Vol. 42

Front:[PDF file] Back:[PDF file]
Latest Volume
All Volumes
All Issues
2012-07-24

Experimental Performance Comparison of Six-Port and Conventional Zero-IF/Low-IF Receivers for Software Defined Radio

By Cristina de la Morena-Álvarez-Palencia and Mateo Burgos-Garcia
Progress In Electromagnetics Research B, Vol. 42, 311-333, 2012
doi:10.2528/PIERB12061210

Abstract

This paper presents an experimental performance comparison among three RF architectures that are very suitable for Software Defined Radio (SDR) implementation: zero-IF, low-IF, and six-port network. A six-port receiver and a dual zero-IF/low-IF receiver have been developed for this purpose. Six-port receiver is a very promising and flexible RF architecture for the low-cost implementation of integrated microwave and millimeter-wave systems. Competitive advantages such as ultra-broadband behavior, low-cost, reconfigurability, and low power consumption, point to the six-port architecture as a good candidate to implement a SDR. However, two issues on broadband six-port receivers require intensive research: dynamic range extension, and miniaturization. In this paper, two solutions are proposed to solve these problems: the use of biased detector diodes for dynamic range extension, and the use of low temperature co-fired ceramic (LTCC) technology for six-port reduction. The measurement results indicate that the six-port receiver shows high potential benefits and advantages compared to conventional zero-IF and low-IF receivers. In addition, the capability of the six-port architecture to operate as both zero-IF and low-IF receivers has been experimentally demonstrated for the first time.

Citation


Cristina de la Morena-Álvarez-Palencia and Mateo Burgos-Garcia, "Experimental Performance Comparison of Six-Port and Conventional Zero-IF/Low-IF Receivers for Software Defined Radio," Progress In Electromagnetics Research B, Vol. 42, 311-333, 2012.
doi:10.2528/PIERB12061210
http://jpier.org/PIERB/pier.php?paper=12061210

References


    1. Bagheri, R., A. Mirzaei, M. E. Heidari, S. Chehrazi, M. Lee, M. Mikhemar, W. K. Tang, and A. A. Abidi, "Software-defined radio receiver: Dream to reality," IEEE Communications Mag., Vol. 44, No. 8, 111-118, Aug. 2006.
    doi:10.1109/MCOM.2006.1678118

    2. Abidi, A. A., "The path to the software-defined radio receiver," IEEE J. Solid-State Circuits, Vol. 42, No. 5, 954-966, May 2007.
    doi:10.1109/JSSC.2007.894307

    3. Luy, J.-F., "Software configurable receivers," European Microwave Conf., 1-8, Sep. 2002.

    4. Wu, K., "Multiport interferometer techniques for innovative transceiver applications," IEEE Radio and Wireless Symp., 531-534, New Orleans, LA, Jan. 2010.

    5. Puvaneswari, O. S., "Wideband analog front-end for multistandard software defined radio receiver," IEEE Int. Symp. Personal, Indoor and Mobile Radio Communications, Vol. 3, 1937-1941, Sep. 2004.

    6. Khaddaj Mallat, N., E. Moldovan, and S. O. Tatu, "Comparative demodulation results for six-port and conventional 60 GHz direct conversion receivers ," Progress In Electromagnetics Research, Vol. 84, 437-449, 2008.
    doi:10.2528/PIER08081003

    7. Razavi, B., "Design considerations for direct-conversion receivers," IEEE Trans. Circuits Syst., Vol. 44, No. 6, 428-435, Jun. 1997.
    doi:10.1109/82.592569

    8. Crols, J. and M. S. J. Steyaert, "Low-IF topologies for high-performance analog front ends of fully integrated receivers," IEEE Trans. Circuits Syst. II, Analog. Digit. Signal Process., Vol. 45, No. 3, 269-282, Mar. 1998.
    doi:10.1109/82.664233

    9. Hartley, R., "Single-sideband modulator,", U.S. Patent 1 666 206, Apr. 1928.

    10. Weaver, D. K., "A third method of generation and detection of singlesideband signals," Proc. IRE, Vol. 44, 1703-1705, 1956.
    doi:10.1109/JRPROC.1956.275061

    11. Hentschel, T., "The six-port as a communications receiver," IEEE Trans. Microw. Theory Tech., Vol. 53, No. 3, 1039-1047, Mar. 2005.
    doi:10.1109/TMTT.2005.843507

    12. Neveux, G., B. Huyart, and G. J. Rodriguez-Guisantes, "Wide-band RF receiver using the `five-port' technology," IEEE Trans. Vehicular Technology, Vol. 53, No. 5, 1441-1451, Sep. 2004.
    doi:10.1109/TVT.2004.832392

    13. De la Morena-Álvarez-Palencia, C., K. Mabrouk, B. Huyart, A. Mbaye, and M. Burgos-García, "Direct baseband I-Q regeneration method for five-port receivers improving DC-offset and second-order intermodulation distortion rejection," IEEE Trans. Microw. Theory Tech., Vol. 60, No. 8, 2012.
    doi:10.1109/TMTT.2012.2199512

    14. De la Morena-Álvarez-Palencia, C. and M. Burgos-García, "Four-octave six-port receiver and its calibration for broadband communications and software defined radios," Progress In Electromagnetics Research, Vol. 116, 1-21, 2011.

    15. De la Morena-Álvarez-Palencia, C., M. Burgos-García, and D. Rodríguez-Aparicio, "Three octave six-port network for a broadband software radio receiver," European Microwave Conf., Vol. 1110, No. 1113, Paris, France, 2010.

    16. Bahl, I. and P. Bhartia, Microwave Solid State Circuit Design, Chapter 11.2, John Wiley & Sons, Inc., 1988.

    17. Hewlett-Packard Application Note 956-5, , "Dynamic range extension of schottky detectors,", 1975.

    18. De la Morena-Álvarez-Palencia, C., M. Burgos-García, and . Rodríguez-Aparicio, "Software defined radio technologies for emergency and professional wide band communications," IEEE Int. Carnahan Conf. Security Tech., 357-363, San Jose, CA, Oct. 5-8, 2010.

    19. Xu, Y. and R. G. Bosisio, "On the real time calibration of six-port receivers," Microw. Opt. Technol. Lett., Vol. 20, No. 5, 318-322, 1999.
    doi:10.1002/(SICI)1098-2760(19990305)20:5<318::AID-MOP11>3.0.CO;2-1

    20. Perez-Lara, P., J. A. Medina-Rodriguez, I. Molina-Fernandez, J. G. Wanguemert-Perez, and A. Gonzalez-Salguero, "Wideband homodyne six-port receiver with high LO-RF isolation," IET Microw. Antennas Propag., Vol. 3, No. 5, 882-888, 2009.
    doi:10.1049/iet-map.2008.0288

    21. Tatu, S. O. and T. A. Denidni, "New millimeter-wave six-port heterodyne receiver architecture," IEEE MTT-S Int. Microwave Symp. Dig., 1999-2002, Jun. 2006.
    doi:10.1109/MWSYM.2006.249845

    22. Boukari, B., E. Moldovan, S. Affes, K. Wu, R. G. Bosisio, and S. O. Tatu, "A heterodyne six-port FMCW radar sensor architecture based on beat signal phase slope techniques," Progress In Electromagnetics Research, Vol. 93, 307-322, 2009.
    doi:10.2528/PIER09052610

    23. Fusco, V. and C. Wang, "V-band 57-65 GHz receiver," IET Microwaves, Antennas & Propagation, Vol. 4, No. 1, 1-7, Jan. 2010.
    doi:10.1049/iet-map.2008.0424

    24. Hammou, D., E. Modovan, and S. O. Tatu, "Modelling and analysis of a modified V-band MHMIC six-port circuits," Journal of Electromagnetic Waves and Applications, Vol. 24, No. 10, 1419-1427, 2010.
    doi:10.1163/156939310791958644

    25. Abielmona, S., H. V. Nguyen, C. Caloz, K. Wu, and R. G. Bosisio, "Compact multilayer ultra-wideband six-port device for modulation/demodulation," Electronics Lett., Vol. 43, No. 15, 813-814, Jul. 2007.
    doi:10.1049/el:20070678

    26. Winter, S. M., A. Koelpin, and R. Weigel, "Six-port receiver analog front-end: Multilayer design and system simulation," IEEE Trans. Circuits Sist. II, Vol. 55, No. 3, 254-258, Mar. 2008.
    doi:10.1109/TCSII.2008.918999

    27. De la Morena-Álvarez-Palencia, C., M. Burgos, and J. Gismero-Menoyo, "Contribution of LTCC technology to the miniaturization of six-port networks," European Microw. Conf., 659-662, Manchester, UK, Oct. 2011.