Vol. 128
Latest Volume
All Volumes
PIERM 130 [2024] PIERM 129 [2024] PIERM 128 [2024] PIERM 127 [2024] PIERM 126 [2024] PIERM 125 [2024] PIERM 124 [2024] PIERM 123 [2024] PIERM 122 [2023] PIERM 121 [2023] PIERM 120 [2023] PIERM 119 [2023] PIERM 118 [2023] PIERM 117 [2023] PIERM 116 [2023] PIERM 115 [2023] PIERM 114 [2022] PIERM 113 [2022] PIERM 112 [2022] PIERM 111 [2022] PIERM 110 [2022] PIERM 109 [2022] PIERM 108 [2022] PIERM 107 [2022] PIERM 106 [2021] PIERM 105 [2021] PIERM 104 [2021] PIERM 103 [2021] PIERM 102 [2021] PIERM 101 [2021] PIERM 100 [2021] PIERM 99 [2021] PIERM 98 [2020] PIERM 97 [2020] PIERM 96 [2020] PIERM 95 [2020] PIERM 94 [2020] PIERM 93 [2020] PIERM 92 [2020] PIERM 91 [2020] PIERM 90 [2020] PIERM 89 [2020] PIERM 88 [2020] PIERM 87 [2019] PIERM 86 [2019] PIERM 85 [2019] PIERM 84 [2019] PIERM 83 [2019] PIERM 82 [2019] PIERM 81 [2019] PIERM 80 [2019] PIERM 79 [2019] PIERM 78 [2019] PIERM 77 [2019] PIERM 76 [2018] PIERM 75 [2018] PIERM 74 [2018] PIERM 73 [2018] PIERM 72 [2018] PIERM 71 [2018] PIERM 70 [2018] PIERM 69 [2018] PIERM 68 [2018] PIERM 67 [2018] PIERM 66 [2018] PIERM 65 [2018] PIERM 64 [2018] PIERM 63 [2018] PIERM 62 [2017] PIERM 61 [2017] PIERM 60 [2017] PIERM 59 [2017] PIERM 58 [2017] PIERM 57 [2017] PIERM 56 [2017] PIERM 55 [2017] PIERM 54 [2017] PIERM 53 [2017] PIERM 52 [2016] PIERM 51 [2016] PIERM 50 [2016] PIERM 49 [2016] PIERM 48 [2016] PIERM 47 [2016] PIERM 46 [2016] PIERM 45 [2016] PIERM 44 [2015] PIERM 43 [2015] PIERM 42 [2015] PIERM 41 [2015] PIERM 40 [2014] PIERM 39 [2014] PIERM 38 [2014] PIERM 37 [2014] PIERM 36 [2014] PIERM 35 [2014] PIERM 34 [2014] PIERM 33 [2013] PIERM 32 [2013] PIERM 31 [2013] PIERM 30 [2013] PIERM 29 [2013] PIERM 28 [2013] PIERM 27 [2012] PIERM 26 [2012] PIERM 25 [2012] PIERM 24 [2012] PIERM 23 [2012] PIERM 22 [2012] PIERM 21 [2011] PIERM 20 [2011] PIERM 19 [2011] PIERM 18 [2011] PIERM 17 [2011] PIERM 16 [2011] PIERM 14 [2010] PIERM 13 [2010] PIERM 12 [2010] PIERM 11 [2010] PIERM 10 [2009] PIERM 9 [2009] PIERM 8 [2009] PIERM 7 [2009] PIERM 6 [2009] PIERM 5 [2008] PIERM 4 [2008] PIERM 3 [2008] PIERM 2 [2008] PIERM 1 [2008]
2024-08-26
Numerical Modeling of GPR for Underground Multi-Pipes Detection by Combining GprMax and Deep Learning Model
By
Progress In Electromagnetics Research M, Vol. 128, 99-113, 2024
Abstract
As a popular nondestructive technique, ground penetrating radar (GPR) is extensively utilized for detecting underground pipelines. In this paper, an efficient and automatic scheme is presented for the detection and classification of underground pipelines by combining electromagnetic modeling and machine learning techniques. By virtue of open-source gprMax software, the B-Scan signatures of underground pipelines are simulated and analyzed in detail, with four types of underground pipelines taken into account, i.e., iron pipelines, concrete pipelines, copper pipelines, and PVC pipelines. On the basis of electromagnetic modeling, B-scan profiles of underground pipelines are preprocessed by using the average method and time gain compensation method to obtain a dataset for training neural network of YOLOv8 model. The simulations indicate that our scheme combining simulated B-Scan profiles and YOLOv8 model is able to detect and classify underground pipelines with high accuracy, and the category and material of underground pipelines can be determined with a high confidence level. Specifically, the detection time of a single B-scan image for underground pipelines is about 0.02s, and the average detection accuracy can reach 0.995, which is potentially valuable for the automatic detection and classification of underground pipelines in GPR applications.
Citation
Qiang Guo, Peng-Ju Yang, Rui Wu, and Yuqiang Zhang, "Numerical Modeling of GPR for Underground Multi-Pipes Detection by Combining GprMax and Deep Learning Model," Progress In Electromagnetics Research M, Vol. 128, 99-113, 2024.
doi:10.2528/PIERM24062603
References

1. Frigui, Hichem and Paul Gader, "Detection and discrimination of land mines in ground-penetrating radar based on edge histogram descriptors and a possibilistic K-nearest neighbor classifier," IEEE Transactions on Fuzzy Systems, Vol. 17, No. 1, 185-199, 2008.

2. Muggleton, J. M., M. J. Brennan, and Y. Gao, "Determining the location of buried plastic water pipes from measurements of ground surface vibration," Journal of Applied Geophysics, Vol. 75, No. 1, 54-61, 2011.

3. Sagnard, Florence and Jean-Philippe Tarel, "Template-matching based detection of hyperbolas in ground-penetrating radargrams for buried utilities," Journal of Geophysics and Engineering, Vol. 13, No. 4, 491-504, 2016.

4. Tong, Zheng, Jie Gao, and Dongdong Yuan, "Advances of deep learning applications in ground-penetrating radar: A survey," Construction and Building Materials, Vol. 258, 120371, 2020.

5. Bai, Xu, Yu Yang, Shouming Wei, Guanyi Chen, Hongrui Li, Yuhao Li, Haoxiang Tian, Tianxiang Zhang, and Haitao Cui, "A comprehensive review of conventional and deep learning approaches for ground-penetrating radar detection of raw data," Applied Sciences, Vol. 13, No. 13, 7992, 2023.

6. Al-Nuaimy, W., Y. Huang, M. Nakhkash, M. T. C. Fang, V. T. Nguyen, and A. Eriksen, "Automatic detection of buried utilities and solid objects with GPR using neural networks and pattern recognition," Journal of Applied Geophysics, Vol. 43, No. 2-4, 157-165, 2000.

7. Kaur, Parneet, Kristin J. Dana, Francisco A. Romero, and Nenad Gucunski, "Automated GPR rebar analysis for robotic bridge deck evaluation," IEEE Transactions on Cybernetics, Vol. 46, No. 10, 2265-2276, 2016.

8. Dou, Qingxu, Lijun Wei, Derek R. Magee, and Anthony G. Cohn, "Real-time hyperbola recognition and fitting in GPR data," IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing, Vol. 55, No. 1, 51-62, 2017.

9. Pasolli, Edoardo, Farid Melgani, and Massimo Donelli, "Automatic analysis of GPR images: A pattern-recognition approach," IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing, Vol. 47, No. 7, 2206-2217, 2009.

10. Wong, Phoebe Tin-Wai, Wallace Wai-Lok Lai, and Chi-Sun Poon, "Classification of concrete corrosion states by GPR with machine learning," Construction and Building Materials, Vol. 402, 132855, 2023.

11. Xu, Hong, Jie Yan, Guangliang Feng, Zhuo Jia, and Peiqi Jing, "Rock layer classification and identification in ground-penetrating radar via machine learning," Remote Sensing, Vol. 16, No. 8, 1310, 2024.

12. Xue, Wei, Kehui Chen, Ting Li, Li Liu, and Jian Zhang, "Efficient underground target detection of urban roads in ground-penetrating radar images based on neural networks," Remote Sensing, Vol. 15, No. 5, 1346, 2023.

13. Kandasamy, Lalitha and Shreya Reddy, "Deep learning algorithm for automatic breast tumour detection and classification from electromagnetic scattering data," Progress In Electromagnetics Research C, Vol. 128, 39-48, 2022.

14. Versaci, Mario, Giovanni Angiulli, Paolo Crucitti, Domenico De Carlo, Filippo Lagana, Diego Pellicanò, and Annunziata Palumbo, "A fuzzy similarity-based approach to classify numerically simulated and experimentally detected carbon fiber-reinforced polymer plate defects," Sensors, Vol. 22, No. 11, 4232, 2022.
doi:10.3390/s22114232

15. Iftimie, Nicoleta, Adriana Savin, Rozina Steigmann, and Gabriel Silviu Dobrescu, "Underground pipeline identification into a non-destructive case study based on ground-penetrating radar imaging," Remote Sensing, Vol. 13, No. 17, 3494, 2021.

16. Ganiyu, S. A., M. A. Oladunjoye, O. I. Onakoya, J. O. Olutoki, and B. S. Badmus, "Combined electrical resistivity imaging and ground penetrating radar study for detection of buried utilities in Federal University of Agriculture, Abeokuta, Nigeria," Environmental Earth Sciences, Vol. 79, 1-20, 2020.

17. Iftimie, N., A. Savin, N. A. Danila, and G. S. Dobrescu, "Radar pulses to image the subsurface using Ground Penetrating Radar (GPR)," IOP Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering, Vol. 564, No. 1, 012130, 2019.

18. Prego, F. J., M. Solla, I. Puente, and P. Arias, "Efficient GPR data acquisition to detect underground pipes," NDT & E International, Vol. 91, 22-31, 2017.

19. Benedetto, Andrea, Fabio Tosti, Luca Bianchini Ciampoli, and Fabrizio D'amico, "An overview of ground-penetrating radar signal processing techniques for road inspections," Signal Processing, Vol. 132, 201-209, 2017.

20. Saarenketo, Timo and Tom Scullion, "Road evaluation with ground penetrating radar," Journal of Applied Geophysics, Vol. 43, No. 2-4, 119-138, 2000.

21. Rasol, Mezgeen, Jorge C. Pais, Vega Pérez-Gracia, Mercedes Solla, Francisco M. Fernandes, Simona Fontul, David Ayala-Cabrera, Franziska Schmidt, and Hossein Assadollahi, "GPR monitoring for road transport infrastructure: A systematic review and machine learning insights," Construction and Building Materials, Vol. 324, 126686, 2022.

22. Torrione, Peter A., Kenneth D. Morton, Rayn Sakaguchi, and Leslie M. Collins, "Histograms of oriented gradients for landmine detection in ground-penetrating radar data," IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing, Vol. 52, No. 3, 1539-1550, 2013.

23. Liu, Hai, Chunxu Lin, Jie Cui, Lisheng Fan, Xiongyao Xie, and Billie F. Spencer, "Detection and localization of rebar in concrete by deep learning using ground penetrating radar," Automation in Construction, Vol. 118, 103279, Oct. 2020.

24. Ma, Xiao, Yangjia Li, and Jiaxing Song, "A stable auxiliary differential equation perfectly matched layer condition combined with low-dispersive symplectic methods for solving second-order elastic wave equations," Geophysics, Vol. 84, No. 4, T193-T206, 2019.

25. El Mahgoub, Khaled, Atef Z. Elsherbeni, and Fan Yang, "Dispersive periodic boundary conditions for finite-difference time-domain method," IEEE Transactions on Antennas and Propagation, Vol. 60, No. 4, 2118-2122, 2012.

26. Lu, Tiao, Pingwen Zhang, and Wei Cai, "Discontinuous Galerkin methods for dispersive and lossy Maxwell's equations and PML boundary conditions," Journal of Computational Physics, Vol. 200, No. 2, 549-580, 2004.

27. Warren, Craig, Antonios Giannopoulos, and Iraklis Giannakis, "gprMax: Open source software to simulate electromagnetic wave propagation for ground penetrating radar," Computer Physics Communications, Vol. 209, 163-170, 2016.

28. Howlader, Md. Omar Faruq and Tariq Pervez Sattar, "FDTD based numerical framework for ground penetrating radar simulation," Progress In Electromagnetics Research M, Vol. 44, 127-138, 2015.

29. Peplinski, Neil R., Fawwaz T. Ulaby, and Myron Craig Dobson, "Corrections to ``Dielectric properties of soils in the 0.3-1.3-GHz range''," IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing, Vol. 33, No. 6, 1340, 1995.

30. Giannopoulos, Antonis, "Modelling ground penetrating radar by gprMax," Construction and Building Materials, Vol. 19, No. 10, 755-762, 2005.

31. Ayala-Cabrera, David, Manuel Herrera, Joaquín Izquierdo, and Rafael Pérez-García, "Location of buried plastic pipes using multi-agent support based on GPR images," Journal of Applied Geophysics, Vol. 75, No. 4, 679-686, 2011.

32. Ahrens, James, Berk Geveci, and Charles Law, ParaView: An End-User Tool for Large-Data Visualization, 717-731, Butterworth-Heinemann, Burlington, 2005.

33. Soldovieri, Francesco, Ilaria Catapano, Pier Matteo Barone, Sebastian E. Lauro, Elisabetta Mattei, Elena Pettinelli, Guido Valerio, Davide Comite, and Alessandro Galli, "GPR estimation of the geometrical features of buried metallic targets in testing conditions," Progress In Electromagnetics Research B, Vol. 49, 339-362, 2013.

34. Gamba, Paolo and Simone Lossani, "Neural detection of pipe signatures in ground penetrating radar images," IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing, Vol. 38, No. 2, 790-797, 2000.

35. Talaat, Fatma M. and Hanaa Zain Eldin, "An improved fire detection approach based on YOLO-v8 for smart cities," Neural Computing and Applications, Vol. 35, No. 28, 20939-20954, 2023.

36. Yu, Hang, Jianguo Wang, Yaxiong Han, Bin Fan, and Chao Zhang, "Research on an intelligent identification method for wind turbine blade damage based on CBAM-BiFPN-YOLOV8," Processes, Vol. 12, No. 1, 205, 2024.

37. Chicco, Davide, Niklas Tötsch, and Giuseppe Jurman, "The Matthews correlation coefficient (MCC) is more reliable than balanced accuracy, bookmaker informedness, and markedness in two-class confusion matrix evaluation," BioData Mining, Vol. 14, No. 1, 1-22, 2021.

38. Gader, Paul D., Bruce N. Nelson, Hichem Frigui, Gary Vaillette, and James M. Keller, "Fuzzy logic detection of landmines with ground penetrating radar," Signal Processing, Vol. 80, No. 6, 1069-1084, 2000.

39. Dinh, Kien, Nenad Gucunski, and Trung H. Duong, "An algorithm for automatic localization and detection of rebars from GPR data of concrete bridge decks," Automation in Construction, Vol. 89, 292-298, 2018.

40. Wang, Yanhui, Guangyan Cui, and Jun Xu, "Semi-automatic detection of buried rebar in GPR data using a genetic algorithm," Automation in Construction, Vol. 114, 103186, 2020.

41. Maas, Christian and Jörg Schmalzl, "Using pattern recognition to automatically localize reflection hyperbolas in data from ground penetrating radar," Computers & Geosciences, Vol. 58, 116-125, 2013.

42. Ozkaya, Umut, Farid Melgani, Mesay Belete Bejiga, Levent Seyfi, and Massimo Donelli, "GPR B scan image analysis with deep learning methods," Measurement, Vol. 165, 107770, 2020.