Vol. 35
Latest Volume
All Volumes
PIERM 130 [2024] PIERM 129 [2024] PIERM 128 [2024] PIERM 127 [2024] PIERM 126 [2024] PIERM 125 [2024] PIERM 124 [2024] PIERM 123 [2024] PIERM 122 [2023] PIERM 121 [2023] PIERM 120 [2023] PIERM 119 [2023] PIERM 118 [2023] PIERM 117 [2023] PIERM 116 [2023] PIERM 115 [2023] PIERM 114 [2022] PIERM 113 [2022] PIERM 112 [2022] PIERM 111 [2022] PIERM 110 [2022] PIERM 109 [2022] PIERM 108 [2022] PIERM 107 [2022] PIERM 106 [2021] PIERM 105 [2021] PIERM 104 [2021] PIERM 103 [2021] PIERM 102 [2021] PIERM 101 [2021] PIERM 100 [2021] PIERM 99 [2021] PIERM 98 [2020] PIERM 97 [2020] PIERM 96 [2020] PIERM 95 [2020] PIERM 94 [2020] PIERM 93 [2020] PIERM 92 [2020] PIERM 91 [2020] PIERM 90 [2020] PIERM 89 [2020] PIERM 88 [2020] PIERM 87 [2019] PIERM 86 [2019] PIERM 85 [2019] PIERM 84 [2019] PIERM 83 [2019] PIERM 82 [2019] PIERM 81 [2019] PIERM 80 [2019] PIERM 79 [2019] PIERM 78 [2019] PIERM 77 [2019] PIERM 76 [2018] PIERM 75 [2018] PIERM 74 [2018] PIERM 73 [2018] PIERM 72 [2018] PIERM 71 [2018] PIERM 70 [2018] PIERM 69 [2018] PIERM 68 [2018] PIERM 67 [2018] PIERM 66 [2018] PIERM 65 [2018] PIERM 64 [2018] PIERM 63 [2018] PIERM 62 [2017] PIERM 61 [2017] PIERM 60 [2017] PIERM 59 [2017] PIERM 58 [2017] PIERM 57 [2017] PIERM 56 [2017] PIERM 55 [2017] PIERM 54 [2017] PIERM 53 [2017] PIERM 52 [2016] PIERM 51 [2016] PIERM 50 [2016] PIERM 49 [2016] PIERM 48 [2016] PIERM 47 [2016] PIERM 46 [2016] PIERM 45 [2016] PIERM 44 [2015] PIERM 43 [2015] PIERM 42 [2015] PIERM 41 [2015] PIERM 40 [2014] PIERM 39 [2014] PIERM 38 [2014] PIERM 37 [2014] PIERM 36 [2014] PIERM 35 [2014] PIERM 34 [2014] PIERM 33 [2013] PIERM 32 [2013] PIERM 31 [2013] PIERM 30 [2013] PIERM 29 [2013] PIERM 28 [2013] PIERM 27 [2012] PIERM 26 [2012] PIERM 25 [2012] PIERM 24 [2012] PIERM 23 [2012] PIERM 22 [2012] PIERM 21 [2011] PIERM 20 [2011] PIERM 19 [2011] PIERM 18 [2011] PIERM 17 [2011] PIERM 16 [2011] PIERM 14 [2010] PIERM 13 [2010] PIERM 12 [2010] PIERM 11 [2010] PIERM 10 [2009] PIERM 9 [2009] PIERM 8 [2009] PIERM 7 [2009] PIERM 6 [2009] PIERM 5 [2008] PIERM 4 [2008] PIERM 3 [2008] PIERM 2 [2008] PIERM 1 [2008]
2014-03-31
The Research on Flux Linkage Characteristic Based on BP and RBF Neural Network for Switched Reluctance Motor
By
Progress In Electromagnetics Research M, Vol. 35, 151-161, 2014
Abstract
The flux and torque of switched reluctance motor (SRM) have a highly nonlinear functional relationship with rotor position and phase current, as a consequence of the double-salient structure of the stator and rotor pole and highly magnetic saturation, which is difficult to build an accurate analytic model. In order to achieve the SRM high-performance control, it is necessary to build an accurate nonlinear model for SRM. On the basis of the adequate and precise sample data, by taking advantage of neural network that has outstanding nonlinear mapping capability, this paper adopts the Back Propagation (BP) based on Levenberg-Marquardt (LM) algorithm and Radial Basis Function (RBF) neural networkto build offline models for SRM respectively. Under different requirements of model accuracy, two kinds of network are studied and compared with each other on accuracy, scale and other aspects. The research results indicate that the network scale built as SRM nonlinear model by BP neural network based on LM algorithm is smaller than the one built by RBF. Additionally, the model accuracy is higher. In terms of the Switched Reluctance Drive (SRD) which requires real-time controller, reducing the network scale will be beneficial to the online real-time control of the system.
Citation
Yan Cai, Siyuan Sun, Chenhui Wang, and Chao Gao, "The Research on Flux Linkage Characteristic Based on BP and RBF Neural Network for Switched Reluctance Motor," Progress In Electromagnetics Research M, Vol. 35, 151-161, 2014.
doi:10.2528/PIERM14011604
References

1. Stephenson, J. M. and J. Corda, "Computation of torque and current in doubly salient reluctance motors from nonlinear magnetization data," IEE Proceedings, Vol. 126, No. 5, 393-396, 1979.

2. Chi, H. P., R. L. Lin, and J. F. Chen, "Simplified flux linkage model for switched reluctance motors," IEE Proceedings of Electrical Power Application, Vol. 152, No. 3, 577-583, 2005.
doi:10.1049/ip-epa:20045207

3. Roux, C. and M. M. Morcos, "A simple model for switched reluctance motors," IEEE Power Engineering Review, Vol. 20, No. 10, 49-52, 2000.
doi:10.1109/39.876885

4. Xue, X. D., K. W. E. Cheng, S. L. Ho, and K. F. Kwok, "Trigonometry-based numerical method to compute nonlinear magnetic characteristics in switched reluctance motor," IEEE Transactions on Magnetics, Vol. 43, No. 4, 1845-1848, 2007.
doi:10.1109/TMAG.2007.892619

5. Ilic'-Spong, M., R. Marino, S. M. Peresada, and D. Taylor, "Feedback linearizing control of switched reluctance motors," IEEE Transactions on Automation Control, Vol. 32, No. 5, 371-379, 1987.
doi:10.1109/TAC.1987.1104616

6. Xu, L. and E. Ruchkstater, "Direct modeling of switched reluctance machine by coupled field-circuit method," IEEE Transactions Energy Conversion, Vol. 10, No. 3, 446-454, 1995.
doi:10.1109/60.464867

7. Sun, Y., J. Wu, and Q. Xiang, "The mathematic model of bearingless switched reluctance motor based on the finite-element analysis," Proceedings of the CSEE, Vol. 27, No. 12, 33-40, 2007.

8. Sahoo, N. C., S. K. Panda, and P. K. Dash, "A fuzzy logic based current modulator for torque ripple minimization in switched reluctance motors," Electric Machines and Power Systems, Vol. 27, No. 2, 181-194, 1999.
doi:10.1080/073135699269389

9. Elmas, C., S. Sagiroglu, I. Colak, and G. Bal, "Modeling of a nonlinear switched reluctance drive based on artificial neural networks," Power Electronics and Variable-Speed Drives, 7-12, 1994.

10. Cai, J., Z. Q. Deng, R. Y. Qi, Z. Y. Liu, and Y. H. Cai, "A novel BVC-RBF neural network based system simulation model for switched reluctance motor," IEEE Transactions on Magnetics, Vol. 47, No. 4, 830-838, 2011.
doi:10.1109/TMAG.2011.2105273

11. Xiu, J., C. Xia, and S. Wang, "Modeling of switched reluctance motor based on pi-sigma fuzzy neural network," Transactions of China Electrotechnical Society, Vol. 24, No. 8, 46-64, 2009.

12. Liang, D. and W. Ding, "Modeling and predicting of a switched reluctance motor drive using radial basis function network-based adaptive fuzzy system," IET Electric Power Applications, Vol. 3, No. 3, 218-230, 2009.
doi:10.1049/iet-epa.2008.0096

13. Xu, A., Y. Fan, and Z. Li, "Modeling of switched reluctance motor based on GA-ANFIS," Electric Machines and Control, Vol. 15, No. 7, 54-59, 2011.

14. Si, L., H. Lin, and Z. Liu, "Modeling of switched reluctance motors based on LS-SVM," Proceedings of the CSEE, Vol. 27, No. 6, 26-30, 2007.

15. Shang, W., S. Zhao, and Y. Shen, "Application of LSSVM optimized by genetic algorithm to modeling of switched reluctance motor," Proceedings of the CSEE, Vol. 29, No. 12, 65-69, 2009.

16. Lachman, T., T. R. Mohamad, and C. H. Fong, "Nonlinear modeling of switched reluctance motors using artificial intelligence techniques," IEE Proceedings of Electrical Power Application, Vol. 151, No. 1, 53-60, 2004.
doi:10.1049/ip-epa:20040025

17. Cai, Y., Z. Xu, and C. Gao, "Building of a nonlinear model of switched reluctance motor by BP neural networks," Journal of Tianjin University, Vol. 38, No. 10, 869-873, 2005.