-based damage characterization of 70 MPa type IV hydrogen composite pressure vessels during hydraulic tests," International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, Vol. 44, 22494-22506, 2019.
doi:10.1016/j.ijhydene.2019.02.217

4. Zhang, F., P. Zhao, M. Niu, et al. "The survey of key technologies in hydrogen energy storage," International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, Vol. 41, 1-18, 2016.
doi:10.1016/j.ijhydene.2015.12.177

5. Ren, M.-F., X.-Zhang, C. Huang, et al. "An integrated macro/micro-scale approach for in situ evaluation of matrix cracking in the polymer matrix of cryogenic composite tanks," Composite Structures, Vol. 216, 201-212, 2019.
doi:10.1016/j.compstruct.2019.02.079

6. Meng, J., Y. Wang, H. Yang, et al. "Mechanical properties and internal microdefects evolution of carbon fiber reinforced polymer composites: Cryogenic temperature and thermocycling effects," Composites Science and Technology, Vol. 191, No. 1-2, 108083, 2020.
doi:10.1016/j.compscitech.2020.108083

7. Wang, D., B. Liao, C. Hao, A. Wen, J. Zheng, P. Jiang, C. Gu, P. Xu, and Q. Huang, "Acoustic emission characteristics of used 70 MPa type IV hydrogen storage tanks during hydrostatic burst tests," International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, Vol. 46, 12605-12614, 2021.
doi:10.1016/j.ijhydene.2020.12.177

8. Zhou, W., J. Wang, Z.-B. Pan, et al. "Review on optimization design, failure analysis and non-destructive testing of composite hydrogen storage vessel," International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, Vol. 47, 38862-38883, 2022.
doi:10.1016/j.ijhydene.2022.09.028

9. Murray, B. R., S. B. Leen, C. O. A. Semprimoschnig, and C. M. O. Bradaigh, "Helium permeability of polymer materials as liners for composite overwrapped pressure vessels," J. Appl. Polym. Sci., Vol. 133, No. 29, 43675, 2016.
doi:10.1002/app.43675

10. Yang, B., Y. Xiang, F.-Z. Xuan, C. Hu, B. Xiao, S. Zhou, and C. Luo, "Damage localization in hydrogen storage vessel by guided waves based on a real-time monitoring system," International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, Vol. 44, 22740-22751, 2019.
doi:10.1016/j.ijhydene.2019.01.009

11. Li, L. and F. Shao, "A threshold sensitivity method for image reconstruction of electromagnetic tomography," International Congress on Image and Signal Processing, Vol. 5, 2317-2321, 2010.
doi:10.1109/CISP.2010.5647870

12. Wang, J. and X. Wang, "Application of particle filtering algorithm in image reconstruction of EMT," Measurement Science and Technology, Vol. 26, 2015.

13. Altin Karataş, M. and H. Gökkaya, "A review on machinability of carbon fiber reinforced polymer (CFRP) and glass fiber reinforced polymer (GFRP) composite materials," Defence Technology, Vol. 14, 318-326, 2018.
doi:10.1016/j.dt.2018.02.001

14. Ye, J., M. Mao, H. Wang, and W. Yang, "Image reconstruction for ECT based on extended sensitivity matrix," IEEE Sensors Journal, Vol. 16, 2466-2476, 2016.
doi:10.1109/JSEN.2015.2513747

15. Zhang, S., Y. Xu, and F. Dong, "Difference sensitivity matrix constructed for ultrasound modulated electrical resistance tomography," Measurement Science and Technology, Vol. 29, 104005, 2018.
doi:10.1088/1361-6501/aad733

16. Zhang, L. and W. Yin, "Image reconstruction method along electrical field centre lines using a modified mixed normalization model for electrical capacitance tomography," Flow Measurement and Instrumentation, Vol. 62, 37-43, 2018.
doi:10.1016/j.flowmeasinst.2018.05.011

17. Tang, K., H. Hu, L. Li, and X. Wang, "Composite sensitivity matrix for reducing the influence of medium electrification on electrical capacitance tomography," IEEE Transactions on Instrumentation and Measurement, Vol. 69, 1159-1169, 2020.
doi:10.1109/TIM.2019.2910343

18. Gonzalez-Nakazawa, A., W. Yang, and K. Hennessey, "An analytical approach for modelling electro-magnetic tomography sensor," Sensor Review, Vol. 28, 212-221, 2008.
doi:10.1108/02602280810882562

19. Liu, X., Z. Liu, and Y. Yue, "Simulation research of impact of number of coils in EMT sensors on reconstructed images quality," Sensing & Imaging An International Journal, Vol. 20, 1-13, 2019.

20. Liu, Z., W. Li, F. Xue, J. Xiafang, B. Bu, and Z. Yi, "Electromagnetic tomography rail defect inspection," IEEE Transactions on Magnetics, Vol. 51, 1-7, 2015.

21. Rodriguez, S., Y. Wang, R. Akid, R. Leiva, and W. Yin, "Design of an FPGA-based eddy current instrument for the detection of corrosion pits," IEEE International Instrumentation and Measurement Technology Conference, 705-710, 2015.

22. Yin, W. and A. J. Peyton, "Sensitivity formulation including velocity effects for electromagnetic induction systems," IEEE Transactions on Magnetics, Vol. 46, 1172-1176, 2010.
doi:10.1109/TMAG.2009.2038275

23. Wang, Q., H. Zhang, X. Li, X. Duan, J. Wang, R. Zhang, H. Zhang, Y. Ma, H. Wang, and J. Jia, "Error-constraint deep learning scheme for Electrical Impedance Tomography (EIT)," IEEE Transactions on Instrumentation and Measurement, Vol. 71, 1-11, 2022.

24. Yang, W. Q., D. M. Spink, T. A. York, and H. McCann, "An image-reconstruction algorithm based on Landweber's iteration method for electrical-capacitance tomography," Measurement Science and Technology, Vol. 10, 1065-1069, 1999.
doi:10.1088/0957-0233/10/11/315

25. Liu, Z., G. Yang, N. He, and X. Tan, "Landweber iterative algorithm based on regularization in electromagnetic tomography for multiphase flow measurement," Flow Measurement and Instrumentation, Vol. 27, 53-58, 2012.
doi:10.1016/j.flowmeasinst.2012.04.011

26. Wang, T., D. Wu, W. Chen, and J. Yang, "Detection of delamination defects inside carbon fiber reinforced plastic laminates by measuring eddy-current loss," Composite Structures, Vol. 268, 114012, 2021.
doi:10.1016/j.compstruct.2021.114012