Vol. 48
Latest Volume
All Volumes
PIERL 123 [2025] PIERL 122 [2024] PIERL 121 [2024] PIERL 120 [2024] PIERL 119 [2024] PIERL 118 [2024] PIERL 117 [2024] PIERL 116 [2024] PIERL 115 [2024] PIERL 114 [2023] PIERL 113 [2023] PIERL 112 [2023] PIERL 111 [2023] PIERL 110 [2023] PIERL 109 [2023] PIERL 108 [2023] PIERL 107 [2022] PIERL 106 [2022] PIERL 105 [2022] PIERL 104 [2022] PIERL 103 [2022] PIERL 102 [2022] PIERL 101 [2021] PIERL 100 [2021] PIERL 99 [2021] PIERL 98 [2021] PIERL 97 [2021] PIERL 96 [2021] PIERL 95 [2021] PIERL 94 [2020] PIERL 93 [2020] PIERL 92 [2020] PIERL 91 [2020] PIERL 90 [2020] PIERL 89 [2020] PIERL 88 [2020] PIERL 87 [2019] PIERL 86 [2019] PIERL 85 [2019] PIERL 84 [2019] PIERL 83 [2019] PIERL 82 [2019] PIERL 81 [2019] PIERL 80 [2018] PIERL 79 [2018] PIERL 78 [2018] PIERL 77 [2018] PIERL 76 [2018] PIERL 75 [2018] PIERL 74 [2018] PIERL 73 [2018] PIERL 72 [2018] PIERL 71 [2017] PIERL 70 [2017] PIERL 69 [2017] PIERL 68 [2017] PIERL 67 [2017] PIERL 66 [2017] PIERL 65 [2017] PIERL 64 [2016] PIERL 63 [2016] PIERL 62 [2016] PIERL 61 [2016] PIERL 60 [2016] PIERL 59 [2016] PIERL 58 [2016] PIERL 57 [2015] PIERL 56 [2015] PIERL 55 [2015] PIERL 54 [2015] PIERL 53 [2015] PIERL 52 [2015] PIERL 51 [2015] PIERL 50 [2014] PIERL 49 [2014] PIERL 48 [2014] PIERL 47 [2014] PIERL 46 [2014] PIERL 45 [2014] PIERL 44 [2014] PIERL 43 [2013] PIERL 42 [2013] PIERL 41 [2013] PIERL 40 [2013] PIERL 39 [2013] PIERL 38 [2013] PIERL 37 [2013] PIERL 36 [2013] PIERL 35 [2012] PIERL 34 [2012] PIERL 33 [2012] PIERL 32 [2012] PIERL 31 [2012] PIERL 30 [2012] PIERL 29 [2012] PIERL 28 [2012] PIERL 27 [2011] PIERL 26 [2011] PIERL 25 [2011] PIERL 24 [2011] PIERL 23 [2011] PIERL 22 [2011] PIERL 21 [2011] PIERL 20 [2011] PIERL 19 [2010] PIERL 18 [2010] PIERL 17 [2010] PIERL 16 [2010] PIERL 15 [2010] PIERL 14 [2010] PIERL 13 [2010] PIERL 12 [2009] PIERL 11 [2009] PIERL 10 [2009] PIERL 9 [2009] PIERL 8 [2009] PIERL 7 [2009] PIERL 6 [2009] PIERL 5 [2008] PIERL 4 [2008] PIERL 3 [2008] PIERL 2 [2008] PIERL 1 [2008]
2014-08-21
A Novel Measurement System for the Common-Mode- and Differential-Mode- Conducted Electromagnetic Interference
By
Progress In Electromagnetics Research Letters, Vol. 48, 75-81, 2014
Abstract
Electromagnetic Interference (EMI) test is an important part for the manufacture of power electronic equipment, which helps us not only analyze the noise characteristics of the Equipment Under Test (EUT) but also design EMI filters. The previous separation method for the Common Mode (CM) and Differential Mode (DM) noise was time consuming or costly. In this paper, a novel measurement system for CM and DM conducted EMI is described showing a good performance. The system consists of two parts, part 1: getting CM noise or DM noise through a current probe; part 2: obtaining another mode noise from a software-based method. A 150w switch mode power supply is measured to verify the proposed measurement system. The noise spectra of CM and DM signal is shown, and the results obtained by software program are compared with those obtained from a current probe measurement showing a good concordance in terms of peak value.
Citation
Qiang Feng, Cheng Liao, and Xiang-Zheng Xiong, "A Novel Measurement System for the Common-Mode- and Differential-Mode- Conducted Electromagnetic Interference," Progress In Electromagnetics Research Letters, Vol. 48, 75-81, 2014.
doi:10.2528/PIERL14053001
References

1. Zhong, E. and T. A. Lipo, "Improvements in EMC performance of inverter-fed motor drives," IEEE Transactions on Industry Applications, Vol. 31, No. 6, 1247-1256, 1995.
doi:10.1109/28.475694

2. Kumar, M. and V. Agarwal, "Power line filter design for conducted electromagnetic interference using time domain measurements," IEEE Transactions on Electromagnetic Compatibility, Vol. 48, No. 1, 178-186, 2006.
doi:10.1109/TEMC.2006.870697

3. Kahoul, R., Y. Azzouz, B. Ravelo, and B. Mazari, "New behavioral modeling of EMI for DC motors applied to EMC characterization," IEEE Transactions on Industrial Electronics, Vol. 60, No. 12, 5482-5496, 2013.
doi:10.1109/TIE.2012.2232257

4. Caponet, M. C., F. Profumo, and A. Tenconi, "EMI filters design for power electronics," IEEE 33rd Annual Power Electronics Specialists Conference, 2027-2032, Jun. 23-27, 2002.

5. Philip, F. O. and H. Lothar, "Computer-aided analysis and reduction of conducted EMI in switched-mode power converter," IEEE 13th Annual Applied Power Electronics Conference, 924-928, Feb. 15-19, 1998.

6. Tan, W. H., C. Cuellar, X. Margueron, and N. Idir, "A high frequency equivalent circuit and parameter extraction procedure for common mode choke in the EMI filter," IEEE Transactions on Power Electronics, Vol. 28, No. 3, 1157-1166, 2013.
doi:10.1109/TPEL.2012.2209206

7. Kovacic, M., Z. Hanic, S. Stjepan, S. Krishnamurthy, and D. Zarko, "Analytical wideband model of a common-mode choke," IEEE Transactions on Power Electronics, Vol. 27, No. 7, 3173-3185, 2012.
doi:10.1109/TPEL.2011.2182060

8. Wang, S., F. C. Lee, and W. G. Odendaal, "Characterization, evaluation, and design of noise separator for conducted EMI noise diagnosis," IEEE Transactions on Power Electronics, Vol. 20, No. 4, 974-982, 2005.
doi:10.1109/TPEL.2005.850978

9. See, K. Y. and N. C. Sum, "Diagnosis of conducted interference with discrimination network," Proceedings of International Conference on Power Electronics and Drive System, 433-437, Feb. 21-24, 1995.

10. Paul, C.-R. and K.-B. Hardin, "Diagnosis and reduction of conducted noise emission," IEEE Transactions on Electromagnetic Compatibility, Vol. 30, No. 4, 553-560, 1988.
doi:10.1109/15.8769

11. See, K. Y., "Network for conducted EMI diagnosis," Electronics Letters, Vol. 35, No. 17, 1446-1447, 1999.
doi:10.1049/el:19990968

12. Guo, T., D.-Y. Chen, and F.-C. Lee, "Separation of the common mode and differential mode conducted EMI noise," IEEE Transactions on Power Electronics, Vol. 11, No. 3, 480-488, 1996.
doi:10.1109/63.491642

13. Lo, Y.-K., H.-J. Chiu, and T.-H. Song, "A software-based CM and DM measurement system for conducted EMI," IEEE Transactions on Industrial Electronics, Vol. 47, No. 4, 253-255, 2000.
doi:10.1109/41.857968

14. Nave, M.-J., "A novel differential mode rejection network for conducted emissions diagnostics," IEEE National Symposium on Electromagnetic Compatibility, 223-227, May 23-25, 1989.