Search search
submit Submit
Publication Date
to
Vol. 139
Latest Volume
All Volumes
PIER 180 [2024] PIER 179 [2024] PIER 178 [2023] PIER 177 [2023] PIER 176 [2023] PIER 175 [2022] PIER 174 [2022] PIER 173 [2022] PIER 172 [2021] PIER 171 [2021] PIER 170 [2021] PIER 169 [2020] PIER 168 [2020] PIER 167 [2020] PIER 166 [2019] PIER 165 [2019] PIER 164 [2019] PIER 163 [2018] PIER 162 [2018] PIER 161 [2018] PIER 160 [2017] PIER 159 [2017] PIER 158 [2017] PIER 157 [2016] PIER 156 [2016] PIER 155 [2016] PIER 154 [2015] PIER 153 [2015] PIER 152 [2015] PIER 151 [2015] PIER 150 [2015] PIER 149 [2014] PIER 148 [2014] PIER 147 [2014] PIER 146 [2014] PIER 145 [2014] PIER 144 [2014] PIER 143 [2013] PIER 142 [2013] PIER 141 [2013] PIER 140 [2013] PIER 139 [2013] PIER 138 [2013] PIER 137 [2013] PIER 136 [2013] PIER 135 [2013] PIER 134 [2013] PIER 133 [2013] PIER 132 [2012] PIER 131 [2012] PIER 130 [2012] PIER 129 [2012] PIER 128 [2012] PIER 127 [2012] PIER 126 [2012] PIER 125 [2012] PIER 124 [2012] PIER 123 [2012] PIER 122 [2012] PIER 121 [2011] PIER 120 [2011] PIER 119 [2011] PIER 118 [2011] PIER 117 [2011] PIER 116 [2011] PIER 115 [2011] PIER 114 [2011] PIER 113 [2011] PIER 112 [2011] PIER 111 [2011] PIER 110 [2010] PIER 109 [2010] PIER 108 [2010] PIER 107 [2010] PIER 106 [2010] PIER 105 [2010] PIER 104 [2010] PIER 103 [2010] PIER 102 [2010] PIER 101 [2010] PIER 100 [2010] PIER 99 [2009] PIER 98 [2009] PIER 97 [2009] PIER 96 [2009] PIER 95 [2009] PIER 94 [2009] PIER 93 [2009] PIER 92 [2009] PIER 91 [2009] PIER 90 [2009] PIER 89 [2009] PIER 88 [2008] PIER 87 [2008] PIER 86 [2008] PIER 85 [2008] PIER 84 [2008] PIER 83 [2008] PIER 82 [2008] PIER 81 [2008] PIER 80 [2008] PIER 79 [2008] PIER 78 [2008] PIER 77 [2007] PIER 76 [2007] PIER 75 [2007] PIER 74 [2007] PIER 73 [2007] PIER 72 [2007] PIER 71 [2007] PIER 70 [2007] PIER 69 [2007] PIER 68 [2007] PIER 67 [2007] PIER 66 [2006] PIER 65 [2006] PIER 64 [2006] PIER 63 [2006] PIER 62 [2006] PIER 61 [2006] PIER 60 [2006] PIER 59 [2006] PIER 58 [2006] PIER 57 [2006] PIER 56 [2006] PIER 55 [2005] PIER 54 [2005] PIER 53 [2005] PIER 52 [2005] PIER 51 [2005] PIER 50 [2005] PIER 49 [2004] PIER 48 [2004] PIER 47 [2004] PIER 46 [2004] PIER 45 [2004] PIER 44 [2004] PIER 43 [2003] PIER 42 [2003] PIER 41 [2003] PIER 40 [2003] PIER 39 [2003] PIER 38 [2002] PIER 37 [2002] PIER 36 [2002] PIER 35 [2002] PIER 34 [2001] PIER 33 [2001] PIER 32 [2001] PIER 31 [2001] PIER 30 [2001] PIER 29 [2000] PIER 28 [2000] PIER 27 [2000] PIER 26 [2000] PIER 25 [2000] PIER 24 [1999] PIER 23 [1999] PIER 22 [1999] PIER 21 [1999] PIER 20 [1998] PIER 19 [1998] PIER 18 [1998] PIER 17 [1997] PIER 16 [1997] PIER 15 [1997] PIER 14 [1996] PIER 13 [1996] PIER 12 [1996] PIER 11 [1995] PIER 10 [1995] PIER 09 [1994] PIER 08 [1994] PIER 07 [1993] PIER 06 [1992] PIER 05 [1991] PIER 04 [1991] PIER 03 [1990] PIER 02 [1990] PIER 01 [1989]
All Journals
PIER PIER B PIER C PIER M PIER Letters
2013-04-27
Scattered Field Computation with an Extended Feti-Dpem2 Method
By
Ivan Voznyuk,

    Dr. Ivan Voznyuk

    CNRS, Ecole Centrale Marseille, Institut Fresnel

    Aix-Marseille Universit

    France

    Homepage

Herve Tortel,

    Dr. Herve Tortel

    Universit´e de Provence Aix-Marseille I

    France

    Homepage

Amelie Litman

    Dr. Amelie Litman

    Universite Aix-Marseille

    France

    Homepage

Progress In Electromagnetics Research, Vol. 139, 247-263, 2013
doi:10.2528/PIER13020113
Abstract
Due to the increasing number of applications in engineering design and optimization, more and more atention has been paid to full-wave simulations based on computational electromagnetics. In particular, the finite-element method (FEM) is well suited for problems involving inhomogeneous and arbitrary shaped objects. Unfortunately, solving large-scale electromagnetic problems with FEM may be time consuming. A numerical scheme, called the dual-primal finite element tearing and interconnecting method (FETI-DPEM2), distinguishes itself through the partioning on the computation domain into non-overlapping subdomains where incomplete solutions of the electrical field are evaluated independently. Next, all the subdomains are ``glued'' together using a modified Robintype transmission condition along each common internal interface, apart from the corner points where a simple Neumann-type boundary condition is imposed. We propose an extension of the FETI-DPEM2 method where we impose a Robin type boundary conditions at each interface point, even at the corner points. We have implemented this Extended FETI-DPEM2 method in a bidimensional configuration while computing the field scattered by a set of heterogeneous, eventually anistropic, scatterers. The results presented here will assert the efficiency of the proposed method with respect to the classical FETI-DPEM2 method, whatever the mesh partition is arbitrary defined.
Citation
Ivan Voznyuk, Herve Tortel, and Amelie Litman, "Scattered Field Computation with an Extended Feti-Dpem2 Method," Progress In Electromagnetics Research, Vol. 139, 247-263, 2013.
doi:10.2528/PIER13020113
References

1. Peterson, A. F., S. L. Ray, and R. Mittra, Computational Methods for Electromagnetics, Oxford University Press, 1998.

2. Jin, J., The Finite Element Method in Electromagnetics, John Wiley & Sons, 2002.

3. Volakis, J. L., A. Chatterjee, and L. C. Kempel, Finite Element Method for Electromagnetics with Application to Antennas, Microwave Circuits, and Scattering, IEEE Press, 1998.

4. Otin, R., L. E. Garcia-Castillo, I. Martinez-Fernandez, and D. Garcia-Donoro, "Computational performance of a weighted regularized Maxwell equation finite element formulation," Progress In Electromagnetics Research, Vol. 136, 61-77, 2013.

5. Dziekonski, A., P. Sypek, A. Lamecki, and M. Mrozowski, "Finite element matrix generation on a GPU," Progress In Electromagnetics Research, Vol. 128, 249-265, 2012.

6. Gomez-Revuelto, I., L. E. Garcia-Castillo, and L. F. Demkowicz, "A comparison between PML, infinite elements and an iterative BEM as mesh truncation methods for HP self-adaptive procedures in electromagnetics," Progress In Electromagnetics Research, Vol. 126, 499-519, 2012.

7. Gomez-Revuelto, I., L. E. Garcia-Castillo, and M. Salazar-Palma, "Goal-oriented self-adaptive HP-strategies for finite element analysis of electromagnetic scattering and radiation problems," Progress In Electromagnetics Research, Vol. 125, 459-482, 2012.

8. Otin, R. and H. Gromat, "Specific absorption rate computations with a nodal-based finite element formulation," Progress In Electromagnetics Research, Vol. 128, 399-418, 2012.

9. Amestoy, P. R., I. S. Du, and J.-Y. L'Excellent, "Multifrontal parallel distributed symmetric and unsymmetric solvers," Comput. Methods in Appl. Mech. Eng., Vol. 184, 501-520, 2000, SeeInternet Address: http://graal.ens-lyon.fr/MUMPS.

10. Amestoy, P. R., I. S. Du, J. Koster, and J.-Y. L'Excellent, "A fully asynchronous multifrontal solver using distributed dynamic scheduling," SIAM Journal on Matrix Analysis and Applications, Vol. 23, No. 1, 15-41, 2001.

11. , , "WSMP: Watson sparse matrix package,", See Internet Address:, http://www-users.cs.umn.edu/»agupta/wsmp.html.

12. Davis, T. A., "Algorithm 832: UMFPACK, an unsymmetricpat-tern multifrontal method," ACM Transactions on Mathematical Software, Vol. 30, No. 2, 196-199, 2004.

13. Zhu, Y. and A. C. Cangellaris, Multigrid Finite Element Method for Electromagnetic Field Modeling, Wiley-IEEE Press, 2006.

14. Ernst, O. G. and M. J. Gander, "Why is it dicult to solve Helmholtz problems with classical iterative methods," Numerical Analysis of Multiscale Problems, Vol. 83, 325-361, 2011.

15. Zhao, K., M. N. Vouvakis, and J.-F. Lee, "Application of DPFETI domain decomposition method for the negative index of refraction materials," IEEE Antennas and Propagation Society International Symposium, Vol. 3B, 26-29, 2005.

16. Zhao, K. and J.-F. Lee, "An accelerated non-conforming DP- FETI domain decomposition method for the analysis of large EMC problems," Electromagnetic Compatibility Symposium, 200-203, 2006.

17. Zhao, K., V. Rawat, S.-C. Lee, and J.-F. Lee, "A domain decomposition method with nonconformal meshes for nite periodic and semi-periodic structures," IEEE Transactions on Antennas and Propagation, Vol. 55, No. 9, 2559-2570, 2007.

18. Zhao, K., V. Rawat, and J.-F. Lee, "A domain decomposition method for electromagnetic radiation and scattering analysis of multi-target problems," IEEE Transactions on Antennas and Propagation, Vol. 56, No. 8, 2211-2221, 2008.

19. Farhat, C. and J. Mandel, "The two-level FETI method for static and dynamic plate problems - Part I: An optimal iterative solver for biharmonic systems," Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering, Vol. 155, No. 1-2, 129-151, 1998.

20. Farhat, C., P. S. Chen, J. Mandel, and F. X. Roux, "The two-level FETI method - Part II: Extension to shell problems, parallel implementation and performance results," Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering, Vol. 155, No. 1-2, 153-179, 1998.

21. Farhat, C., A. Macedo, M. Lesoinne, F. X. Roux, F. Magoules, and A. de la Bourdonnaie, "Two-level domain decomposition methods with Lagrange multipliers for the fast iterative solution of acoustic scattering problems," Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering, Vol. 184, No. 2-4, 213-239, 2000.

22. Farhat, C., P. Avery, R. Tezaur, and J. Li, "FETI-DPH: A dual-primal domain decomposition method for acoustic scattering," Journal of Computational Acoustics, Vol. 13, No. 3, 499-524, 2005.

23. Boubendir, Y., X. Antoine, and C. Geuzaine, "A quasi-optimal non-overlapping domain decomposition algorithm for the Helmholtz equation," Journal of Computational Physics, Vol. 231, No. 2, 262-280, 2012.

24. Farhat, C., A. Macedo, and M. Lesoinne, "A two-level domain decomposition method for the iterative solution of high frequency exterior Helmholtz problems," Numerische Mathematik, Vol. 85, No. 2, 283-308, 2000.

25. Farhat, C., R. Tezaur, and J. Toivanen, "A domain decomposition method for discontinuous Galerkin discretizations of Helmholtz problems with plane waves and Lagrange multipliers," International Journal For Numerical Methods in Engineering, Vol. 78, No. 13, 1513-1531, 2009.

26. Li, Y. and J.-M. Jin, "A vector dual-primal nite element tearing and interconnecting method for solving 3-D large-scale electromagnetic problems," IEEE Transactions on Antennas and Propagation, Vol. 54, No. 10, 3000-3009, 2006.

27. Li, Y.-J. and J.-M. Jin, "A new dual-primal domain decomposition approach for nite element simulation of 3-D large-scale electromagnetic problems," IEEE Transactions on Antennas and Propagation, Vol. 55, No. 10, 2803-2810, 2007.

28. Li, Y.-J. and J.-M. Jin, "Implementation of the second-order ABC in the FETI-DPEM method for 3D EM problems," IEEE Transactions on Antennas and Propagation, Vol. 56, No. 8, 2765-2769, 2008.

29. Dolean, V., S. Lanteri, and R. Perrussel, "A domain decomposition method for solving the three-dimensional time-harmonic Maxwell equations discretized by discontinuous Galerkin methods," Journal of Computational Physics, Vol. 227, No. 3, 2044-2072, 2008.

30. Dolean, V., M. J. Gander, and L. Gerardo-Giorda, "Optimized Schwarz methods for Maxwell's equations," SIAM Journal on Scientic Computing, Vol. 31, No. 3, 2193-2213, 2009.

31. Dolean, V., M. El Bouajaji, M. J. Gander, and S. Lanteri, "Optimized Schwarz methods for Maxwell's equations with nonzero electric conductivity," Domain Decomposition Methods in Science and Engineering XIX, Vol. 78, 269-276, 2011.

32. Fernandez-Recio, R., L. E. Garcia-Castillo, S. Llorente-Romano, and I. Gomez-Revuelto, "Convergence study of a non-standard Schwarz domain decomposition method for finite element mesh truncation in electro-magnetics," Progress In Electromagnetics Research, Vol. 120, 439-457, 2011.

33. Vouvakis, M. N., Z. Cendes, and J.-F. Lee, "A FEM domain decomposition method for photonic and electromagnetic band gap structures," IEEE Transactions on Antennas and Propagation, Vol. 54, No. 2, 721-733, 2006.

34. Xue, M.-F. and J.-M. Jin, "Nonconformal FETI-DP methods for large-scale electromagnetic simulation," IEEE Transactions on Antennas and Propagation, Vol. 60, No. 9, 4291-4305, 2012.

35. Dolean, V., S. Lanteri, and R. Perrussel, "Optimized Schwarz algorithms for solving time-harmonic Maxwell's equations discretized by a discontinuous Galerkin method," IEEE Transactions on Magnetics, Vol. 44, No. 6, 954-957, 2008.

36. Farhat, C., M. Lesoinne, P. LeTallec, K. Pierson, and D. Rixen, "FETI-DP: A dual-primal unied FETI method - Part I: A faster alternative to the two-level FETI method," International Journal for Numerical Methods in Engineering, Vol. 50, No. 7, 1523-1544, 2001.

37. Geuzaine, C. and J. F. Remacle, "GMSH: A three-dimensional finite element mesh generator with built-in pre- and post-processing facilities,", See Internet Address: http://www.geuz.org/gmsh/.

38. Karipis, , "METIS - Family of multilevel partitioning algorithms,", See Internet Address:, http://glaros.dtc.umn.edu/gkhome/views/metis.

Download Full Article (343) View Full Article volume
The EM Academy piers.org jpier.org Who's Who in EM
Copyright © 2022 The Electromagnetics Academy. All Rights Reserved.