Vol. 25
Latest Volume
All Volumes
PIERB 105 [2024] PIERB 104 [2024] PIERB 103 [2023] PIERB 102 [2023] PIERB 101 [2023] PIERB 100 [2023] PIERB 99 [2023] PIERB 98 [2023] PIERB 97 [2022] PIERB 96 [2022] PIERB 95 [2022] PIERB 94 [2021] PIERB 93 [2021] PIERB 92 [2021] PIERB 91 [2021] PIERB 90 [2021] PIERB 89 [2020] PIERB 88 [2020] PIERB 87 [2020] PIERB 86 [2020] PIERB 85 [2019] PIERB 84 [2019] PIERB 83 [2019] PIERB 82 [2018] PIERB 81 [2018] PIERB 80 [2018] PIERB 79 [2017] PIERB 78 [2017] PIERB 77 [2017] PIERB 76 [2017] PIERB 75 [2017] PIERB 74 [2017] PIERB 73 [2017] PIERB 72 [2017] PIERB 71 [2016] PIERB 70 [2016] PIERB 69 [2016] PIERB 68 [2016] PIERB 67 [2016] PIERB 66 [2016] PIERB 65 [2016] PIERB 64 [2015] PIERB 63 [2015] PIERB 62 [2015] PIERB 61 [2014] PIERB 60 [2014] PIERB 59 [2014] PIERB 58 [2014] PIERB 57 [2014] PIERB 56 [2013] PIERB 55 [2013] PIERB 54 [2013] PIERB 53 [2013] PIERB 52 [2013] PIERB 51 [2013] PIERB 50 [2013] PIERB 49 [2013] PIERB 48 [2013] PIERB 47 [2013] PIERB 46 [2013] PIERB 45 [2012] PIERB 44 [2012] PIERB 43 [2012] PIERB 42 [2012] PIERB 41 [2012] PIERB 40 [2012] PIERB 39 [2012] PIERB 38 [2012] PIERB 37 [2012] PIERB 36 [2012] PIERB 35 [2011] PIERB 34 [2011] PIERB 33 [2011] PIERB 32 [2011] PIERB 31 [2011] PIERB 30 [2011] PIERB 29 [2011] PIERB 28 [2011] PIERB 27 [2011] PIERB 26 [2010] PIERB 25 [2010] PIERB 24 [2010] PIERB 23 [2010] PIERB 22 [2010] PIERB 21 [2010] PIERB 20 [2010] PIERB 19 [2010] PIERB 18 [2009] PIERB 17 [2009] PIERB 16 [2009] PIERB 15 [2009] PIERB 14 [2009] PIERB 13 [2009] PIERB 12 [2009] PIERB 11 [2009] PIERB 10 [2008] PIERB 9 [2008] PIERB 8 [2008] PIERB 7 [2008] PIERB 6 [2008] PIERB 5 [2008] PIERB 4 [2008] PIERB 3 [2008] PIERB 2 [2008] PIERB 1 [2008]
2010-09-07
Shape Slope Parameter Distribution Modelling of Electromagnetic Scattering by Rain Drops
By
Progress In Electromagnetics Research B, Vol. 25, 191-209, 2010
Abstract
Gamma model parameters using 2nd, 3rd and 4th moments are calculated from the drop size data of Singapore. The gamma model is simplified into two parameter model by finding a relation between the shape and slope parameters, μ and Λ. Due to the poor correlation found between μ and Λ, the drop size data is filtered based on their rain rates before a good correlation between the two parameters can be found. The μ-Λ relations are then fitted for the different ranges of rain rate filtering. Scatter plots of μ and Λ are plotted with constant median volume diameter (D0) lines. The μ-Λ relations for the different rain types for the tropical island of Singapore are proposed and compared with the μ-Λ relations from three other countries of different climatic zones. T-Matrix calculations are performed to find the polarimetric variables at S-band by using the gamma DSD calculated from the Singapore's drop size data. The calculated differential reflectivity and horizontal reflectivity are used along with the best μ-Λ relations to find the gamma model parameters. The retrieved rain rate using polarimetric variables is compared with the distrometer's measured rain rate. Results show a good agreement between the retrieved rain rate and the measured rain rate. Therefore, the proposed shape slope relationship is found to be suitable for rain rate retrieval.
Citation
Lakshmi Sutha Kumar, Yee Hui Lee, and Jin Teong Ong, "Shape Slope Parameter Distribution Modelling of Electromagnetic Scattering by Rain Drops," Progress In Electromagnetics Research B, Vol. 25, 191-209, 2010.
doi:10.2528/PIERB10072101
References

1. Mandeep, J. S., "Equatorial rainfall measurement on Ku-band satellite communication downlink," Progress In Electromagnetics Research, Vol. 76, 195-200, 2007.
doi:10.2528/PIER07070901

2. Zhang, G., J. Vivekanandan, and E. Brandes, "A method for estimating rain rate and drop size distribution from polarimetric Radar measurements," IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing, Vol. 39, No. 4, 830-840, Apr. 2001.
doi:10.1109/36.917906

3. Ulbrich, C. W., "Natural variation in the analytical form of the raindrop size distribution," J. Climate Appl. Meteor., Vol. 22, No. 10, 1764-1775, 1983.
doi:10.1175/1520-0450(1983)022<1764:NVITAF>2.0.CO;2

4. Gurvich, A. S. and V. Kan, "Structure of air density irregularities in the stratosphere from spacecraft observations of stellar scintillation: 1. Three-dimensional spectrum model and recovery of its parameters," Atmospheric and Oceanic Physics, Vol. 39, No. 3, 300-310, 2003.

5. Brandes, E. A., G. Zhang, and J. Vivekanandan, "An evaluation of a drop distribution based polarimetric radar rainfall estimator," Journal of Applied Meteorology, Vol. 42, No. 5, 652-660, 2003.
doi:10.1175/1520-0450(2003)042<0652:AEOADD>2.0.CO;2

6. Zhang, G., J. Vivekanandan, E. Brandes, R. Menegini, and T. Kozu, "The shape-slope relation in observed gamma raindrop size distributions: Statistical error or useful information?," Journal of Atmospheric and Oceanic Technology, Vol. 20, No. 8, 1106-1119, 2003.
doi:10.1175/1520-0426(2003)020<1106:TSRIOG>2.0.CO;2

7. Seifert, A. K., "On the shape-slope relation of drop size distributions in convective rain," Journal of Applied Meteorology, Vol. 44, No. 7, 1146-1151, 2005.
doi:10.1175/JAM2254.1

8. Moisseev, D. N. and V. Chandrasekar, "Examination of μ-Λ relation suggested for drop size distribution parameters," Journal of Atmospheric and Oceanic Technology, Vol. 24, No. 5, 847-855, 2007.
doi:10.1175/JTECH2010.1

9. Anagnostou, M. N., E. N. Anagnostou, J. Vivekanandan, and F. L. Ogden, "Comparison of raindrop size distribution estimates from X-band and S-band polarimetric observations," IEEE Geosci. Remote Sens. Lett., Vol. 4, No. 4, 601-605, Oct. 2007.
doi:10.1109/LGRS.2007.903061

10. Cao, Q., G. Zhang, E. Brandes, T. Schuur, A. Ryzhkov, and K. Ikeda, "Analysis of video disdrometer and polarimetric radar data to characterize rain microphysics in Oklahoma," Journal of Applied Meteorology, Vol. 47, No. 8, 2238-2255, 2008.
doi:10.1175/2008JAMC1732.1

11. Cao, Q. and G. Zhang, "Errors in estimating raindrop size distribution parameters employing disdrometer and simulated raindrop spectra," Journal of Applied Meteorology and Climatology, Vol. 48, No. 2, 406-425, 2009.
doi:10.1175/2008JAMC2026.1

12. Rao, T. N., N. V. P. Kirankumar, B. Radhakrishna, and D. N. Rao, "On the variability of the shape-slope parameter relations of the gamma raindrop size distribution model," Geophysical Research Letters, Vol. 33, L22809, 2006, doi:10.1029/2006GL028440.

13. Brawn, D. and G. Upton, "On the measurement of atmospheric gamma drop-size distributions," Atmos. Sci. Let., Vol. 9, No. 4, 245-247, 2008.
doi:10.1002/asl.198

14. Munchak, S. J. and A. Tokay, "Retrieval of raindrop size distribution from simulated dual-frequency radar measurements," Journal of Applied Meteorology and Climatology, Vol. 47, No. 1, 223-239, 2008.
doi:10.1175/2007JAMC1524.1

15. Atlas, D. and C. W. Ulbrich, "Drop size spectra and integral remote sensing parameters in the transition from convective to stratiform rain," Geophysical Research Letters, Vol. 33, L16803, 2006, doi:10.1029/ 2006GL026824.

16. Tokay, A., D. A. Short, C. R. Williams, W. L. Ecklund, and K. S. Gage, "Tropical rainfall associated with convective and stratiform clouds: intercomparison of disdrometer and profiler measurements," Journal of Applied Meteorology, Vol. 38, No. 3, 302-320, 1999.
doi:10.1175/1520-0450(1999)038<0302:TRAWCA>2.0.CO;2

17. Caracciolo, C., F. Porcu, and F. Prodi, "Precipitation classification at mid-latitudes in terms of drop size distribution parameters," Advances in Geosciences, Vol. 16, 11-17, 2008.
doi:10.5194/adgeo-16-11-2008

18. Gunn, R. and K. D. Kinzer, "The terminal velocity of fall for water droplets in stagnant air," J. Metero., Vol. 6, No. 4, 243-248, 1949.
doi:10.1175/1520-0469(1949)006<0243:TTVOFF>2.0.CO;2

19. Smith, P. L., "Raindrop size distributions: Exponential or gamma --- Does the difference matter?," Journal of Applied Meteorology, Vol. 42, No. 7, 1031-1034, 2003.
doi:10.1175/1520-0450(2003)042<1031:RSDEOG>2.0.CO;2

20. Ulbrich, C. W. and D. Atlas, "Rain microphysics and radar properties: Analysis methods for drop size spectra," Journal of Applied Meteorology, Vol. 37, No. 9, 912-923, 1998.
doi:10.1175/1520-0450(1998)037<0912:RMARPA>2.0.CO;2

21. Tokay, A., A. Kruger, and W. F. Krajewski, "Comparison of drop size distribution measurements by impact and optical disdrometers," Journal of Applied Meteorology, Vol. 40, No. 11, 2083-2097, 2001.
doi:10.1175/1520-0450(2001)040<2083:CODSDM>2.0.CO;2

22. Thurai, M., G. J. Huang, V. N. Bringi, W. L. Randeu, and M. Schonhuber, "Drop shapes, model comparisons, and calculations of polarimetric radar parameters in rain," Journal of Atmospheric and Oceanic Technology, Vol. 24, No. 6, 1019-1032, Jun. 2007.
doi:10.1175/JTECH2051.1

23. Beard, K. V. and C. Chuang, "A new model for the equilibrium shape of raindrops," J. Atmos. Sci., Vol. 44, No. 11, 1509-1524, 1987.
doi:10.1175/1520-0469(1987)044<1509:ANMFTE>2.0.CO;2