Vol. 148
Latest Volume
All Volumes
PIER 180 [2024] PIER 179 [2024] PIER 178 [2023] PIER 177 [2023] PIER 176 [2023] PIER 175 [2022] PIER 174 [2022] PIER 173 [2022] PIER 172 [2021] PIER 171 [2021] PIER 170 [2021] PIER 169 [2020] PIER 168 [2020] PIER 167 [2020] PIER 166 [2019] PIER 165 [2019] PIER 164 [2019] PIER 163 [2018] PIER 162 [2018] PIER 161 [2018] PIER 160 [2017] PIER 159 [2017] PIER 158 [2017] PIER 157 [2016] PIER 156 [2016] PIER 155 [2016] PIER 154 [2015] PIER 153 [2015] PIER 152 [2015] PIER 151 [2015] PIER 150 [2015] PIER 149 [2014] PIER 148 [2014] PIER 147 [2014] PIER 146 [2014] PIER 145 [2014] PIER 144 [2014] PIER 143 [2013] PIER 142 [2013] PIER 141 [2013] PIER 140 [2013] PIER 139 [2013] PIER 138 [2013] PIER 137 [2013] PIER 136 [2013] PIER 135 [2013] PIER 134 [2013] PIER 133 [2013] PIER 132 [2012] PIER 131 [2012] PIER 130 [2012] PIER 129 [2012] PIER 128 [2012] PIER 127 [2012] PIER 126 [2012] PIER 125 [2012] PIER 124 [2012] PIER 123 [2012] PIER 122 [2012] PIER 121 [2011] PIER 120 [2011] PIER 119 [2011] PIER 118 [2011] PIER 117 [2011] PIER 116 [2011] PIER 115 [2011] PIER 114 [2011] PIER 113 [2011] PIER 112 [2011] PIER 111 [2011] PIER 110 [2010] PIER 109 [2010] PIER 108 [2010] PIER 107 [2010] PIER 106 [2010] PIER 105 [2010] PIER 104 [2010] PIER 103 [2010] PIER 102 [2010] PIER 101 [2010] PIER 100 [2010] PIER 99 [2009] PIER 98 [2009] PIER 97 [2009] PIER 96 [2009] PIER 95 [2009] PIER 94 [2009] PIER 93 [2009] PIER 92 [2009] PIER 91 [2009] PIER 90 [2009] PIER 89 [2009] PIER 88 [2008] PIER 87 [2008] PIER 86 [2008] PIER 85 [2008] PIER 84 [2008] PIER 83 [2008] PIER 82 [2008] PIER 81 [2008] PIER 80 [2008] PIER 79 [2008] PIER 78 [2008] PIER 77 [2007] PIER 76 [2007] PIER 75 [2007] PIER 74 [2007] PIER 73 [2007] PIER 72 [2007] PIER 71 [2007] PIER 70 [2007] PIER 69 [2007] PIER 68 [2007] PIER 67 [2007] PIER 66 [2006] PIER 65 [2006] PIER 64 [2006] PIER 63 [2006] PIER 62 [2006] PIER 61 [2006] PIER 60 [2006] PIER 59 [2006] PIER 58 [2006] PIER 57 [2006] PIER 56 [2006] PIER 55 [2005] PIER 54 [2005] PIER 53 [2005] PIER 52 [2005] PIER 51 [2005] PIER 50 [2005] PIER 49 [2004] PIER 48 [2004] PIER 47 [2004] PIER 46 [2004] PIER 45 [2004] PIER 44 [2004] PIER 43 [2003] PIER 42 [2003] PIER 41 [2003] PIER 40 [2003] PIER 39 [2003] PIER 38 [2002] PIER 37 [2002] PIER 36 [2002] PIER 35 [2002] PIER 34 [2001] PIER 33 [2001] PIER 32 [2001] PIER 31 [2001] PIER 30 [2001] PIER 29 [2000] PIER 28 [2000] PIER 27 [2000] PIER 26 [2000] PIER 25 [2000] PIER 24 [1999] PIER 23 [1999] PIER 22 [1999] PIER 21 [1999] PIER 20 [1998] PIER 19 [1998] PIER 18 [1998] PIER 17 [1997] PIER 16 [1997] PIER 15 [1997] PIER 14 [1996] PIER 13 [1996] PIER 12 [1996] PIER 11 [1995] PIER 10 [1995] PIER 09 [1994] PIER 08 [1994] PIER 07 [1993] PIER 06 [1992] PIER 05 [1991] PIER 04 [1991] PIER 03 [1990] PIER 02 [1990] PIER 01 [1989]
2014-08-20
A Differential DPSM Based Modeling Applied to Eddy Current Imaging Problems
By
Progress In Electromagnetics Research, Vol. 148, 209-221, 2014
Abstract
This paper deals with an innovative implementation of a semi-analytical modeling method, called the Distributed Points Source Method (DPSM), in the case of an eddy current problem. The DPSM has already shown great potentialities for the versatile and computationally efficient modeling of complex electrostatic, electromagnetic or ultrasonic problems. In this paper, we report a new implementation of the DPSM, called differential DPSM, which shows interesting prospects for the modeling of complex eddy current problems such as met in the non-destructive imaging of metallic parts. In this paper, the used eddy current imaging device is firstly presented. It is composed of an eddy current (EC) inducer and a magneto optical set-up used to translate the magnetic field distribution appearing at the surface of the imaged part, into a recordable optical image. In this study, the device is implemented for the time-harmonics (900 Hz) imaging of a two-layer aluminum based assembly, featuring surface-breaking and buried defects. Then, the basics of the time-harmonics DPSM modeling are recalled, and the differential approach is presented. It is implemented for the modeling of the interactions of the eddy current imaging device with the considered flawed assembly in the same operating conditions as the experimental implementation. The comparison between experimental and computed data obtained for millimetric surface and buried defects is presented in the form of complex magnetic cartographies and Lissajous plots. The obtained results show good agreement and open the way to the modeling of complex EC problems. Furthermore, the low computational complexity of the differential DPSM modelings makes it promising to consider for the solving of EC inverse problems.
Citation
Thierry Bore, Pierre-Yves Joubert, and Dominique Placko, "A Differential DPSM Based Modeling Applied to Eddy Current Imaging Problems," Progress In Electromagnetics Research, Vol. 148, 209-221, 2014.
doi:10.2528/PIER14032405
References

1. Udpa, S. and P. Moore, Nondestructive Testing Handbook, 3rd Ed., Vol. 5, Electromagnetic Testing, American Nondestructive Testing Society, 2004.

2. Cacciola, M., F. C. Morabito, D. Polimeni, and M. Versaci, "Fuzzy characterization of flawed metallic plates with eddy current tests," Progress In Electromagnetics Research, Vol. 72, 241-252, 2007.
doi:10.2528/PIER07031301

3. Libby, H. L., Introduction to Electromagnetic Nondestructive Test Methods, Robert Kriegger Publisher Company, 1979.

4. Yusa, N., H. Huang, and K. Miya, "Numerical evaluation of the ill-posedness of eddy current problems to size real cracks," NDT and E Int., No. 40, 185-191, 2007.
doi:10.1016/j.ndteint.2006.10.012

5. Premel, D. and A. Baussard, "Eddy current evaluation of 3D flaws in flat conductive materials using a Bayesian approach," Inv. Problems, 1873-1889, 2002.
doi:10.1088/0266-5611/18/6/326

6. Ida, N., Numerical Modeling for Electromagnetic Non Destructive Evaluation, Chapman & Hall, 1995.

7. Dodd, C. V. and W. E. Deeds, "Analytical solutions to eddy-current probe-coil problems," J. Appl. Phys., Vol. 39, 2829, 1968.
doi:10.1063/1.1656680

8. Uzal, E., J. C. Moulder, S. Mitra, and J. H. Rose, "Impedance of coil over layered metals with continuously variable conductivity and permeability, theory and experiment, probe-coil problems," J. Appl. Phys., No. 74, 2076, 1970.

9. Mukerji, S. K., M. George, M. B. Ramamurthy, and K. Asaduzzaman, "Eddy currents in laminated rectangular cores," Progress In Electromagnetics Research, Vol. 83, 435-445, 2008.
doi:10.2528/PIER08062101

10. Burke, S. K., "Impedance of a horizontal coil above a conducting half space," Journal of Physics D: Applied Physics, Vol. 19, 1159-1173, 1986.
doi:10.1088/0022-3727/19/7/006

11. Le Bihan, Y., "Study on the transformer equivalent circuit of eddy current nondestructive evaluation," NDT and E Int., Vol. 36, No. 5, 297-302, Jul. 1 2003.
doi:10.1016/S0963-8695(03)00003-3

12. Le Diraison, Y., Imagerie a courants de Foucault pour l’evaluation non-destructive de structures rivetees aeronautiques, Ph.D. Thesis, ´Ecole normale superieure de Cachan-ENS Cachan, 2008.

13. Le Diraison, Y., P.-Y. Joubert, and J. Pinassaud, "3D finite element modeling of an eddy current imager," 7th International Symposium on Electric And Magnetic Fields, 99-100, 2006.

14. Bowler, J. R., "Eddy current calculations using half-space Green’s functions," J. Appl. Phys., Vol. 61, 833-839, 1987.
doi:10.1063/1.338131

15. Dodd, C. V. and W. E. Deed, "Integral solutions to some eddy current problems," International Journal of Non Destructive Testing, Vol. 1, 29-90, 1969.

16. Albanese, R., G. Rubinacci, and F. Villone, "An integral computation model for crack simulation and detection via eddy currents," J. Comput. Phys., Vol. 152, 736-755, 1999.
doi:10.1006/jcph.1999.6261

17. Rubinacci, G., A. Tamburrino, S. Ventre, F. Villone, L. Udpa, L. Xuan, and Z. Zeng, "Numerical simulation of magneto-optic eddy current imaging," Electromagnetic Nondestructive Evaluation (VII), 180-188, 2006.

18. Premel, D. and P. Baussard, "Eddy current evaluation of 3D flaws in flat conductive materials using a Bayesian approach," Inv. Problems, 1873-1889, 2002.
doi:10.1088/0266-5611/18/6/326

19. Rubinacci, G., A. Tamburrino, S. Ventre, P.-Y. Joubert, and J. Pinassaud, "Numerical modeling of phase sensitive eddy current imaging system," Studies in Applied Electromagnetics and Mechanics, Electromagnetic Non-destructive Evaluation (X), Vol. 28, 28-33, 2007.

20. Paillard, S., G. Pichenot, Y. Choua, Y. Le Bihan, M. Lambert, H. Voillaume, and N. Dominguez, "Modelling of flawed riveted structures for EC inspection in aeronautics," Studies in Applied Electromagnetics and Mechanics, Electromagnetic Nondestrucitve Evaluation (XI), Vol. 31, 217-224, IOS Press, 2008.

21. Placko, D., T. Kundu, N. Liebaux, and A. Cruau, Procede universel de modelisation des interactions entre au moins une onde et au moins un objet, la surface de chaque objet definissant une interface entre au moins deux milieux, French patent No. FR2895544B1, Dec. 23, 2005; Patent Application Canada No. CA2634903A1, Dec. 20, 2006; Patent Application Japon No. JP2008546450A1, Dec. 20, 2006; Patent Application USA No. US2010-0010781A1, Dec. 20, 2006.

22. Placko, D. and T. Kundu, DPSM for Modeling Engineering Problems, John Wiley & Sons, Inc., 2007.
doi:10.1002/9780470142400

23. Bore, T., D. Placko, F. Taillade, and M. Himbert, "Capacitive sensor for measuring the filled of post-tensioned ducts. Experimental set-up, modelling and signal processing," IEEE Sensors Journal, Vol. 13, 457-465, 2013.
doi:10.1109/JSEN.2012.2219392

24. Bore, T., D. Placko, F. Taillade, and P. Sabouroux, "Electromagnetic characterization of grouting materials of bridge post tensioned ducts for NDT using capacitive probe," NDT and E Int., Vol. 60, 110-120, 2013.
doi:10.1016/j.ndteint.2013.07.010

25. Placko, D. and T. Kundu, Ultrasonic nondestructive evaluation: Engineering and biological material characterization, 143-202, T. Kundu (Ed.), Pub. CRC Press, 2004.

26. Kundu, T., D. Placko, S. Das, and T. Bore, "Modeling of ultrasonics fields by distributed point source method," Ultrasonic and Electromagnetic NDE for Structure and Material Characterization: Engineering and Biomedical Applications, 109-166, CRC Press, 2012.

27. Placko, D., T. Bore, and T. Kundu, "Distributed point source method for imaging in electrostatic and electromagnetic problems," Ultrasonic and Electromagnetic NDE for Structure and Material Characterization: Engineering and Biomedical Applications, 249-295, CRC Press, 2012.

28. Eskandazade, M., T. Kundu, N. Liebeaux, D. Placko, and F. Mobadersani, "Numerical simulation of electromagnetic acoustic transducers using distributed point source method," Ultrasonics, Vol. 50, No. 6, 583-591, 2010.
doi:10.1016/j.ultras.2009.12.003

29. Joubert, P.-Y., E. Vourc’h, and D. Placko, "Qualitative reconstruction of defects in oriented field eddy current magneto-optical imaging," Proceedings of 14th International IGTE Symposium on Numerical Field Calculation in Electrical Engineering, Graz, Austria, Sep. 19–22, 2010.

30. Bausson, S., V. Thomas, P.-Y. Joubert, L. Blanc-Ferraud, J. Darbon, and G. Aubert, "Regularized inversion of a distributed point source model for the reconstruction of defects in eddy currents imaging," COMPEL, Vol. 30, No. 6, 1777-1791, 2011.
doi:10.1108/03321641111168093

31. Joubert, P.-Y. and J. Pinassaud, "Linear magneto-optic imager for non-destructive evaluation," Sensors and Actuators A, Vol. 129, 126-130, 2006.
doi:10.1016/j.sna.2005.11.028

32. Le Diraison, Y., P.-Y. Joubert, and D. Placko, "Characterization of subsurface defects in aeronautical riveted lap-joints using multi-frequency eddy current imaging," NDT and E Int., Vol. 42, No. 2, 133-140, 2009.
doi:10.1016/j.ndteint.2008.10.005

33. Mook, G., F. Michel, and J. Simonin, "Electromagnetic imaging using probe arrays," 17th World Conference on Nondestructive Testing, WCNDT 2008, Shanghai, China, October 2008.

34. Marchand, B., J. M. Decitre, and O. Casula, "Flexible and array eddy current probes, for fast inspection of complex parts," Review of Quantitative Nondestructive Evaluation, Vol. 29, 313-320, D. O. Thompson, D. E. Chimenti (Eds.), American Institute of Physics, 2010.

35. Novotny, P., P. Saddl, and P. Machac, "A magneto-optic imager for NDT applications," NDT and E Int., Vol. 37, No. 8, 645-649, 2004.
doi:10.1016/j.ndteint.2004.05.002

36. Office of Aviation Research, , Development of an improved magneto optic/eddy current imager, 20591 Final Report DOT/FAA/AR-97/37, Washington DC, 1998.

37. Le, M., J. Lee, and T. Shoji, "A simulation of magneto-optical eddy current imaging," NDT and E Int., Vol. 44, 783-788, 2011.
doi:10.1016/j.ndteint.2011.07.013

38. Grechishkin, R., S. Chigirinski, M. Gusev, O. Cugat, and N. Dempsey, Magnetic Imaging Films, Magnetic Nanostructures in Modern Technology, 195-224, Springer, 2008.
doi:10.1007/978-1-4020-6338-1_11

39. Placko, D., T. Bore, and A. Rivolet, "Imaging and detection of cracks in metallic structures with eddy current sensors," SPIE — Smart Structures/NDE Proceedings, San Diego, California, 2013.