Vol. 46

Front:[PDF file] Back:[PDF file]
Latest Volume
All Volumes
All Issues
2016-03-01

Mesh Optimization for Maxwell's Equations with Respect to Anisotropic Materials Using Geometric Algebra

By Mariusz Klimek, Sebastian Schops, and Thomas Weiland
Progress In Electromagnetics Research M, Vol. 46, 153-163, 2016
doi:10.2528/PIERM15110402

Abstract

Clifford's Geometric Algebra provides an elegant formulation of Maxwell's equations in the spacetime setting. Its clear geometric interpretation is used to derive a goal function, whose minimization results in Hodge-optimized material matrices being diagonal or diagonal-dominant. Effectively it is an optimization of the primal/dual mesh pair of a finite difference based discretization scheme taking into account the material properties. As a research example a standing wave in 2D cavity filled with an anisotropic material is investigated. Convergence of the scheme for various choices of mesh pairs is discussed. The limitations of the method in the 3D case are presented.

Citation


Mariusz Klimek, Sebastian Schops, and Thomas Weiland, "Mesh Optimization for Maxwell's Equations with Respect to Anisotropic Materials Using Geometric Algebra," Progress In Electromagnetics Research M, Vol. 46, 153-163, 2016.
doi:10.2528/PIERM15110402
http://jpier.org/PIERM/pier.php?paper=15110402

References


    1. Doran, C. and A. Lasenby, Geometric Algebra for Physicists, 2nd Ed., Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 2003.
    doi:10.1017/CBO9780511807497

    2. Klimek, M., U. Roemer, S. Schoeps, and T. Weiland, "Space-time discretization of Maxwell’s equations in the setting of geometric algebra," IEEE Proceedings of 2013 URSI International Symposium on Electromagnetic Theory (EMTS), 1101-1104, 2013.

    3. Tonti, E., "Finite formulation of the electromagnetic field," Progress In Electromagnetics Research, Vol. 32, 1-44, 2001.
    doi:10.2528/PIER00080101

    4. Weiland, T., "Time domain electromagnetic field computation with finite difference methods," International Journal of Numerical Modelling, Vol. 9, 295-319, 1996.
    doi:10.1002/(SICI)1099-1204(199607)9:4<295::AID-JNM240>3.0.CO;2-8

    5. Sobczyk, G., "Simplicial calculus with geometric algebra," Clifford Algebras and Their Applications in Mathematical Physics, 279-292, Springer, 2011.

    6. Hestenes, D., "Differential forms in geometric calculus," Clifford Algebras and their Applications in Mathematical Physics, 269-285, Springer, 1993.
    doi:10.1007/978-94-011-2006-7_31

    7. Mullen, P., P. Memari, F. de Goes, and M. Desbrun, "HOT: Hodge-optimized triangulations," ACM Trans. Graph, Vol. 30, 103:1-103:12, 2011.
    doi:10.1145/2010324.1964998

    8. Bellver-Cebreros, C. and M. Rodriguez-Danta, "An alternative model for wave propagation in anisotropic impedance-matched metamaterials," Progress In Electromagnetics Research, Vol. 141, 149-160, 2013.
    doi:10.2528/PIER13060510

    9. Lindell, I. V., "Electromagnetic wave equation in differential-form representation," Progress In Electromagnetics Research, Vol. 54, 321-333, 2005.
    doi:10.2528/PIER05021002

    10. Stern, A., Y. Tong, M. Desbrun, and J. E. Marsden, "Geometric computational electrodynamics with variational integrators and discrete differential forms," Geometry, Mechanics, and Dynamics, Vol. 73, 437-475, Springer, 2015.