Vol. 63
Latest Volume
All Volumes
PIERM 130 [2024] PIERM 129 [2024] PIERM 128 [2024] PIERM 127 [2024] PIERM 126 [2024] PIERM 125 [2024] PIERM 124 [2024] PIERM 123 [2024] PIERM 122 [2023] PIERM 121 [2023] PIERM 120 [2023] PIERM 119 [2023] PIERM 118 [2023] PIERM 117 [2023] PIERM 116 [2023] PIERM 115 [2023] PIERM 114 [2022] PIERM 113 [2022] PIERM 112 [2022] PIERM 111 [2022] PIERM 110 [2022] PIERM 109 [2022] PIERM 108 [2022] PIERM 107 [2022] PIERM 106 [2021] PIERM 105 [2021] PIERM 104 [2021] PIERM 103 [2021] PIERM 102 [2021] PIERM 101 [2021] PIERM 100 [2021] PIERM 99 [2021] PIERM 98 [2020] PIERM 97 [2020] PIERM 96 [2020] PIERM 95 [2020] PIERM 94 [2020] PIERM 93 [2020] PIERM 92 [2020] PIERM 91 [2020] PIERM 90 [2020] PIERM 89 [2020] PIERM 88 [2020] PIERM 87 [2019] PIERM 86 [2019] PIERM 85 [2019] PIERM 84 [2019] PIERM 83 [2019] PIERM 82 [2019] PIERM 81 [2019] PIERM 80 [2019] PIERM 79 [2019] PIERM 78 [2019] PIERM 77 [2019] PIERM 76 [2018] PIERM 75 [2018] PIERM 74 [2018] PIERM 73 [2018] PIERM 72 [2018] PIERM 71 [2018] PIERM 70 [2018] PIERM 69 [2018] PIERM 68 [2018] PIERM 67 [2018] PIERM 66 [2018] PIERM 65 [2018] PIERM 64 [2018] PIERM 63 [2018] PIERM 62 [2017] PIERM 61 [2017] PIERM 60 [2017] PIERM 59 [2017] PIERM 58 [2017] PIERM 57 [2017] PIERM 56 [2017] PIERM 55 [2017] PIERM 54 [2017] PIERM 53 [2017] PIERM 52 [2016] PIERM 51 [2016] PIERM 50 [2016] PIERM 49 [2016] PIERM 48 [2016] PIERM 47 [2016] PIERM 46 [2016] PIERM 45 [2016] PIERM 44 [2015] PIERM 43 [2015] PIERM 42 [2015] PIERM 41 [2015] PIERM 40 [2014] PIERM 39 [2014] PIERM 38 [2014] PIERM 37 [2014] PIERM 36 [2014] PIERM 35 [2014] PIERM 34 [2014] PIERM 33 [2013] PIERM 32 [2013] PIERM 31 [2013] PIERM 30 [2013] PIERM 29 [2013] PIERM 28 [2013] PIERM 27 [2012] PIERM 26 [2012] PIERM 25 [2012] PIERM 24 [2012] PIERM 23 [2012] PIERM 22 [2012] PIERM 21 [2011] PIERM 20 [2011] PIERM 19 [2011] PIERM 18 [2011] PIERM 17 [2011] PIERM 16 [2011] PIERM 14 [2010] PIERM 13 [2010] PIERM 12 [2010] PIERM 11 [2010] PIERM 10 [2009] PIERM 9 [2009] PIERM 8 [2009] PIERM 7 [2009] PIERM 6 [2009] PIERM 5 [2008] PIERM 4 [2008] PIERM 3 [2008] PIERM 2 [2008] PIERM 1 [2008]
2017-12-07
Two Element Band-Notched UWB MIMO Antenna with High and Uniform Isolation
By
Progress In Electromagnetics Research M, Vol. 63, 119-129, 2018
Abstract
In this paper, a single band-notched at 5.2 GHz with complementary split ring resonator (CSRR) ultra-wideband (UWB) antenna and its implementation in designing of two element multiple-input multiple-output (MIMO) with high and uniform isolation are experimentally demonstrated. The proposed UWB MIMO consists of T-shaped stub in ground plane in between antenna elements of the size of λat 3.1 GHz/4 to achieve minimum 20 dB isolation, which is almost uniform in entire UWB band. The size of the UWB MIMO antenna is 0.31λat 3.1 GHz×0.434λat 3.1 GHz×0.008λat 3.1 GHz mm3 and it is printed on RT/duroid 5880 substrate (ɛr = 2.2, tanδ = 0.0009), which leads to good gain and high total efficiency of the antenna in operating bands. The simulated and measured result shows good agreement for the impedance bandwidth (|S11| < -10 dB) and isolation (|S21| < -20 dB) most of the operating band, excluding the notched band at 5.2 GHz in UWB range. The simulated, measured and calculated MIMO antenna diversity parameters proves that the antenna is suitable for UWB MIMO systems.
Citation
Dinesh Yadav, Mahesh Pandurang Abegaonkar, Shiban K. Koul, Vivekanand N. Tiwari, and Deepak Bhatnagar, "Two Element Band-Notched UWB MIMO Antenna with High and Uniform Isolation," Progress In Electromagnetics Research M, Vol. 63, 119-129, 2018.
doi:10.2528/PIERM17091106
References

1. Foschini, G. J. and M. J. Gans, "On limits of wireless communications in a fading environment when using multiple antennas," Wireless Pers. Commun., Vol. 6, 311-335, Mar. 1998.
doi:10.1023/A:1008889222784

2. US Federal Communications Commission, et al. "FCC revision of part 15 of the commission’s rules regarding ultra-wideband transmission systems: First report and order," Technical Report, Feb. 2002.

3. Liu, L., S. W. Cheung, and T. I. Yuk, "Compact MIMO antenna for portable devices in UWB applications," IEEE Trans. Antennas Propag., Vol. 61, No. 8, 4257-4264, Aug. 2013.
doi:10.1109/TAP.2013.2263277

4. Ren, J., W. Hu, Y. Yin, and R. Fan, "Compact printed MIMO antenna for UWB applications," IEEE Antennas Wireless Propag. Lett., Vol. 13, 1517-1520, Jul. 2014.

5. Lee, J. M., K. B. Kim, H. K. Ryu, and J. M. Woo, "A compact ultrawide-band MIMO antenna with WLAN band-rejected operation for mobile devices," IEEE Antennas Wireless Propag. Lett., Vol. 11, 990-993, Aug. 2012.

6. Koohestani, M., A. A. Moreira, and A. K. Skrivervik, "A novel compact CPW-fed polarization diversity ultrawideband antenna," IEEE Antennas Wireless Propag. Lett., Vol. 13, 563-566, Mar. 2014.
doi:10.1109/LAWP.2014.2312730

7. Li, H., J. Liu, Z. Wang, and Y. Z. Yin, "Compact 1 × 2 and 2 × 2 MIMO antennas with enhanced isolation for ultrawideband application," Progress In Electromagnetics Research C, Vol. 71, 41-49, Jan. 2017.
doi:10.2528/PIERC16120805

8. Sipal, D., M. P. Abegaonkar, and S. K. Koul, "Compact band-notched UWB antenna for MIMO applications in portable wireless devices," Microw. Opt. Technol. Lett., Vol. 58, No. 6, 1390-1394, Jun. 2016.
doi:10.1002/mop.29804

9. Zhao, J. Y., Z. Y. Zhang, Q. Q. Liu, G. Fu, and S. X. Gong, "Printed UWB MIMO antenna with different polarizations and band-notch characteristics," Progress In Electromagnetics Research Letters, Vol. 46, 113-118, Jun. 2014.
doi:10.2528/PIERL14050502

10. Gupta, K. C., R. Garg, I. J. Bhal, and P. Bhartia, Microstrip Lines and Slotlines, 2nd Ed., 10-15, Artech House, 1996.

11. Baena, J. D., J. Bonache, F. Martín, R. M. Sillero, F. Falcone, et al. "Equivalent-circuit models for split-ring resonators and complementary split-ring resonators coupled to planar transmission lines," IEEE Trans. on Micro. Theory and Tech., Vol. 53, No. 4, 1451-1461, Apr. 2005.
doi:10.1109/TMTT.2005.845211

12. Kang, L., H. Li, X. Wang, and X. Shi, "Compact offset microstrip-fed MIMO antenna for band-notched UWB applications," IEEE Antennas Wireless Propag. Lett., Vol. 14, 1754-1757, Apr. 2015.
doi:10.1109/LAWP.2015.2422571

13. Gao, P., S. He, X. Wei, Z. Xu, N. Wang, and Y. Zheng, "Compact printed UWB diversity slot antenna with 5.5-GHz band-notched characteristics," IEEE Antennas Wireless Propag. Lett., Vol. 13, 376-379, Jan. 2014.

14. Liu, L., S. W. Cheung, and T. I. Yuk, "Compact MIMO antenna for portable UWB applications with band-notched characteristic," IEEE Trans. Antennas Propag., Vol. 63, No. 5, 1917-1924, May 2015.
doi:10.1109/TAP.2015.2406892

15. Ibrahim, A. A., J. Machac, and R. M. Shubair, "Compact UWB MIMO antenna with pattern diversity and band rejection characteristics," Microwave and Optical Tech. Lett., Vol. 59, No. 6, 1460-1464, Jun. 2017.
doi:10.1002/mop.30564

16. Latif, F., F. A. Tahir, M. U. Khan, and M. S. Sharawi, "An ultra-wide band diversity antenna with band-rejection capability for imaging applications," Microwave and Optical Tech. Lett., Vol. 59, No. 7, 1661-1668, May 2017.
doi:10.1002/mop.30603

17. Liu, G., Y. Liu, and S. Gong, "Compact uniplanar UWB MIMO antenna with band-notched characteristic," Microwave and Optical Tech. Lett., Vol. 59, No. 9, 2207-2212, Jun. 2017.
doi:10.1002/mop.30700