Vol. 61
Latest Volume
All Volumes
PIERL 123 [2025] PIERL 122 [2024] PIERL 121 [2024] PIERL 120 [2024] PIERL 119 [2024] PIERL 118 [2024] PIERL 117 [2024] PIERL 116 [2024] PIERL 115 [2024] PIERL 114 [2023] PIERL 113 [2023] PIERL 112 [2023] PIERL 111 [2023] PIERL 110 [2023] PIERL 109 [2023] PIERL 108 [2023] PIERL 107 [2022] PIERL 106 [2022] PIERL 105 [2022] PIERL 104 [2022] PIERL 103 [2022] PIERL 102 [2022] PIERL 101 [2021] PIERL 100 [2021] PIERL 99 [2021] PIERL 98 [2021] PIERL 97 [2021] PIERL 96 [2021] PIERL 95 [2021] PIERL 94 [2020] PIERL 93 [2020] PIERL 92 [2020] PIERL 91 [2020] PIERL 90 [2020] PIERL 89 [2020] PIERL 88 [2020] PIERL 87 [2019] PIERL 86 [2019] PIERL 85 [2019] PIERL 84 [2019] PIERL 83 [2019] PIERL 82 [2019] PIERL 81 [2019] PIERL 80 [2018] PIERL 79 [2018] PIERL 78 [2018] PIERL 77 [2018] PIERL 76 [2018] PIERL 75 [2018] PIERL 74 [2018] PIERL 73 [2018] PIERL 72 [2018] PIERL 71 [2017] PIERL 70 [2017] PIERL 69 [2017] PIERL 68 [2017] PIERL 67 [2017] PIERL 66 [2017] PIERL 65 [2017] PIERL 64 [2016] PIERL 63 [2016] PIERL 62 [2016] PIERL 61 [2016] PIERL 60 [2016] PIERL 59 [2016] PIERL 58 [2016] PIERL 57 [2015] PIERL 56 [2015] PIERL 55 [2015] PIERL 54 [2015] PIERL 53 [2015] PIERL 52 [2015] PIERL 51 [2015] PIERL 50 [2014] PIERL 49 [2014] PIERL 48 [2014] PIERL 47 [2014] PIERL 46 [2014] PIERL 45 [2014] PIERL 44 [2014] PIERL 43 [2013] PIERL 42 [2013] PIERL 41 [2013] PIERL 40 [2013] PIERL 39 [2013] PIERL 38 [2013] PIERL 37 [2013] PIERL 36 [2013] PIERL 35 [2012] PIERL 34 [2012] PIERL 33 [2012] PIERL 32 [2012] PIERL 31 [2012] PIERL 30 [2012] PIERL 29 [2012] PIERL 28 [2012] PIERL 27 [2011] PIERL 26 [2011] PIERL 25 [2011] PIERL 24 [2011] PIERL 23 [2011] PIERL 22 [2011] PIERL 21 [2011] PIERL 20 [2011] PIERL 19 [2010] PIERL 18 [2010] PIERL 17 [2010] PIERL 16 [2010] PIERL 15 [2010] PIERL 14 [2010] PIERL 13 [2010] PIERL 12 [2009] PIERL 11 [2009] PIERL 10 [2009] PIERL 9 [2009] PIERL 8 [2009] PIERL 7 [2009] PIERL 6 [2009] PIERL 5 [2008] PIERL 4 [2008] PIERL 3 [2008] PIERL 2 [2008] PIERL 1 [2008]
2016-07-22
Analysis of Different Probe Geometries for Ethanol Fuel Qualification Using Time-Domain Reflectometry
By
Progress In Electromagnetics Research Letters, Vol. 61, 105-109, 2016
Abstract
This paper proposes sensors based on the time-domain reflectometry (TDR) technique for qualifying ethanol fuel. Four different probe geometries were proposed: bifilar, microstrip, coaxial, and helical. All probes allowed qualification of ethanol adulterated with water. Helical probe showed the best response. Thus, this proposal contributes to the development of electronic tongues.
Citation
Daniel Bras Rochinha Rodrigues, Wesley Beccaro, Henrique E. M. Peres, and Fatima S. Correra, "Analysis of Different Probe Geometries for Ethanol Fuel Qualification Using Time-Domain Reflectometry," Progress In Electromagnetics Research Letters, Vol. 61, 105-109, 2016.
doi:10.2528/PIERL16051909
References

1. Licht, F. O., World Ethanol and Biofuels Report, Vol. 10, No. 16, 323, Apr. 2012.

2. Pedroso, M. P., L. A. F. Godoy, E. C. Ferreira, et al. "Identification of gasoline adulteration using comprehensive two-dimensional gas chromatography combined to multivariate data processing," Journal Chromatography A, Vol. 1201, 176-182, Aug. 2008.
doi:10.1016/j.chroma.2008.05.092

3. Rodrigues, D. B. R., W. Becari, and H. E. M. Peres, "Ethanol fuel analysis by time-domain reflectometry," International Microwave and Optoelectronics Conference (IMOC), 2013.

4. Deparis, N., N. Rolland, and P. A. Rolland, "Monolithic 10 GHz TDR/TDT analyser with novel architecture," Electronics Letters, Vol. 43, No. 1, 38-39, Jan. 2007.
doi:10.1049/el:20072380

5. Cataldo, A., L. Tarricone, F. Attivissimo, et al. "A TDR method for real-time monitoring of liquids," IEEE Trans. on Instrum. and Meas., Vol. 56, No. 5, 1616-1625, Oct. 2007.
doi:10.1109/TIM.2007.903596

6. Pandey, G., E. T. Thostenson, and D. Heider, "Electric time domain reflectometry sensors for non-invasive structural health monitoring of glass fiber composites," Progress In Electromagnetics Research, Vol. 137, 551-564, 2013.
doi:10.2528/PIER13020611

7. Cataldo, A., G. Cannazza, E. De Benedetto, and N. Giaquinto, "Experimental validation of a TDR-based system for measuring leak distances in buried metal pipes," Progress In Electromagnetics Research, Vol. 132, 71-90, 2012.
doi:10.2528/PIER12081402

8. Will, B. and M. Gerding, "Characterization of dielectric profiles by using microwave delay time measurements," Microwave Conference, 917-920, 2008.

9. Ferre, P. A., J. H. Knight, D. L. Rudolph, et al. "A numerically based analysis of the sensitivity of conventional and alternative time domain reflectometry probes," Water Resources Research, Vol. 36, No. 9, 2461-2468, Sep. 2000.
doi:10.1029/2000WR900119