Vol. 79
Latest Volume
All Volumes
PIERM 130 [2024] PIERM 129 [2024] PIERM 128 [2024] PIERM 127 [2024] PIERM 126 [2024] PIERM 125 [2024] PIERM 124 [2024] PIERM 123 [2024] PIERM 122 [2023] PIERM 121 [2023] PIERM 120 [2023] PIERM 119 [2023] PIERM 118 [2023] PIERM 117 [2023] PIERM 116 [2023] PIERM 115 [2023] PIERM 114 [2022] PIERM 113 [2022] PIERM 112 [2022] PIERM 111 [2022] PIERM 110 [2022] PIERM 109 [2022] PIERM 108 [2022] PIERM 107 [2022] PIERM 106 [2021] PIERM 105 [2021] PIERM 104 [2021] PIERM 103 [2021] PIERM 102 [2021] PIERM 101 [2021] PIERM 100 [2021] PIERM 99 [2021] PIERM 98 [2020] PIERM 97 [2020] PIERM 96 [2020] PIERM 95 [2020] PIERM 94 [2020] PIERM 93 [2020] PIERM 92 [2020] PIERM 91 [2020] PIERM 90 [2020] PIERM 89 [2020] PIERM 88 [2020] PIERM 87 [2019] PIERM 86 [2019] PIERM 85 [2019] PIERM 84 [2019] PIERM 83 [2019] PIERM 82 [2019] PIERM 81 [2019] PIERM 80 [2019] PIERM 79 [2019] PIERM 78 [2019] PIERM 77 [2019] PIERM 76 [2018] PIERM 75 [2018] PIERM 74 [2018] PIERM 73 [2018] PIERM 72 [2018] PIERM 71 [2018] PIERM 70 [2018] PIERM 69 [2018] PIERM 68 [2018] PIERM 67 [2018] PIERM 66 [2018] PIERM 65 [2018] PIERM 64 [2018] PIERM 63 [2018] PIERM 62 [2017] PIERM 61 [2017] PIERM 60 [2017] PIERM 59 [2017] PIERM 58 [2017] PIERM 57 [2017] PIERM 56 [2017] PIERM 55 [2017] PIERM 54 [2017] PIERM 53 [2017] PIERM 52 [2016] PIERM 51 [2016] PIERM 50 [2016] PIERM 49 [2016] PIERM 48 [2016] PIERM 47 [2016] PIERM 46 [2016] PIERM 45 [2016] PIERM 44 [2015] PIERM 43 [2015] PIERM 42 [2015] PIERM 41 [2015] PIERM 40 [2014] PIERM 39 [2014] PIERM 38 [2014] PIERM 37 [2014] PIERM 36 [2014] PIERM 35 [2014] PIERM 34 [2014] PIERM 33 [2013] PIERM 32 [2013] PIERM 31 [2013] PIERM 30 [2013] PIERM 29 [2013] PIERM 28 [2013] PIERM 27 [2012] PIERM 26 [2012] PIERM 25 [2012] PIERM 24 [2012] PIERM 23 [2012] PIERM 22 [2012] PIERM 21 [2011] PIERM 20 [2011] PIERM 19 [2011] PIERM 18 [2011] PIERM 17 [2011] PIERM 16 [2011] PIERM 14 [2010] PIERM 13 [2010] PIERM 12 [2010] PIERM 11 [2010] PIERM 10 [2009] PIERM 9 [2009] PIERM 8 [2009] PIERM 7 [2009] PIERM 6 [2009] PIERM 5 [2008] PIERM 4 [2008] PIERM 3 [2008] PIERM 2 [2008] PIERM 1 [2008]
2019-02-15
Target Classification with Low-Resolution Radars Based on Multifractal Features in Fractional Fourier Domain
By
Progress In Electromagnetics Research M, Vol. 79, 51-60, 2019
Abstract
Due to the limitations of low-resolution radar system and background clutter, the task of target classification with conventional low-resolution radars is relatively difficult. This paper introduces fractional Fourier transform (FrFT) to process aircraft echoes in order to find the optimal fractional Fourier domain, in which signal to noise ratio can reach the maximum, and then applies multifractal theory to the feature extraction of radar targets. Based on the above, we use SVM to do target classification. Experiments show that the multifractal characteristics of aircraft echoes can be enhanced by FrFT, and the features extracted from the optimal fractional Fourier domain can be used effectively to classify different types of aircraft even in the case of low SNR.
Citation
Huaxia Zhang, Qiusheng Li, Chuicai Rong, and Xindi Yuan, "Target Classification with Low-Resolution Radars Based on Multifractal Features in Fractional Fourier Domain," Progress In Electromagnetics Research M, Vol. 79, 51-60, 2019.
doi:10.2528/PIERM18110503
References

1. Li, Q. S., W. X. Xie, and J. X. Huang, "Extended fractal characteristic analysis and target classification study of surveillance radar echoes," Journal of Signal Processing, Vol. 29, No. 9, 1091-1097, 2013.

2. Yong, Y. W., P. J. Hoon, B. J. Wu, et al. "Automatic feature extraction from jet engine modulation signals based on an image processing method," IET Radar, Sonar & Navigation, Vol. 9, No. 7, 783-789, 2015.
doi:10.1049/iet-rsn.2014.0281

3. Yang, S. F., H. K. Wu, X. Wang, et al. "Target feature extraction and recognition based on low-resolution radar," Electronic Information Countermeasures Technology, Vol. 30, No. 4, 15-20, 2015.

4. Zhang, G. W., R. Li, and D. Wang, "An overview of low resolution radar target classification methods," Digital Communication World, Vol. 5, 280, 2018.

5. Huang, P. K., H. C. Yin, and X. J. Xu, Radar Target Characteristics, 114-115, Beijing Electronic Industry Press, 2005.

6. Yun, S., H. L. Wang, H. J. Zhang, et al. "Target recognition of low resolution radar based on waveform feature," Shipboard Electronic Countermeasure, Vol. 38, No. 4, 62-69, 2015.

7. Chen, H., Y. Ding, X. H. Jiao, et al. "Target recognition for low resolution radar based on generalized fuzzy function," Shipboard Electronic Countermeasure, Vol. 39, No. 5, 46-49, 2016.

8. Song, X. J., "Research on target classification and identification of low-resolution radar," Radar Science and Technology, Vol. 14, No. 3, 286-290, 2016.

9. Li, Q., H. Zhang, Q. Lu, and L. Wei, "Research on analysis of aircraft echo characteristics and classification of targets in low-resolution radars based on EEMD," Progress In Electromagnetics Research M, Vol. 68, 61-68, 2018.

10. Du, L., H. R. Shi, L. S. Li, et al. "Feature extraction method for target echo of narrowband radar aircraft based on fractional Fourier transform," Journal of Electronics and Information, Vol. 38, No. 12, 3093-3099, 2016.

11. Yu, G., S. C. Piao, and X. Han, "Fractional Fourier transform-based detection and delay time estimation of moving target in strong reverberation environment," IET Radar, Sonar & Navigation, Vol. 11, No. 9, 1367-1372, 2017.
doi:10.1049/iet-rsn.2016.0601

12. Elgamel, S. A. and J. Soraghan, "A new fractional Fourier transform based monopulse tracking radar processor," 2010 IEEE International Conference on Acoustics, Speech, and Signal Processing, ICASSP 2010 - Proceedings, Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers Inc., 2010.

13. Xian, M., Z. W. Zhuang, S. P. Xiao, et al. "Chaotic multifractal analysis and identification of radar target echoes," Journal of National University of Defense Technology, Vol. 2, 63-67, 1998.

14. Shi, Z. G., J. X. Zhou, H. Z. Zhao, et al. "Multifractal analysis of sea clutter," Data Acquisition and Processing, Vol. 2, 168-173, 2006.

15. Li, Q. S., X. Y. Liu, and J. P. Chen, "Research on fractal modeling of aircraft echoes and classification of targets in conventional radars," Journal of Gannan Normal University, Vol. 36, No. 3, 34-39, 2015.

16. Li, Q. S., X. D. Yuan, and L. X. Guan, "Analysis of the multifractal characteristics of the conventional radar return signal from aircraft targets," Journal of Anhui University (Natural Science Edition), Vol. 36, No. 5, 47-54, 2012.

17. Li, Q. S. and W. X. Xie, "Target classification with low-resolution surveillance radars based on multifractal features," Computer Application Research, Vol. 30, No. 2, 405-409, 2013.

18. Li, Q. S., X. C. Xie, H. Zhu, et al. "Fractal characteristic analysis and target classification of aircraft echoes of low-resolution radars in fractional Fourier domain," Application Research of Computers, Vol. 35, No. 9, 2869-2872, 2018.

19. Ozaktas, H. M., O. Arikan, M. A. Kutay, et al. "Digital computation of the fractional Fourier transform," IEEE Transactions on Signal Processing, Vol. 44, No. 9, 2141-2150, 1996.
doi:10.1109/78.536672

20. Williams, W. J., "Uncertainty, information, and time-frequency distributions," Proceedings of SPIE, The International Society for Optical Engineering, Vol. 1566, 144-156, 1991.

21. Hao, B. and M. Luo, "Performance analysis and interference suppression method of GPS system under time-varying single-tone interference," Computer Application Research, Vol. 35, No. 321(7), 185-188, 2018.

22. Ouyang, X. and M. G. Amin, "Short-time Fourier transform receiver for nonstationary interference excision in direct sequence spread spectrum communications," IEEE Transactions on Signal Processing, Vol. 49, No. 4, 851-863, 2001.
doi:10.1109/78.912929