volume | PIER Journals

Abstract

The probe correction technique applied to reactive near field characterization is based on a deconvolution process. However, the classical deconvolution based on an inverse Fourier transform has a restrictive limitation. It is based on the use of noiseless measurement data. Consequently, measurement noise makes the result obtained by the classical deconvolution based technique inefficient and requires an extremely low noise measurement facility. In this paper, a method to improve the probe correction stability when using corrupted measurement data is presented. The proposed constrained least squares filtering algorithm (CLSF) uses an inverse filtering approach that takes into account the statistical characteristics of the measurement noise. Computations data with electromagnetic software of two different structures validate this method and illustrate its reliability.

1. Slater, D., Near-Field Antenna Measurements, Artech House, Boston, London, 1991.

2. Slattery, K., J. W. Neal, and W. Cui, "Near-field measurements of VLSI devices," IEEE Trans. on Electromagnetic Compatibility, Vol. 41, No. 4, 374-384, November 1999.
doi:10.1109/15.809825

3. Tankielun, A., P. Kralicek, U. Keller, E. Sicard, and B. Vrignon, "Influence of core optimisation and activity for electromagnetic near-field and conducted emissions of CESAME test chip," 4th International Workshop on Electromagnetic Compatibility of Integrated Circuits, Vol. 4, 95-100, 2004.

4. Las-Heras, F. and T. K. Sarkar, "Integrated Circuits for source reconstruction and NF-FF transformation using amplitude-only data," IEEE International Symposium on EMC, Vol. 50, No. 4, 500-510, 2002.

5. Sarkar, T. K. and F. Las-Heras, "An iterative spherical near-field to far-field emissions and source reconstruction using the equivalent current approach," IEEE International Symposium on EMC, Vol. 1, 395-398, 2001.

6. Riah, Z., D. Baudry, M. Kadi, A. Louis, and B. Mazari, "Post-processing of electric field measurements to calibrate a near-field dipole probe," IET Sci. Meas. Technol, Vol. 5, No. 2, 29-36, 2011.
doi:10.1049/iet-smt.2010.0031

7. Tankielun, A., U. Keller, W. John, and H. Garbe, "Complex deconvolution for improvement of standard monopole near-field measurement results," 16th Int. Zurich Symp., EMC200, Zurich, 2005.

8. Shi, J., M. A. Cracraft, K. P. Slattery, M. Yamaguchi, and R. E. DuBroff, "Calibration and compensation of near-field scan measurements," IEEE Journal on Electromagnetic Compatibility, Vol. 47, No. 3, 642-650, 2005.
doi:10.1109/TEMC.2005.853165

9. Bouchlouk, L., "Conception et validation de sondes pour les mesures en champ proches,", Ph.D. Thesis, University Pris sud XI, 2006.

10. Gonzales, R. C. and R. E. Woods, Digital Image Processing, Addison-Wesley Publishing Company, PAYS, 1993.

11. Petrou, M. and P. Bostogianni, Image Processing: The Fundamentals, Wiley, UK, 1999.

12. Yeoh, W. S. and C. Zhang, "Constrained least squares filtering algorithm for ultrasound image deconvolution," IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering, Vol. 53, No. 10, 2001-2007, 2006.
doi:10.1109/TBME.2006.881781

13. Schneider, B., "Plane waves in FDTD simulations and a nearly perfect total-field/scattered-field boundary," IEEE Transactions on Antennas and Propagation, Vol. 52, No. 12, 3280-3287, 2004.
doi:10.1109/TAP.2004.836403

14. CST, GmbH, "From design to reality," Microwave Journal, Vol. 47, No. 1, 2004.

Dr. Mohammed Anisse Moutaouekkil

Dr. Abdelhak Ziyyat

Dr. Mohammed Serhir

Dr. Dominique Picard