Vol. 97
Latest Volume
All Volumes
PIERB 106 [2024] PIERB 105 [2024] PIERB 104 [2024] PIERB 103 [2023] PIERB 102 [2023] PIERB 101 [2023] PIERB 100 [2023] PIERB 99 [2023] PIERB 98 [2023] PIERB 97 [2022] PIERB 96 [2022] PIERB 95 [2022] PIERB 94 [2021] PIERB 93 [2021] PIERB 92 [2021] PIERB 91 [2021] PIERB 90 [2021] PIERB 89 [2020] PIERB 88 [2020] PIERB 87 [2020] PIERB 86 [2020] PIERB 85 [2019] PIERB 84 [2019] PIERB 83 [2019] PIERB 82 [2018] PIERB 81 [2018] PIERB 80 [2018] PIERB 79 [2017] PIERB 78 [2017] PIERB 77 [2017] PIERB 76 [2017] PIERB 75 [2017] PIERB 74 [2017] PIERB 73 [2017] PIERB 72 [2017] PIERB 71 [2016] PIERB 70 [2016] PIERB 69 [2016] PIERB 68 [2016] PIERB 67 [2016] PIERB 66 [2016] PIERB 65 [2016] PIERB 64 [2015] PIERB 63 [2015] PIERB 62 [2015] PIERB 61 [2014] PIERB 60 [2014] PIERB 59 [2014] PIERB 58 [2014] PIERB 57 [2014] PIERB 56 [2013] PIERB 55 [2013] PIERB 54 [2013] PIERB 53 [2013] PIERB 52 [2013] PIERB 51 [2013] PIERB 50 [2013] PIERB 49 [2013] PIERB 48 [2013] PIERB 47 [2013] PIERB 46 [2013] PIERB 45 [2012] PIERB 44 [2012] PIERB 43 [2012] PIERB 42 [2012] PIERB 41 [2012] PIERB 40 [2012] PIERB 39 [2012] PIERB 38 [2012] PIERB 37 [2012] PIERB 36 [2012] PIERB 35 [2011] PIERB 34 [2011] PIERB 33 [2011] PIERB 32 [2011] PIERB 31 [2011] PIERB 30 [2011] PIERB 29 [2011] PIERB 28 [2011] PIERB 27 [2011] PIERB 26 [2010] PIERB 25 [2010] PIERB 24 [2010] PIERB 23 [2010] PIERB 22 [2010] PIERB 21 [2010] PIERB 20 [2010] PIERB 19 [2010] PIERB 18 [2009] PIERB 17 [2009] PIERB 16 [2009] PIERB 15 [2009] PIERB 14 [2009] PIERB 13 [2009] PIERB 12 [2009] PIERB 11 [2009] PIERB 10 [2008] PIERB 9 [2008] PIERB 8 [2008] PIERB 7 [2008] PIERB 6 [2008] PIERB 5 [2008] PIERB 4 [2008] PIERB 3 [2008] PIERB 2 [2008] PIERB 1 [2008]
2022-10-26
Electromagnetic Simulation for Robust Recognition Algorithm of Radar Target by Homing Missiles
By
Progress In Electromagnetics Research B, Vol. 97, 37-54, 2022
Abstract
A novel signal processing scheme for identification of jet fighter targets by the onboard radar of active and hybrid homing missiles is proposed in the present work. For a specific target, the frequencies of the internal resonances of the cavity-backed apertures existing as the air-inlet pipes of the jet engine are used to construct an interior signature function for the proposed target identification scheme. For the purpose of quantitative description and assessment of the proposed scheme, electromagnetic simulation is used where the air-inlet pipe is modeled as an open-ended conducting cylinder with a number of radial conducting blades placed inside the cylindrical cavity near the open end. The transmitted radar pulse is formed by frequency chirping using linear frequency modulation (LFM) to include the frequencies in the band 1.0--2.0\,GHz with high sweep resolution. The selected frequency band is wide enough to distinguish among various jet fighter targets. The CST® simulator is used to evaluate the radar cross section (RCS) of the open-ended pipe model with the internal blades due to an incident chirped pulsed plane wave as mentioned above over the frequency band 1.0-2.0 GHz. The proposed target identification algorithm is mathematically described and computationally applied to identify different targets with different dimensions of the jet engine pipe. The effect of the additive white Gaussian noise (AWGN) on the correctness of the target identification decision using the proposed scheme is investigated by calculating the false alarm rate (FAR) with varying the signal-to-noise ratio (SNR). The numerical examinations show that the proposed algorithm succeeds in taking the correct decision regarding the target identification with FAR<10% for SNR} ≥ 12 dB.
Citation
Alaa G. A. Abd-Elfattah, Khalid Fawzy Ahmed Hussein, Asmaa Elsayed Farahat, and Magdy A. Kotb, "Electromagnetic Simulation for Robust Recognition Algorithm of Radar Target by Homing Missiles," Progress In Electromagnetics Research B, Vol. 97, 37-54, 2022.
doi:10.2528/PIERB22091508
References

1. Hussein, K. F. A., "Effect of internal resonance on the radar cross section and shield effectiveness of open spherical enclosures," Progress In Electromagnetics Research, Vol. 70, 225-246, 2007.
doi:10.2528/PIER07012101

2. Anastassiu, H. T., J. L. Volakis, D. C. Ross, and D. Andersh, "Electromagnetic scattering from simple jet engine models," IEEE Transactions on Antennas and Propagation, Vol. 44, No. 3, 420-421, 1996.
doi:10.1109/8.486313

3. Moffatt, D. L., C. Y. Lai, and T. Lee, "Time-domain electromagnetic scattering by open ended circular waveguide and related structure," Wave Motion, Vol. 6, No. 4, 363-387, 1984.
doi:10.1016/0165-2125(84)90039-8

4. Galyamin, S. N., "Cherenkov wakefield radiation from an open end of a three-layer dielectric capillary," arXiv preprint arXiv:2205.03986, 2022.

5. Davis, A. M. J. and R. W. Scharstein, "Electromagnetic plane wave excitation of an open-ended, finite-length conducting cylinder," Journal of Electromagnetic Waves and Applications, Vol. 7, No. 2, 301-319, 1993.
doi:10.1163/156939393X00354

6. Zhou, Z. and J. Huang, "Study of the radar cross-section of turbofan engine with biaxial multirotor based on dynamic scattering method," Energies, Vol. 13, No. 21, 5802, 2020.
doi:10.3390/en13215802

7. Sun, X., "Influence evaluation of UAV inlet on electromagnetic scattering and time-frequency characteristics," Journal of Physics: Conference Series, Vol. 1971, No. 1, 012019, IOP Publishing, 2021.
doi:10.1088/1742-6596/1971/1/012019

8. Siouris, G. M., Missile Guidance and Control Systems, Springer-Verlag, New York, NY, USA, 2010.

9. Hussein, K. F. A., A. O. Helmy, and A. S. Mohra, "Radar pulse compression with optimized weighting window for SAR receivers," Wireless Personal Communications, Vol. 126, No. 1, 871-893, Sep. 2022.
doi:10.1007/s11277-022-09774-z