Vol. 20
Latest Volume
All Volumes
PIERL 123 [2025] PIERL 122 [2024] PIERL 121 [2024] PIERL 120 [2024] PIERL 119 [2024] PIERL 118 [2024] PIERL 117 [2024] PIERL 116 [2024] PIERL 115 [2024] PIERL 114 [2023] PIERL 113 [2023] PIERL 112 [2023] PIERL 111 [2023] PIERL 110 [2023] PIERL 109 [2023] PIERL 108 [2023] PIERL 107 [2022] PIERL 106 [2022] PIERL 105 [2022] PIERL 104 [2022] PIERL 103 [2022] PIERL 102 [2022] PIERL 101 [2021] PIERL 100 [2021] PIERL 99 [2021] PIERL 98 [2021] PIERL 97 [2021] PIERL 96 [2021] PIERL 95 [2021] PIERL 94 [2020] PIERL 93 [2020] PIERL 92 [2020] PIERL 91 [2020] PIERL 90 [2020] PIERL 89 [2020] PIERL 88 [2020] PIERL 87 [2019] PIERL 86 [2019] PIERL 85 [2019] PIERL 84 [2019] PIERL 83 [2019] PIERL 82 [2019] PIERL 81 [2019] PIERL 80 [2018] PIERL 79 [2018] PIERL 78 [2018] PIERL 77 [2018] PIERL 76 [2018] PIERL 75 [2018] PIERL 74 [2018] PIERL 73 [2018] PIERL 72 [2018] PIERL 71 [2017] PIERL 70 [2017] PIERL 69 [2017] PIERL 68 [2017] PIERL 67 [2017] PIERL 66 [2017] PIERL 65 [2017] PIERL 64 [2016] PIERL 63 [2016] PIERL 62 [2016] PIERL 61 [2016] PIERL 60 [2016] PIERL 59 [2016] PIERL 58 [2016] PIERL 57 [2015] PIERL 56 [2015] PIERL 55 [2015] PIERL 54 [2015] PIERL 53 [2015] PIERL 52 [2015] PIERL 51 [2015] PIERL 50 [2014] PIERL 49 [2014] PIERL 48 [2014] PIERL 47 [2014] PIERL 46 [2014] PIERL 45 [2014] PIERL 44 [2014] PIERL 43 [2013] PIERL 42 [2013] PIERL 41 [2013] PIERL 40 [2013] PIERL 39 [2013] PIERL 38 [2013] PIERL 37 [2013] PIERL 36 [2013] PIERL 35 [2012] PIERL 34 [2012] PIERL 33 [2012] PIERL 32 [2012] PIERL 31 [2012] PIERL 30 [2012] PIERL 29 [2012] PIERL 28 [2012] PIERL 27 [2011] PIERL 26 [2011] PIERL 25 [2011] PIERL 24 [2011] PIERL 23 [2011] PIERL 22 [2011] PIERL 21 [2011] PIERL 20 [2011] PIERL 19 [2010] PIERL 18 [2010] PIERL 17 [2010] PIERL 16 [2010] PIERL 15 [2010] PIERL 14 [2010] PIERL 13 [2010] PIERL 12 [2009] PIERL 11 [2009] PIERL 10 [2009] PIERL 9 [2009] PIERL 8 [2009] PIERL 7 [2009] PIERL 6 [2009] PIERL 5 [2008] PIERL 4 [2008] PIERL 3 [2008] PIERL 2 [2008] PIERL 1 [2008]
2011-01-21
Development of Low Cost Measurement System for Radiated Emission Evaluation
By
Progress In Electromagnetics Research Letters, Vol. 20, 55-68, 2011
Abstract
In this paper, a low cost measurement system with high accuracy for radiated emission evaluation has been proposed. By combining the test data of the current probe at different positions on the harness, the measurement accuracy is improved compared with conventional single probe method For the sake of high accuracy, a transfer function is built to map the relationship between anechoic chamber method and current probe method. Based on experiments for evaluation, the final estimation of radiated emission agrees well with the measured results in anechoic chamber. For the cases tested, the difference between the current probe method and the anechoic chamber method is less than 3 dB.
Citation
Zihong Huang, Wenhua Chen, Zhenghe Feng, Kazunori Teshima, and Koji Toyama, "Development of Low Cost Measurement System for Radiated Emission Evaluation," Progress In Electromagnetics Research Letters, Vol. 20, 55-68, 2011.
doi:10.2528/PIERL10101910
References

1. Paul, C. R., Introduction to EMC, 466-474, Wiley & Sons, Inc., New York, 1992.

2. Colotti, J., "EMC design fundamentals," IEEE Systems, Applications and Technology Conference, LISAT 2006, 5-5, Long Island, May 2006.

3. Goedbloed, J. J., "Uncertainties in EMC compliance testing," IEE Colloquium on the Implication of Measurement Uncertainties for EMC Testing, No. 116, June 11, 1997.

4. CISPR 25 "Radio disturbance characteristics for the protection of receivers used on boardvehicles, boats, and on devices --- limits and methods of measurement," International Electrotechnical Commission, August 2002.

5. Harima, K., "Radiated emission measurement of small EUT by using a reverberation chamber," IEEE International Symposium on Electromagnetic Compatibility, May 2003.

6. Rebholz, H. and S. Tenbohlen, "In°uence of automotive harness on conducted emissions," 20th International Zurich Symposium on Electromagnetic Compatibility, January 2009.

7. O'Hara, M. and J. Colebrook, "Automotive EMC test harnesses: standard lengths and their e®ect on conducted emissions," IEEE International Symposium on Electromagnetic Compatibility , Vol. 1, 233-236, 2003.

8. Rebholz, H. and S. Tenbohlen, "A fast radiated emission model for arbitrary cable harness con¯gurations based on measurements and simulations," IEEE International Symposium on Electromagnetic Compatibility, August 2008.

9. FEKO User's Manual Suite 5.2 August 2006, EM Software Systems GmbH.

10. Bockelman, D. and W. Eisenstadt, "Combined differential and common-mode scattering parameters: Theory and simulation," IEEE Transactions on Microwave Theory and Techniques, Vol. 43, No. 7, July 1995.

11. Huang, Z., W. Chen, Z. Feng, K.Toyama, and K. Teshima, "Development of low cost radiated emission measurement system," International Conference on Microwave and Millimeter Wave Technology, 1829-1832, May 2010.
doi:10.1109/ICMMT.2010.5524864

12. Man, Y., J. Gong, H. Chen, Y. Jiang, and Y. Hu, "Design optimization of control parameters for strapdown line-of-sight stable tracking platform based on the Taguchi method," Chinese Control and Decision Conference (CCDC2009), 2009.

13. Stuart, P. G., Taguchi Methods: A Hands-on Approach to Quality Engineering, 4th printing, March 1995.