Vol. 78
Latest Volume
All Volumes
PIERM 130 [2024] PIERM 129 [2024] PIERM 128 [2024] PIERM 127 [2024] PIERM 126 [2024] PIERM 125 [2024] PIERM 124 [2024] PIERM 123 [2024] PIERM 122 [2023] PIERM 121 [2023] PIERM 120 [2023] PIERM 119 [2023] PIERM 118 [2023] PIERM 117 [2023] PIERM 116 [2023] PIERM 115 [2023] PIERM 114 [2022] PIERM 113 [2022] PIERM 112 [2022] PIERM 111 [2022] PIERM 110 [2022] PIERM 109 [2022] PIERM 108 [2022] PIERM 107 [2022] PIERM 106 [2021] PIERM 105 [2021] PIERM 104 [2021] PIERM 103 [2021] PIERM 102 [2021] PIERM 101 [2021] PIERM 100 [2021] PIERM 99 [2021] PIERM 98 [2020] PIERM 97 [2020] PIERM 96 [2020] PIERM 95 [2020] PIERM 94 [2020] PIERM 93 [2020] PIERM 92 [2020] PIERM 91 [2020] PIERM 90 [2020] PIERM 89 [2020] PIERM 88 [2020] PIERM 87 [2019] PIERM 86 [2019] PIERM 85 [2019] PIERM 84 [2019] PIERM 83 [2019] PIERM 82 [2019] PIERM 81 [2019] PIERM 80 [2019] PIERM 79 [2019] PIERM 78 [2019] PIERM 77 [2019] PIERM 76 [2018] PIERM 75 [2018] PIERM 74 [2018] PIERM 73 [2018] PIERM 72 [2018] PIERM 71 [2018] PIERM 70 [2018] PIERM 69 [2018] PIERM 68 [2018] PIERM 67 [2018] PIERM 66 [2018] PIERM 65 [2018] PIERM 64 [2018] PIERM 63 [2018] PIERM 62 [2017] PIERM 61 [2017] PIERM 60 [2017] PIERM 59 [2017] PIERM 58 [2017] PIERM 57 [2017] PIERM 56 [2017] PIERM 55 [2017] PIERM 54 [2017] PIERM 53 [2017] PIERM 52 [2016] PIERM 51 [2016] PIERM 50 [2016] PIERM 49 [2016] PIERM 48 [2016] PIERM 47 [2016] PIERM 46 [2016] PIERM 45 [2016] PIERM 44 [2015] PIERM 43 [2015] PIERM 42 [2015] PIERM 41 [2015] PIERM 40 [2014] PIERM 39 [2014] PIERM 38 [2014] PIERM 37 [2014] PIERM 36 [2014] PIERM 35 [2014] PIERM 34 [2014] PIERM 33 [2013] PIERM 32 [2013] PIERM 31 [2013] PIERM 30 [2013] PIERM 29 [2013] PIERM 28 [2013] PIERM 27 [2012] PIERM 26 [2012] PIERM 25 [2012] PIERM 24 [2012] PIERM 23 [2012] PIERM 22 [2012] PIERM 21 [2011] PIERM 20 [2011] PIERM 19 [2011] PIERM 18 [2011] PIERM 17 [2011] PIERM 16 [2011] PIERM 14 [2010] PIERM 13 [2010] PIERM 12 [2010] PIERM 11 [2010] PIERM 10 [2009] PIERM 9 [2009] PIERM 8 [2009] PIERM 7 [2009] PIERM 6 [2009] PIERM 5 [2008] PIERM 4 [2008] PIERM 3 [2008] PIERM 2 [2008] PIERM 1 [2008]
2019-01-16
Improving Efficiency of the Secondary Sources Method for Modeling of the Three-Dimensional Electromagnetic Field of Eddy Currents
By
Progress In Electromagnetics Research M, Vol. 78, 19-27, 2019
Abstract
A mathematical model is constructed for calculating a three-dimensional quasistationary electromagnetic field in a piecewise-homogeneous medium containing massive conductors which is excited by a variable magnetic field. The field is varying in time according to an arbitrary law. It is proposed to use the integral relation instead of the boundary condition written at a point, which allows one to get away from the problem of collocation points and at the same time increase the computational efficiency of the numerical model. The magnetic field is calculated for the case of the excitation of eddy currents in a conducting sample containing a cut of finite size. The results obtained are confirmed by natural experiments.
Citation
Dmitriy M. Filippov, and Alexandr A. Shuyskyy, "Improving Efficiency of the Secondary Sources Method for Modeling of the Three-Dimensional Electromagnetic Field of Eddy Currents," Progress In Electromagnetics Research M, Vol. 78, 19-27, 2019.
doi:10.2528/PIERM18102707
References

1. Irazu, L. and M. J. Elejabarrieta, "Analysis and numerical modelling of eddy current damper for vibration problems," Journal of Sound and Vibration, Vol. 426, 75-89, July 2018.
doi:10.1016/j.jsv.2018.03.033

2. Kuczmann, M., "Numerical analysis of eddy current field in laminated media," Pollack Periodica, Vol. 13, No. 2, 3-14, 2018.
doi:10.1556/606.2018.13.2.1

3. Maraspin, F., P. Bevilacqua, and P. Rem, "Modelling the throw of metals and nonmetals in eddy current separations," International Journal of Mineral Processing, Vol. 73, No. 1, 1-11, 2004.
doi:10.1016/S0301-7516(03)00081-4

4. Aubert, G., J.-F. Jacquinot, and D. Sakellariou, "Eddy current effects in plain and hollow cylinders spinning inside homogeneous magnetic fields: Application to magnetic resonance," Journal of Chemical Physics, Vol. 137, No. 15, 1-14, 2012.
doi:10.1063/1.4756948

5. Yatchev, I., "Numerical eddy current modelling," Proc. XLVII ETRAN Conference, Vol. 2, 235-241, Herceg Novi, June 8–13, 2003.

6. Heller, C. J., Handbook of Nondestructive Evaluation, McGraw-Hill, 2001.

7. Mohanty, I., R. Nagendran, A. V. T. Arasu, R. Baskaran, and A. Mani, "Correlation of defect depth with diffusion time of eddy currents for the defects in conducting materials by using transient eddy current NDE," Measurement Science and Technology, Vol. 29, No. 10, 215 pages, 2018, https://doi.org/10.1088/1361-6501/aad613.

8. Zhilichev, Y., "Solutions of eddy-current problems in a finite length cylinder by separation of variables," Progress In Electromagnetics Research B, Vol. 81, 81-100, 2018.
doi:10.2528/PIERB18042704

9. Nagel, J. R., "Induced eddy currents in simple conductive geometries," IEEE Antennas and Propagation Magazine, Vol. 60, No. 1, 81-88, 2018.
doi:10.1109/MAP.2017.2774206

10. Nagel, J. R., "Fast finite-difference calculation of eddy currents in thin metal sheets," Applied Computational Electromagnetics Society Journal, Vol. 33, No. 6, 575-584, 2018.

11. Pipis, K., A. Skarlatos, T. Theodoulidis, and D. Lesselier, "ECT-signal calculation of cracks near fastener holes using an integral equation formalism with dedicated Green’s kernel," IEEE Transactions on Magnetics, Vol. 52, No. 4, 1-8, April 2016.
doi:10.1109/TMAG.2015.2496189

12. Bowler, J. R., "Eddy-current interaction with an ideal crack. I. The forward problem," Journal of Applied Physics, Vol. 75, No. 12, 8128-8137, 1994.
doi:10.1063/1.356511

13. Bettini, P. and R. Specogna, "A boundary integral method for computing eddy currents in thin conductors of arbitrary topology," IEEE Transactions on Magnetics, Vol. 51, No. 3, 1-4, March 2015.

14. Bettini, P., M. F. Palumbo, and R. Specogna, "A boundary element method for eddy-current problems in fusion devices," Fusion Engineering and Design, Vol. 96-97, 620-623, 2015.
doi:10.1016/j.fusengdes.2015.05.035

15. Mayergoyz, I. D., "Boundary integral equations of minimum order for the calculation of three-dimensional eddy current problems," IEEE Transactions on Magnetics, Vol. 18, No. 2, 536-539, March 1982.
doi:10.1109/TMAG.1982.1061855

16. Filippov, D. M., G. P. Kozik, A. V. Fursenko, and V. N. Fedorovsky, "The secondary sources method analysis and experimental modeling of the permanent magnet eddy currents suspansion," Proc. of 2nd International Conference on Industrial Engineering, Applications and Manufacturing (ICIEAM), 1-4, 2016.

17. Halfla, W., A. Buchau, F. Groh, and W. M. Rucker, "Efficient integral equation method for the solution of 3-D magnetostatic problems," IEEE Transactions on Magnetics, Vol. 41, No. 5, 1408-1411, May 2005.
doi:10.1109/TMAG.2005.844342

18. Adelman, R., N. A. Gumerov, and R. Duraiswami, "Computation of galerkin double surface integrals in the 3-D boundary element method," IEEE Transactions on Antennas and Propagation, Vol. 64, No. 6, 2389-2400, June 2016.
doi:10.1109/TAP.2016.2546951

19. Stenroos, M. and J. Haueisen, "Boundary element computations in the forward and inverse problems of electrocardiography comparison of collocation and Galerkin Weightings," IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering, Vol. 55, No. 9, 2124-2133, September 2008.
doi:10.1109/TBME.2008.923913

20. Hantila, F. I., "Modelling eddy currents in the shields," COMPEL: The International Journal for Computation and Mathematics in Electrical and Electronic Engineering, Vol. 28, No. 4, 2009.
doi:10.1108/03321640910959035

21. Shen, J., Z. Andjelic, and B. Schaub, "A hybrid single and dial simple layer bondary integral equation formulation for 3-D eddy currents," IEEE Transactions on Magnetics, Vol. 34, No. 5, 2636-2639, September 1998.
doi:10.1109/20.717610

22. Ishibashi, K., Z. Andjelic, and D. Pusch, "Nonlinear eddy current analysis by BEM utilizing adaptive equation technique," IEEE Transactions on Magnetics, Vol. 45, No. 3, 1020-1023, March 2000.
doi:10.1109/TMAG.2009.2012548

23. Berzhansky, V. N., D. M. Filippov, and N. V. Lugovskoy, "Magneto-optical visualization of eddy current magnetic fields," Physics Procedia, Vol. 82, 27-31, 2016.
doi:10.1016/j.phpro.2016.05.006