volume | PIER Journals

Abstract

The zeroing of second order correlation functions between output fields after interferences in a 50/50 beam splitter has been accepted decades-long in the quantum optics community as an indicator of the quantum nature of lights. But, a recent work [1] presented some notable discussions and experiments that classical electromagnetic fields can still exhibit the zero correlation under specific conditions. Here, we examine analytically classical and quantum electromagnetic field interferences in a 50/50 beam splitter in the context of the second order correlation function for various input conditions. Adopting the Heisenberg picture in quantum electromagnetics, we examine components of four-term interference terms in the numerator of second order correlation functions and elucidate their physical significance. As such, we reveal the fundamental difference between the classical and quantum interference as illustrated by the Hong-Ou-Mandel (HOM) effect. The quantum HOM effect is strongly associated with: (1) the commutator relation that does not have a classical analogue; (2) the property of Fock states needed to stipulate the one-photon quantum state of the system; and (3) a destructive wave interference effect. Here, (1) and (2) imply the indivisibility of a photon. On the contrary, the classical HOM effect requires the presence of two destructive wave interferences without the need to stipulate a quantum state.

1. Sadana, S., D. Ghosh, K. Joarder, A. N. Lakshmi, B. C. Sanders, and U. Sinha, "Near-100% two-photon-like coincidence-visibility dip with classical light and the role of complementarity," Phys. Rev. A, Vol. 100, 013839, 2019.
doi:10.1103/PhysRevA.100.013839 Google Scholar

2. Wikipedia, , Newton’s rings, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Newton's_rings.

3. Phase-locked loop, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Phase-locked_loop.

4. Goodman, J. W., Statistical Optics, Wiley-Interscience, 1985.

5. Loudon, R., "The Quantum Theory of Light," OUP Oxford, 2000. Google Scholar

6. Mandel, L. and E. Wolf, Optical Coherence and Quantum Optics, Cambridge University Press, 1995.
doi:10.1017/CBO9781139644105

7. Gerry, C. and P. Knight, Introductory Quantum Optics, Cambridge University Press, 2004.
doi:10.1017/CBO9780511791239

8. Fox, M., Quantum Optics: An Introduction, Vol. 15, OUP Oxford, 2006.

9. Hanbury Brown, R. and R. Q. Twiss, "Correlation between photons in two coherent beams of light," Nature, Vol. 177, No. 4497, 27-29, 1956.
doi:10.1038/177027a0 Google Scholar

10. Hong, C. K., Z. Y. Ou, and L. Mandel, "Measurement of subpicosecond time intervals between two photons by interference," Phys. Rev. Lett., Vol. 59, 2044-2046, Nov. 1987. Google Scholar

11. Fearn, H. and R. Loudon, "Quantum theory of the lossless beam splitter," Optics Communications, Vol. 64, 485-490, 1987.
doi:10.1016/0030-4018(87)90275-6 Google Scholar

12. Kaltenbaek, R., B. Blauensteiner, M. Zukowski, M. Aspelmeyer, and A. Zeilinger, "Experimental interference of independent photons," Phys. Rev. Lett., Vol. 96, 240502, Jun. 2006.
doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.96.240502 Google Scholar

13. Prasad, S., M. O. Scully, and W. Martienssen, "A quantum description of the beam splitter," Optics Communications, Vol. 62, No. 3, 139-145, 1987.
doi:10.1016/0030-4018(87)90015-0 Google Scholar

14. Ou, Z. Y., "Quantum theory of fourth-order interference," Phys. Rev. A, Vol. 37, 1607-1619, 1988.
doi:10.1103/PhysRevA.37.1607 Google Scholar

15. Ham, B. S., "The origin of anticorrelation for photon bunching on a beam splitter," Scientific Reports, Vol. 10, 7309, 2020.
doi:10.1038/s41598-020-64441-2 Google Scholar

16. Branczyk, A. M., "Hong-Ou-Mandel interference,", arXiv:1711.00080, 2017. Google Scholar

17. Di Martino, G., Y. Sonnefraud, M. S. Tame, S. Kena-Cohen, F. Dieleman, K. Ozdemir, M. S. Kim, and S. A. Maier, "Observation of quantum interference in the plasmonic Hong-Ou-Mandel effect," Phys. Rev. Applied, Vol. 1, 034004, 2014.
doi:10.1103/PhysRevApplied.1.034004 Google Scholar

18. Longo, P., J. H. Cole, and K. Busch, "The Hong-Ou-Mandel effect in the context of few-photon scattering," Opt. Express, Vol. 20, 12 326-12 340, 2012.
doi:10.1364/OE.20.012326 Google Scholar

19. Lang, C., C. Eichler, L. Steffen, J. M. Fink, M. J. Woolley, A. Blais, and A. Wallraff, "Correlations, indistinguishability and entanglement in Hong-Ou-Mandel experiments at microwave frequencies," Nature Physics, Vol. 9, 345-348, 2013.
doi:10.1038/nphys2612 Google Scholar

20. Lopes, R., A. Imanaliev, A. Aspect, M. Cheneau, D. Boiron, and C. I. Westbrook, "Atomic Hong-Ou-Mandel experiment," Nature, Vol. 520, 66-68, 2015.
doi:10.1038/nature14331 Google Scholar

21. Kobayashi, T., R. Ikuta, S. Yasui, S. Miki, T. Yamashita, H. Terai, T. Yamamoto, M. Koashi, and N. Imoto, "Frequency-domain Hong-Ou-Mandel interference," Nature Photonics, Vol. 10, 441-444, 2016.
doi:10.1038/nphoton.2016.74 Google Scholar

22. Imany, P., O. D. Odele, M. S. Alshaykh, H.-H. Lu, D. E. Leaird, and A. M. Weiner, "Frequency-domain Hong-Ou-Mandel interference with linear optics," Opt. Lett., Vol. 43, No. 12, 2760-2763, 2018.
doi:10.1364/OL.43.002760 Google Scholar

23. Rohde, P. P. and T. C. Ralph, "Frequency and temporal effects in linear optical quantum computing," Phys. Rev. A, Vol. 71, 032320, 2005.
doi:10.1103/PhysRevA.71.032320 Google Scholar

24. Rohde, P. P., T. C. Ralph, and M. A. Nielsen, "Optimal photons for quantum-information processing," Phys. Rev. A, Vol. 72, 052332, 2005.
doi:10.1103/PhysRevA.72.052332 Google Scholar

25. Mahrlein, S., S. Oppel, R. Wiegner, and J. von Zanthier, "Hong-Ou-Mandel interference without beam splitters," Journal of Modern Optics, Vol. 64, 921-929, 2017.
doi:10.1080/09500340.2016.1242790 Google Scholar

26. Kim, M. S., W. Son, V. Buzek, and P. L. Knight, "Entanglement by a beam splitter: Nonclassicality as a prerequisite for entanglement," Phys. Rev. A, Vol. 65, 032323, 2002.
doi:10.1103/PhysRevA.65.032323 Google Scholar

27. Walschaers, M., "Signatures of many-particle interference," Journal of Physics B: Atomic, Molecular and Optical Physics, Vol. 53, 043001, 2020.
doi:10.1088/1361-6455/ab5c30 Google Scholar

28. Deng, Y.-H., H. Wang, X. Ding, Z.-C. Duan, J. Qin, M.-C. Chen, Y. He, Y.-M. He, J.-P. Li, Y.- H. Li, L.-C. Peng, E. S. Matekole, T. Byrnes, C. Schneider, M. Kamp, D.-W. Wang, J. P. Dowling, S. Hofling, C.-Y. Lu, M. O. Scully, and J.-W. Pan, "Quantum interference between light sources separated by 150 million kilometers," Phys. Rev. Lett., Vol. 123, 080401, 2019.
doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.123.080401 Google Scholar

29. Chew, W. C., Waves and Fields in Inhomogeneous Media, Van Nostrand, 1990.

30. Electromagnetic field theory, Lecture Notes for ECE 604 at Purdue U, 2020, https://engineering.purdue.edu/wcchew/ece604s20/EMFTAll.pdf.

31. Na, D.-Y., J. Zhu, F. L. Teixeira, and W. C. Chew, "Quantum information propagation preserving computational electromagnetics,", arXiv preprint arXiv:1911.00947, 2019. Google Scholar

32. Na, D.-Y., J. Zhu, W. C. Chew, and F. L. Teixeira, "Quantum information preserving computational electromagnetics," Phys. Rev. A, Vol. 102, No. 1, 013711, Jul. 2020.
doi:10.1103/PhysRevA.102.013711 Google Scholar

33. Chew, W. C., A. Y. Liu, C. Salazar-Lazaro, and W. E. I. Sha, "Quantum electromagnetics: A new look — Part I and Part II," J. Multiscale and Multiphys. Comput. Techn., Vol. 1, 73-97, 2016.
doi:10.1109/JMMCT.2016.2617018 Google Scholar

34. Kirk, D. E., Optimal Control Theory: An Introduction, Courier Corporation, 2004.

35. Schrodinger, E., "An undulatory theory of the mechanics of atoms and molecules," Phys. Rev., Vol. 28, No. 6, 1049, 1926.
doi:10.1103/PhysRev.28.1049 Google Scholar

36. Chew, W., A. Liu, C. Salazar-Lazaro, D.-Y. Na, and W. Sha, "Hamilton equations, commutator, and energy conservation," Quantum Reports, Vol. 1, 295-303, 2019.
doi:10.3390/quantum1020027 Google Scholar

37. Louisell, W. H. and W. H. Louisell, Quantum Statistical Properties of Radiation, Vol. 7, Wiley, 1973.

38. Haken, H., Quantum Field Theory of Solids, an Introduction, North-Holland, 1976.

39. Cohen-Tannoudji, C., J. Dupont-Roc, and G. Grynberg, Atom-Photon Interactions: Basic Processes and Applications, Wiley-VCH, 1988.

40. Vogel, W. and D.-G. Welsch, "Quantum Optics," John Wiley & Sons, 2006. Google Scholar

41. Walls, D. F. and G. J. Milburn, Quantum Optics, Springer Science & Business Media, 2007.

42. Scheel, S. and S. Y. Buhmann, "Macroscopic quantum electrodynamics," Acta Physica Slovaca, Vol. 58, 675-809, 2008. Google Scholar

43. Garrison, J. and R. Chiao, Quantum Optics, Oxford University Press, 2008.
doi:10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198508861.001.0001

44. Gottfried, K. and T.-M. Yan, Quantum Mechanics: Fundamentals, CRC Press, 2018.
doi:10.4324/9780429493225

45. Milonni, P., An Introduction to Quantum Optics and Quantum Fluctuations, Oxford University Press, 2019.
doi:10.1093/oso/9780199215614.001.0001

46. Miller, D. A., Quantum Mechanics for Scientists and Engineers, Cambridge University Press, 2008.
doi:10.1017/CBO9780511813962

47. Chew, W. C., "Quantum mechanics made simple: Lecture notes for ECE 487 at UIUC,", 2016, http://wcchew.ece.illinois.edu/chew/course/QMAll20161206.pdf. Google Scholar

48. Gerry, C. C. and K. M. Bruno, The Quantum Divide: Why Schrodinger's Cat is Either Dead or Alive, Oxford University Press, 2013.
doi:10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199666560.001.0001

49. Glauber, R. J., "The quantum theory of optical coherence," Phys. Rev., Vol. 130, 2529-2539, 1963.
doi:10.1103/PhysRev.130.2529 Google Scholar

Dr. Dong-Yeop Na

Professor Weng Cho Chew