Vol. 90
Latest Volume
All Volumes
PIERM 130 [2024] PIERM 129 [2024] PIERM 128 [2024] PIERM 127 [2024] PIERM 126 [2024] PIERM 125 [2024] PIERM 124 [2024] PIERM 123 [2024] PIERM 122 [2023] PIERM 121 [2023] PIERM 120 [2023] PIERM 119 [2023] PIERM 118 [2023] PIERM 117 [2023] PIERM 116 [2023] PIERM 115 [2023] PIERM 114 [2022] PIERM 113 [2022] PIERM 112 [2022] PIERM 111 [2022] PIERM 110 [2022] PIERM 109 [2022] PIERM 108 [2022] PIERM 107 [2022] PIERM 106 [2021] PIERM 105 [2021] PIERM 104 [2021] PIERM 103 [2021] PIERM 102 [2021] PIERM 101 [2021] PIERM 100 [2021] PIERM 99 [2021] PIERM 98 [2020] PIERM 97 [2020] PIERM 96 [2020] PIERM 95 [2020] PIERM 94 [2020] PIERM 93 [2020] PIERM 92 [2020] PIERM 91 [2020] PIERM 90 [2020] PIERM 89 [2020] PIERM 88 [2020] PIERM 87 [2019] PIERM 86 [2019] PIERM 85 [2019] PIERM 84 [2019] PIERM 83 [2019] PIERM 82 [2019] PIERM 81 [2019] PIERM 80 [2019] PIERM 79 [2019] PIERM 78 [2019] PIERM 77 [2019] PIERM 76 [2018] PIERM 75 [2018] PIERM 74 [2018] PIERM 73 [2018] PIERM 72 [2018] PIERM 71 [2018] PIERM 70 [2018] PIERM 69 [2018] PIERM 68 [2018] PIERM 67 [2018] PIERM 66 [2018] PIERM 65 [2018] PIERM 64 [2018] PIERM 63 [2018] PIERM 62 [2017] PIERM 61 [2017] PIERM 60 [2017] PIERM 59 [2017] PIERM 58 [2017] PIERM 57 [2017] PIERM 56 [2017] PIERM 55 [2017] PIERM 54 [2017] PIERM 53 [2017] PIERM 52 [2016] PIERM 51 [2016] PIERM 50 [2016] PIERM 49 [2016] PIERM 48 [2016] PIERM 47 [2016] PIERM 46 [2016] PIERM 45 [2016] PIERM 44 [2015] PIERM 43 [2015] PIERM 42 [2015] PIERM 41 [2015] PIERM 40 [2014] PIERM 39 [2014] PIERM 38 [2014] PIERM 37 [2014] PIERM 36 [2014] PIERM 35 [2014] PIERM 34 [2014] PIERM 33 [2013] PIERM 32 [2013] PIERM 31 [2013] PIERM 30 [2013] PIERM 29 [2013] PIERM 28 [2013] PIERM 27 [2012] PIERM 26 [2012] PIERM 25 [2012] PIERM 24 [2012] PIERM 23 [2012] PIERM 22 [2012] PIERM 21 [2011] PIERM 20 [2011] PIERM 19 [2011] PIERM 18 [2011] PIERM 17 [2011] PIERM 16 [2011] PIERM 14 [2010] PIERM 13 [2010] PIERM 12 [2010] PIERM 11 [2010] PIERM 10 [2009] PIERM 9 [2009] PIERM 8 [2009] PIERM 7 [2009] PIERM 6 [2009] PIERM 5 [2008] PIERM 4 [2008] PIERM 3 [2008] PIERM 2 [2008] PIERM 1 [2008]
2020-03-06
Influence of Steel Mesh on Magnetic Proximity Detection Systems: an Experimental Study
By
Progress In Electromagnetics Research M, Vol. 90, 89-97, 2020
Abstract
Proximity Detection Systems (PDSs) are used in the mining industry for protecting mine workers from striking, pinning, and crushing injuries when they work in close proximity to heavy machines such as continuous mining machines (CMMs). Currently all PDSs approved by the Mine Safety and Health Administration (MSHA) are magnetic field based systems which can be influenced by the presence of steel wire mesh that is commonly used for supporting roof and ribs in underground coal mines. In this paper, researchers at the National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health (NIOSH) characterized the influence of the mesh on the performance of magnetic PDSs by measuring the magnetic field difference around a CMM caused by the presence of the mesh. The results show that the magnetic fields are generally enhanced by the mesh which causes PDS detection zones to be increased correspondingly. It was discovered that the fields around the joints of two mesh sections have the greatest enhancement and thus deserve more attention. In addition, it was found that the presence of mesh can also cause a variation in the generator current. The experimental results show that the generator current variation and thus the magnetic field change caused by the mesh can be significant (on the order of ten) when the mesh is extremely close to the generator (e.g, less than 1 cm) and is negligible when mesh is relatively far (greater than 0.15 m). The findings in this paper can be used to develop guidelines and best practices to mitigate the influence of mesh on PDSs.
Citation
Chenming Zhou, Bruce G. Whisner, Jacob L. Carr, and Justin Srednicki, "Influence of Steel Mesh on Magnetic Proximity Detection Systems: an Experimental Study," Progress In Electromagnetics Research M, Vol. 90, 89-97, 2020.
doi:10.2528/PIERM19082004
References

1. Proximity Detection Systems for Continuous Mining Machines in Underground Coal Mines, MSHA, 2015.

2. Qing, X. and Z. N. Chen, "Proximity effects of metallic environments on high frequency RFID reader antenna: Study and applications," IEEE Transactions on Antennas and Propagation, Vol. 55, No. 11, 3105-3111, 2007.
doi:10.1109/TAP.2007.908575

3. Dobkin, D. M. and S. M. Weigand, "Environmental effects on RFID tag antennas,", 135-138, 2005.

4. D'hoe, K. and V. Nieuwenhuyse, "Influence of different types of metal plates on a high frequency RFID loop antenna: Study and design," Advances in Electrical and Computer Engineering, Vol. 9, No. 2, 3-8, 2009.
doi:10.4316/aece.2009.02001

5. Otteni, G., "Plane wave reflection from a rectangular-mesh ground screen," IEEE Transactions on Antennas and Propagation, Vol. 21, No. 6, 843-851, 1973.
doi:10.1109/TAP.1973.1140609

6. Hill, D. A. and J. R. Wait, "Electromagnetic surface wave propagation over a bonded wire mesh," IEEE Transactions on Electromagnetic Compatibility, No. 1, 2-7, 1977.
doi:10.1109/TEMC.1977.303515

7. Yamaguchi, Y., T. Honda, and M. Sengoku, "Reduction of wave propagation loss by mesh in rectangular tunnels," IEEE Transactions on Electromagnetic Compatibility, Vol. 37, No. 1, 88-93, 1995.
doi:10.1109/15.350245

8. Yamaguchi, Y., T. Honda, M. Sengoku, S. Motooka, and T. Abe, "On the reduction of wave propagation loss in tunnels," IEEE Transactions on Electromagnetic Compatibility, Vol. 34, No. 2, 78-85, 1992.
doi:10.1109/15.135619

9. Carr, J. L. and J. P. DuCarme, "Performance of an intelligent proximity detection system for continuous mining machines," SME Annual Meeting, 1-6, Denver, CO, 2013.

10. Carr, J. L., C. C. Jobes, and J. Li, "Development of a method to determine operator location using electromagnetic proximity detection," 2010 IEEE International Workshop on Robotic and Sensors Environments (ROSE), 51-56, Phoenix, AZ, 2010.

11. Noll, J., J. Ducarme, J. Li, R. J. Matetic, M. Reyes, J. Srednicki, and C. Zhou, "Electromagnetic interference with proximity detection systems,", 2018.

12. Li, J., J. Carr, J. Waynert, and P. Kovalchik, "Environmental impact on the magnetic field distribution of a magnetic proximity detection system in an underground coal mine," Journal of Electromagnetic Waves and Applications, Vol. 27, No. 18, 2416-2429, 2013.
doi:10.1080/09205071.2013.852487