Vol. 36
Latest Volume
All Volumes
PIERB 109 [2024] PIERB 108 [2024] PIERB 107 [2024] PIERB 106 [2024] PIERB 105 [2024] PIERB 104 [2024] PIERB 103 [2023] PIERB 102 [2023] PIERB 101 [2023] PIERB 100 [2023] PIERB 99 [2023] PIERB 98 [2023] PIERB 97 [2022] PIERB 96 [2022] PIERB 95 [2022] PIERB 94 [2021] PIERB 93 [2021] PIERB 92 [2021] PIERB 91 [2021] PIERB 90 [2021] PIERB 89 [2020] PIERB 88 [2020] PIERB 87 [2020] PIERB 86 [2020] PIERB 85 [2019] PIERB 84 [2019] PIERB 83 [2019] PIERB 82 [2018] PIERB 81 [2018] PIERB 80 [2018] PIERB 79 [2017] PIERB 78 [2017] PIERB 77 [2017] PIERB 76 [2017] PIERB 75 [2017] PIERB 74 [2017] PIERB 73 [2017] PIERB 72 [2017] PIERB 71 [2016] PIERB 70 [2016] PIERB 69 [2016] PIERB 68 [2016] PIERB 67 [2016] PIERB 66 [2016] PIERB 65 [2016] PIERB 64 [2015] PIERB 63 [2015] PIERB 62 [2015] PIERB 61 [2014] PIERB 60 [2014] PIERB 59 [2014] PIERB 58 [2014] PIERB 57 [2014] PIERB 56 [2013] PIERB 55 [2013] PIERB 54 [2013] PIERB 53 [2013] PIERB 52 [2013] PIERB 51 [2013] PIERB 50 [2013] PIERB 49 [2013] PIERB 48 [2013] PIERB 47 [2013] PIERB 46 [2013] PIERB 45 [2012] PIERB 44 [2012] PIERB 43 [2012] PIERB 42 [2012] PIERB 41 [2012] PIERB 40 [2012] PIERB 39 [2012] PIERB 38 [2012] PIERB 37 [2012] PIERB 36 [2012] PIERB 35 [2011] PIERB 34 [2011] PIERB 33 [2011] PIERB 32 [2011] PIERB 31 [2011] PIERB 30 [2011] PIERB 29 [2011] PIERB 28 [2011] PIERB 27 [2011] PIERB 26 [2010] PIERB 25 [2010] PIERB 24 [2010] PIERB 23 [2010] PIERB 22 [2010] PIERB 21 [2010] PIERB 20 [2010] PIERB 19 [2010] PIERB 18 [2009] PIERB 17 [2009] PIERB 16 [2009] PIERB 15 [2009] PIERB 14 [2009] PIERB 13 [2009] PIERB 12 [2009] PIERB 11 [2009] PIERB 10 [2008] PIERB 9 [2008] PIERB 8 [2008] PIERB 7 [2008] PIERB 6 [2008] PIERB 5 [2008] PIERB 4 [2008] PIERB 3 [2008] PIERB 2 [2008] PIERB 1 [2008]
2011-11-15
Vegetation Attenuation Measurements and Modeling in Plantations for Wireless Sensor Network Planning
By
Progress In Electromagnetics Research B, Vol. 36, 283-301, 2012
Abstract
As wireless communication moves from long to short ranges with considerably lower antenna heights, the need to understand and be able to predict the impact of vegetation on coverage and quality of wireless services has become very important. This paper focuses on vegetation attenuation measurements for frequencies in the range 0.4-7.2 GHz in mango and oil palm plantations to evaluate vegetation attenuation models for application in wireless sensor network planning and deployment in precision agriculture. Although a number of models have been proposed and evaluated for specific frequencies, results show that these models do not perform well when applied to different vegetation types or at different frequencies. A global assessment of the models using a broad range of frequencies shows that the COST 235 model gives more consistent results when there is vegetation in the propagation path. For grid-like plantation, the study shows that the RET model provides the best prediction of path loss for measurements between two rows of trees. However, taking into account the limited number of parameter values available for the RET model and the potential inaccuracy that may results from the use of a wrong parameter value, a sub-optimal model which combines the ITUR model with ground reflection does offer a more consistent prediction. The differences in the average values of RMS error between RET, ITUR and free space loss models when combined with ground reflection is less than 1.6 dB.
Citation
David Lorater Ndzi, Latifah M. Kamarudin, Abdul Aziz Muhammad Ezanuddin, Ammar Zakaria, Raad Badlishah Ahmad, Mohd Fareq Bin Abd Malek, Ali Yeon Md. Shakaff, and M. N. Jafaar, "Vegetation Attenuation Measurements and Modeling in Plantations for Wireless Sensor Network Planning," Progress In Electromagnetics Research B, Vol. 36, 283-301, 2012.
doi:10.2528/PIERB11091908
References

1. Savage, , N., D. L. Ndzi, A. Seville, E. Vilar, and J. Austin, "Radiowave propagation through vegetation: Factors influencing signal attenuation," Radio Science, Vol. 38, No. 5, 1088, Sep. 2003.

2. Seville, , A., K. H. Craig, and , "Semi-empirical model for millimeter-wave vegetation attenuation rates," Elects. Letters, Vol. 31, No. 17, 1507-1508, 1995.

3. COST 235, "Radiowave propagation effects on next generation fixed services terrestrial telecommunications systems," Final Report, Commission of the European Union, ISBN 92-827-8023-6.

4. Shukla, A., et al., "A generic vegetation attenuation model for 1--60 GHz: PM 3035,", Sep. 2011.
doi:http://www.ofcom.org.uk/static/archive/ra/topics/research/topics

5. Qineti, Q., "A generic model of 1--60 GHz radio propagation through vegetation --- Final report," Report Qinetiq/ki/com/cr0201961/1.0, 2002.
doi:http://www.ofcom.org.uk/static/archive/ra/topics/research/topics

6. ITU-R Rec 833-6, Attenuation in vegetation, International Telecom. Union, Aug. 2007.
doi://www.itu.int/rec/R-REC-P.833-6-200702-I/en

7., Johnson, R. A. and F. Shwering, "Johnson, R. A. and F. Shwering," CECOM Report, 1985., 20210.

8. Meng, Y. H. Lee, and B. C. Ng, , Vol. 12, 131-141, 2010.

9., Meng, Y. S., Y. H. Lee, and B. C. Ng, "The effects of tropical weather on radio-wave propagation over foliage channel," IEEE Transaction on Vehicular Technology, Vol. 58, No. 8, 4023-4030, Oct. 2009.

10. Meng, , Y. S., Y. H. Lee, and B. C. Ng, "Further study of rainfall effect on VHF forested radio-wave propagation with four-layered model ," Progress In Electromagnetics Research, Vol. 99, 149-161, 2009.

11. Meng, , Y. S., Y. H. Lee, and , "Investigation of foliage effect on modern wireless communication systems: A review," Progress In Electromagnetics Research, Vol. 105, 313-332, 2010.

12..

13. Swanson, , A., S. Huang, and A. Crabtree, "Using a LI-DAR vegetation model to predict UHF SAR attenuation in coniferous forests," Sensors, Vol. 9, 1559-1573, 2009.
doi:http://www.mdpi.com/journal/sensors, Accessed Sep. 10, 2011

14. Gomez, , P., I. Cuinas, A. V. Alejos, M. G. Sanchez, and J. A. Gay-Fernandez, "Analysis of the performance of vegetation barriers to reduce electromagnetic pollution," IET Microwaves, Antennas & Propagation, Vol. 5, No. 6, 651-663, Apr. 2011.

15. Gay-Fernandez, , A., S. M. Garcia, I. Cuinas, A. V. Alejos, J. G. Sanchez, and J. L. Miranda-Sierra, "Propagation analysis and deployment of a wireless sensor network in a forest," Progress In Electromagnetics Research, Vol. 106, 121-145, 2010.

16. Al-Nuaimi, , M. O., R. B. L. Stephens, and , "Measurements and prediction model optimization for signal attenuation in vegetation media at centimetre wave frequencies ," IEE Proc. Micr. Ant. Prop.,, Vol. 145, No. 3, 201-206, 1998.

17. Weissberger, , M. A., "An initial summary of models for predicting the attenuation of radio waves by trees," ESD-TR-81-101, EMC Analysis Center, , 1982.

18. "Moog Crossbow, Wireless Sensor Provider,".
doi:http://www.xbow.com, Accessed Sep. 10, 2011.

19. Kanakaris, V., D. Ndzi, and K. Ovaliadis, "Improving the performance of AODV using dynamic density driven route request forwarding ," International Journal of Wireless & Mobile Networks (IJWMN) , Vol. 3, No. 3, Jun. 2011.