Vol. 18
Latest Volume
All Volumes
PIERL 123 [2025] PIERL 122 [2024] PIERL 121 [2024] PIERL 120 [2024] PIERL 119 [2024] PIERL 118 [2024] PIERL 117 [2024] PIERL 116 [2024] PIERL 115 [2024] PIERL 114 [2023] PIERL 113 [2023] PIERL 112 [2023] PIERL 111 [2023] PIERL 110 [2023] PIERL 109 [2023] PIERL 108 [2023] PIERL 107 [2022] PIERL 106 [2022] PIERL 105 [2022] PIERL 104 [2022] PIERL 103 [2022] PIERL 102 [2022] PIERL 101 [2021] PIERL 100 [2021] PIERL 99 [2021] PIERL 98 [2021] PIERL 97 [2021] PIERL 96 [2021] PIERL 95 [2021] PIERL 94 [2020] PIERL 93 [2020] PIERL 92 [2020] PIERL 91 [2020] PIERL 90 [2020] PIERL 89 [2020] PIERL 88 [2020] PIERL 87 [2019] PIERL 86 [2019] PIERL 85 [2019] PIERL 84 [2019] PIERL 83 [2019] PIERL 82 [2019] PIERL 81 [2019] PIERL 80 [2018] PIERL 79 [2018] PIERL 78 [2018] PIERL 77 [2018] PIERL 76 [2018] PIERL 75 [2018] PIERL 74 [2018] PIERL 73 [2018] PIERL 72 [2018] PIERL 71 [2017] PIERL 70 [2017] PIERL 69 [2017] PIERL 68 [2017] PIERL 67 [2017] PIERL 66 [2017] PIERL 65 [2017] PIERL 64 [2016] PIERL 63 [2016] PIERL 62 [2016] PIERL 61 [2016] PIERL 60 [2016] PIERL 59 [2016] PIERL 58 [2016] PIERL 57 [2015] PIERL 56 [2015] PIERL 55 [2015] PIERL 54 [2015] PIERL 53 [2015] PIERL 52 [2015] PIERL 51 [2015] PIERL 50 [2014] PIERL 49 [2014] PIERL 48 [2014] PIERL 47 [2014] PIERL 46 [2014] PIERL 45 [2014] PIERL 44 [2014] PIERL 43 [2013] PIERL 42 [2013] PIERL 41 [2013] PIERL 40 [2013] PIERL 39 [2013] PIERL 38 [2013] PIERL 37 [2013] PIERL 36 [2013] PIERL 35 [2012] PIERL 34 [2012] PIERL 33 [2012] PIERL 32 [2012] PIERL 31 [2012] PIERL 30 [2012] PIERL 29 [2012] PIERL 28 [2012] PIERL 27 [2011] PIERL 26 [2011] PIERL 25 [2011] PIERL 24 [2011] PIERL 23 [2011] PIERL 22 [2011] PIERL 21 [2011] PIERL 20 [2011] PIERL 19 [2010] PIERL 18 [2010] PIERL 17 [2010] PIERL 16 [2010] PIERL 15 [2010] PIERL 14 [2010] PIERL 13 [2010] PIERL 12 [2009] PIERL 11 [2009] PIERL 10 [2009] PIERL 9 [2009] PIERL 8 [2009] PIERL 7 [2009] PIERL 6 [2009] PIERL 5 [2008] PIERL 4 [2008] PIERL 3 [2008] PIERL 2 [2008] PIERL 1 [2008]
2010-11-06
EMC Management: How to Compare Electromagnetic Environmental Measurements and Equipment Immunity Levels
By
Progress In Electromagnetics Research Letters, Vol. 18, 165-177, 2010
Abstract
The straightforward comparison between electromagnetic environment measurements and immunity levels for industrial, scientific, and medical equipment has been used in the technical literature as an ordinary method to provide electromagnetic compatibility management within critical areas, such as hospital and industrial environments. This paper addresses a theoretical discussion concerning emission and immunity test features to focus the aforementioned problem. Finally, a more reliable comparison method is proposed, the environmental compatibility level definition, using analytical analysis and measurement results.
Citation
Wilson Valente Junior, Matheus Hammes Amaral, and Adroaldo Raizer, "EMC Management: How to Compare Electromagnetic Environmental Measurements and Equipment Immunity Levels," Progress In Electromagnetics Research Letters, Vol. 18, 165-177, 2010.
doi:10.2528/PIERL10092011
References

1. Arnofsky, S., P. Doshi, K. Foster, D. Hanover, R. Mercado, D. Schleck, and M. Soltys, "Radiofrequency field surveys in hospitals," Proc. of IEEE 21st Annual Northeast Bioeng. Conf., 129-131, May 1995.

2. Bassen, H., P. Ruggera, J. Casamento, and D. Witters, "Sources of radiofrequency interference for medical devices in the non clinical environment," Proc. of the 16th Annual Int. Conf. of the IEEE EMBS, Vol. 2, 896-897, Nov. 1994.

3. Boyd, S. M., W. S. Boivin, J. N. Coletta, C. D. Harris, and L. M. Neunaber, "Documenting radiated electromagnetic field strength in the hospital environment," Journal of Clinical Eng., 124-132, Mar./Apr. 1999.

4. Davis, D., B. Segal, A. Cinquino, K. Hoege, R. Mastrocola, and T. Pavlasek, "Electromagnetic compatibility in hospital corridors," Proc. of IEEE Int. Symp. on Electromag. Compatibility, Vol. 1, 268-272, Aug. 1999.

5. Davis, D., B. Skulic, B. Segal, P. Vlach, and T. Pavlasek, "Hospital emergency room electromagnetic environment," Proc. of 19th International. Conf. IEEE/EMBS, Vol. 6, 2543-2546, Oct./Nov. 1997.

6. Phaiboon, S. and S. Somkuarnpanit, "Modeling and analysis the effect of radio-frequency fields in hospitals to the medical equipment," Proceedings of TENCON, Vol. 1, 92-95, Sep. 2000.

7. Schäfer, T., J. Maurer, J. Hagen, and W. Wiesbeck, "Experimental characterization of radio wave propagation in hospitals," IEEE Trans. on Electromagnetic Compatibility, Vol. 47, 304-311, May 2005.
doi:10.1109/TEMC.2005.847376

8. Vlach, P., B. Segal, and T. Pavlasek, "The measures & predicted electromagnetic environment at urban hospitals," Proc. of IEEE Int. Symposium on Electromagnetic Compatibility, 4-7, 1995.

9. Young, C., A. Saoudy, and S. Budwill, "EMI levels at a `patient care' location in a hospital," Proc. of IEEE CCECE, 625-628, 1997.

10. IEC 61000-4-3 Electromagnetic Compatibility (EMC) --- Part 4-3: Testing and Measurement Techniques-Radiated, Radio-frequency, Electromagnetic Field Immunity Test, 2.1 Ed., 107, Geneva, 2002.

11. ANSI Std. C63.2, , American National Standard for Electromagnetic Noise and Field Strength Instrumentation, 10 Hz to 40 GHz --- Specifications, Vol. 25, New York, 1996.

12. ISO/BIPM Guide to the Expression of Uncertainty in Measurements, 1 Ed., Geneva, 1993.