Vol. 94
Latest Volume
All Volumes
PIERM 127 [2024] PIERM 126 [2024] PIERM 125 [2024] PIERM 124 [2024] PIERM 123 [2024] PIERM 122 [2023] PIERM 121 [2023] PIERM 120 [2023] PIERM 119 [2023] PIERM 118 [2023] PIERM 117 [2023] PIERM 116 [2023] PIERM 115 [2023] PIERM 114 [2022] PIERM 113 [2022] PIERM 112 [2022] PIERM 111 [2022] PIERM 110 [2022] PIERM 109 [2022] PIERM 108 [2022] PIERM 107 [2022] PIERM 106 [2021] PIERM 105 [2021] PIERM 104 [2021] PIERM 103 [2021] PIERM 102 [2021] PIERM 101 [2021] PIERM 100 [2021] PIERM 99 [2021] PIERM 98 [2020] PIERM 97 [2020] PIERM 96 [2020] PIERM 95 [2020] PIERM 94 [2020] PIERM 93 [2020] PIERM 92 [2020] PIERM 91 [2020] PIERM 90 [2020] PIERM 89 [2020] PIERM 88 [2020] PIERM 87 [2019] PIERM 86 [2019] PIERM 85 [2019] PIERM 84 [2019] PIERM 83 [2019] PIERM 82 [2019] PIERM 81 [2019] PIERM 80 [2019] PIERM 79 [2019] PIERM 78 [2019] PIERM 77 [2019] PIERM 76 [2018] PIERM 75 [2018] PIERM 74 [2018] PIERM 73 [2018] PIERM 72 [2018] PIERM 71 [2018] PIERM 70 [2018] PIERM 69 [2018] PIERM 68 [2018] PIERM 67 [2018] PIERM 66 [2018] PIERM 65 [2018] PIERM 64 [2018] PIERM 63 [2018] PIERM 62 [2017] PIERM 61 [2017] PIERM 60 [2017] PIERM 59 [2017] PIERM 58 [2017] PIERM 57 [2017] PIERM 56 [2017] PIERM 55 [2017] PIERM 54 [2017] PIERM 53 [2017] PIERM 52 [2016] PIERM 51 [2016] PIERM 50 [2016] PIERM 49 [2016] PIERM 48 [2016] PIERM 47 [2016] PIERM 46 [2016] PIERM 45 [2016] PIERM 44 [2015] PIERM 43 [2015] PIERM 42 [2015] PIERM 41 [2015] PIERM 40 [2014] PIERM 39 [2014] PIERM 38 [2014] PIERM 37 [2014] PIERM 36 [2014] PIERM 35 [2014] PIERM 34 [2014] PIERM 33 [2013] PIERM 32 [2013] PIERM 31 [2013] PIERM 30 [2013] PIERM 29 [2013] PIERM 28 [2013] PIERM 27 [2012] PIERM 26 [2012] PIERM 25 [2012] PIERM 24 [2012] PIERM 23 [2012] PIERM 22 [2012] PIERM 21 [2011] PIERM 20 [2011] PIERM 19 [2011] PIERM 18 [2011] PIERM 17 [2011] PIERM 16 [2011] PIERM 14 [2010] PIERM 13 [2010] PIERM 12 [2010] PIERM 11 [2010] PIERM 10 [2009] PIERM 9 [2009] PIERM 8 [2009] PIERM 7 [2009] PIERM 6 [2009] PIERM 5 [2008] PIERM 4 [2008] PIERM 3 [2008] PIERM 2 [2008] PIERM 1 [2008]
2020-07-23
A Novel Compact Electromagnetic Band Gap Structure to Reduce the Mutual Coupling in Multilayer MIMO Antenna
By
Progress In Electromagnetics Research M, Vol. 94, 167-177, 2020
Abstract
This paper presents a novel compact multilayer meander strip line step-via electromagnetic band-gap (MLSV-EBG) structure with the application of mutual coupling reduction in a multilayer multiple input multiple output (MIMO) antenna. The proposed EBG-cell has been developed by using multilayer, novel meander strip line, and step-via concept. To analyse the proposed EBG a parallel LC model method is used. In the proposed MLSV-EBG structure, due to step-via concept, current path length increases, and compactness is achieved per unit cell. Parametric study is also presented. MLSV-EBG structure unit cell is simulated using ANSYS high frequency structure simulator (HFSS), and 5X5 cells are printed on an FR4 substrate for band-gap measurements. Simulated and measured results prove that compared with three-layer central located via EBG (CLV-EBG) and edge located via EBG (ELV-EBG), size reductions of 47.01% and 43.01% have been achieved, respectively, which shows that step via concept gives the significant size reduction per unit multilayer EBG cell. The application of proposed MLSV-EBG for the reduction of mutual coupling between two multilayer MIMO antennas is also demonstrated. The key contribution of the presented work is that the proposed compact multi-layer EBG structure is useful in a multi-layer environment at a lower frequency.
Citation
Kompella S. L. Parvathi, Sudha R. Gupta, and Pramod P. Bhavarthe, "A Novel Compact Electromagnetic Band Gap Structure to Reduce the Mutual Coupling in Multilayer MIMO Antenna," Progress In Electromagnetics Research M, Vol. 94, 167-177, 2020.
doi:10.2528/PIERM20051805
References

1. Yang, F. and Y. Rahmat-Samii, Electromagnetic Band Gap Structures in Antenna Engineering, Cambridge Univ. Press, Cambridge, U.K., 2009.

2. Sievenpiper, D., L. Zhang, R. F. J. Broas, N. G. Alexopolous, and E. Yablonovitch, "High impedance electromagnetic surfaces with a forbidden frequency band," IEEE Trans. Microw. Theory Tech., Vol. 47, No. 11, 2059-2074, 1999.

3. Yang, L., M. Fan, F. Chen, J. She, and Z. Feng, "A novel compact electromagnetic-bandgap (EBG) structure and its application for microwave circuits," IEEE Trans. Microw. Theory Tech., Vol. 53, No. 1, 183-190, 2005.

4. Rajo-Iglesias, E., L. Inclan-Sanchez, J.-L. Vazquez-Roy, and E. Garcia-Munoz, "Size reduction of Mushroom-type EBG surfaces by using edge-located vias," IEEE Microw. Wireless Compon. Lett., Vol. 17, No. 9, 670-672, 2007.

5. Cheng, H. R., Q. Song, Y.-C. Guo, X.-Q. Chen, and X.-W. Shi, "Design of a novel EBG structure and its application in fractal microstrip antenna," Progress In Electromagnetics Research C, Vol. 11, 81-90, 2009.

6. Han, Z.-J., W. Song, and X.-Q. Sheng, "Gain enhancement and RCS reduction for patch antenna by using polarization-dependent EBG surface," IEEE Antennas Wireless Propag. Lett., Vol. 16, 1631-1634, 2017.

7. Bhavarthe, P. P., S. S. Rathod, and K. T. V. Reddy, "A compact two via hammer spanner-type polarization-dependent electromagnetic-bandgap structure," IEEE Microw. Wireless Compon. Lett., Vol. 28, No. 4, 284-286, 2018.

8. Ghosh, S., T.-N. Tran, and T. Le-Ngoc, "Dual-layer EBG-based miniaturized multi-element antenna for MIMO systems," IEEE Trans. Antennas Propag., Vol. 62, No. 8, 3985-3997, 2014.

9. Zhang, S., "Novel dual-band compact HIS and its applications of reducing array in-band RCS," Microw. Opt. Technol. Lett., Vol. 58, No. 3, 700-704, 2016.

10. Yang, N., Z. N. Chen, Y. Y. Wang, and M. Y. W. Chia, "A two-layer compact electromagnetic bandgap (EBG) structure and its applications in microstrip filter design," Microw. Opt. Technol. Lett., Vol. 37, No. 1, 62-64, 2003.

11. Bantavis, P., M. Le Roy, A. Perennec, R. Lababidi, and D. Le Jeune, "Miniaturized wide- and dual-band multilayer electromagnetic bandgap for antenna isolation and on-package/PCB noise suppression," IEEE 22nd Workshop on Signal and Power Integrity (SPI), 1-4, Brest, France, 2018.

12. Wang, C.-D. and T.-L. Wu, "Model and mechanism of miniaturized and stop band-enhanced interleaved EBG structure for power/ground noise suppression," IEEE Trans. Electromagn. Compat., Vol. 55, No. 1, 159-167, 2013.

13. Veeramani, A., A. S. Arezomand, J. Vijayakrishnan, and F. B. Zarrabi, "Compact S-shaped EBG structures for reduction of mutual coupling," IEEE Fifth International Conference on Advanced Computing Communication Technologies, 21-25, Haryana, India, 2015.

14. Jiang, T., T. Jiao, and Y. Li, "A low mutual coupling MIMO antenna using periodic multi-layered electromagnetic band gap structures," Appl. Comput. Electromagn. Soc. J., Vol. 33, No. 3, 305-311, 2018.

15. Azarbar, A. and J. Ghalibafan, "A compact low-permittivity dual-layer EBG structure for mutual coupling reduction," International Journal of Antennas and Propagation, Vol. 2011, 1-6, 2011.

16. Nadeem, I. and D.-Y. Choi, "Study on mutual coupling reduction technique for MIMO antennas," IEEE Access, Vol. 7, 563-586, 2018.

17. Remski, R., "Analysis of photonic bandgap surfaces using Ansoft HFSS," Microwave Journal, Vol. 43, No. 9, 190-199, 2000.

18. Pozar, D., "Input impedance and mutual coupling of rectangular microstrip antennas," IEEE Trans. Antennas Propag., Vol. 30, No. 6, 1191-1196, 1982.

19. Pozar, D. and D. Schaubert, "Analysis of an infinite array of rectangular microstrip patches with idealized probe feeds," IEEE Trans. Antennas Propag., Vol. 32, No. 10, 1101-1107, 1984.

20. Steyskal, H. and J. S. Herd, "Mutual coupling compensation in small array antennas," IEEE Trans. Antennas Propag., Vol. 38, No. 12, 1971-1975, 1990.

21. Bhavarthe, P. P., S. S. Rathod, and K. T. V. Reddy, "Mutual coupling reduction in patch antenna using electromagnetic band gap (EBG) structure for IoT application," Proc. IEEE International Conference on Communication Information and Computing Technology (ICCICT), 1-4, Mumbai, India, 2018.

22. Yang, F. and Y. Rahmat-Samii, "Microstrip antennas integrated with electromagnetic band-gap (EBG) structures: A low mutual coupling design for array applications," IEEE Trans. Antennas Propag., Vol. 51, No. 10, 2936-2946, 2003.

23. Bhavarthe, P. P., S. S. Rathod, and K. T. V. Reddy, "A compact dual band gap electromagnetic band gap structure," IEEE Trans. Antennas Propag., Vol. 67, No. 1, 596-600, 2019.

24. Park, J. D., M. U. Rahman, and H. N. Chen, "Isolation enhancement of wide-band MIMO array antennas utilizing resistive loading," IEEE Access, Vol. 7, 81020-81026, 2019.

25. Rahman, M. U., D. S. Ko, and J. D. Park, "A compact multiple notched ultra-wide band antenna with an analysis of the CSRR-TO-CSRR coupling for portable UWB applications," Sensors, Vol. 17, No. 10, 1-13, 2017.

26. Rahman, M. U., M. N. Jahromi, S. S. Mirjavadi, and A. M. Hamouda, "Bandwidth enhancement and frequency scanning array antenna using novel UWB filter integration technique for OFDM UWB radar applications in wireless vital signs monitoring," Sensors (Basel), Vol. 18, No. 9, 1-14, 2018.

27. Rahman, M. U., M. N. Jahromi, S. S. Mirjavadi, and A. M. Hamouda, "Compact UWB band-notched antenna with integrated bluetooth for personal wireless communication and UWB applications," Electronics, Vol. 8, No. 2, 1-14, 2019.

28. Blanch, S., J. Romeu, and I. Corbella, "Exact representation of antenna system diversity performance from input parameter description," Electron. Lett., Vol. 39, No. 9, 705-707, 2003.

29. Suntives, A. and R. Abhari, "Miniaturization and isolation improvement of a multiple-patch antenna system using electromagnetic bandgap structures," Microw. Opt. Technol. Lett., Vol. 55, No. 7, 1609-1612, 2013.

30. Yu, A. and X. Zhang, "A novel method to improve the performance of microstrip antenna arrays using a dumbbell EBG structure," IEEE Antennas Wireless Propag. Lett., Vol. 2, 170-172, 2003.

31. Maddio, S., G. Pelosi, M. Righini, S. Selleri, and I. Vecchi, "Mutual coupling reduction inmultilayer patch antennas via meander line parasites," Electron. Lett., Vol. 54, No. 15, 922-924, 2018.

32. Farahani, H. S., M. Veysi, M. Kamyab, and A. Tadjalli, "Mutual coupling reduction in patch antenna arrays using a UC-EBG superstrate," IEEE Antennas Wireless Propag. Lett., Vol. 9, 57-59, 2010.

33. Xu, H. X., G. M. Wang, and M. Q. Qi, "Hilbert-shaped magnetic waveguided metamaterials for electromagnetic coupling reduction of microstrip antenna array," IEEE Trans. Magn., Vol. 49, No. 4, 1526-1529, 2013.

34. Zheng, Q. R., Y. Q. Fu, and N. Yuan, "A novel compact spiral electromagnetic band gap (EBG) structures," IEEE Trans. Antennas Propag., Vol. 56, No. 6, 1656-1660, 2008.