Vol. 81
Latest Volume
All Volumes
PIERB 105 [2024] PIERB 104 [2024] PIERB 103 [2023] PIERB 102 [2023] PIERB 101 [2023] PIERB 100 [2023] PIERB 99 [2023] PIERB 98 [2023] PIERB 97 [2022] PIERB 96 [2022] PIERB 95 [2022] PIERB 94 [2021] PIERB 93 [2021] PIERB 92 [2021] PIERB 91 [2021] PIERB 90 [2021] PIERB 89 [2020] PIERB 88 [2020] PIERB 87 [2020] PIERB 86 [2020] PIERB 85 [2019] PIERB 84 [2019] PIERB 83 [2019] PIERB 82 [2018] PIERB 81 [2018] PIERB 80 [2018] PIERB 79 [2017] PIERB 78 [2017] PIERB 77 [2017] PIERB 76 [2017] PIERB 75 [2017] PIERB 74 [2017] PIERB 73 [2017] PIERB 72 [2017] PIERB 71 [2016] PIERB 70 [2016] PIERB 69 [2016] PIERB 68 [2016] PIERB 67 [2016] PIERB 66 [2016] PIERB 65 [2016] PIERB 64 [2015] PIERB 63 [2015] PIERB 62 [2015] PIERB 61 [2014] PIERB 60 [2014] PIERB 59 [2014] PIERB 58 [2014] PIERB 57 [2014] PIERB 56 [2013] PIERB 55 [2013] PIERB 54 [2013] PIERB 53 [2013] PIERB 52 [2013] PIERB 51 [2013] PIERB 50 [2013] PIERB 49 [2013] PIERB 48 [2013] PIERB 47 [2013] PIERB 46 [2013] PIERB 45 [2012] PIERB 44 [2012] PIERB 43 [2012] PIERB 42 [2012] PIERB 41 [2012] PIERB 40 [2012] PIERB 39 [2012] PIERB 38 [2012] PIERB 37 [2012] PIERB 36 [2012] PIERB 35 [2011] PIERB 34 [2011] PIERB 33 [2011] PIERB 32 [2011] PIERB 31 [2011] PIERB 30 [2011] PIERB 29 [2011] PIERB 28 [2011] PIERB 27 [2011] PIERB 26 [2010] PIERB 25 [2010] PIERB 24 [2010] PIERB 23 [2010] PIERB 22 [2010] PIERB 21 [2010] PIERB 20 [2010] PIERB 19 [2010] PIERB 18 [2009] PIERB 17 [2009] PIERB 16 [2009] PIERB 15 [2009] PIERB 14 [2009] PIERB 13 [2009] PIERB 12 [2009] PIERB 11 [2009] PIERB 10 [2008] PIERB 9 [2008] PIERB 8 [2008] PIERB 7 [2008] PIERB 6 [2008] PIERB 5 [2008] PIERB 4 [2008] PIERB 3 [2008] PIERB 2 [2008] PIERB 1 [2008]
2018-07-09
3D Indoor Localization through a Wireless Acoustic Sensor Networks
By
Progress In Electromagnetics Research B, Vol. 81, 123-139, 2018
Abstract
GPS is well recognized as the best procedure for outdoor localization. However, it presents limits in indoor localization due to particular geometric difficulties that necessitate specific solution to locate a target inside a building. Also, radio frequency technologies have many disadvantages in indoor localization. Bluetooth and Radio frequency Identification (RFID) are unsuitable for real-time localization because of latency. Ultra-wideband (UWB) localization needs an expensive hardware. Zigbee presents a high interference with wide range of signal frequency because it operates in unlicensed Industrial, Scientific and Medical ISM bands. Light waves also present some limitations due to interferencesfrom fluorescent light and sunlight. The IR based indoor system has expensive system hardware and maintenance cost. To overcome limits and non-availability of radio waves and light waves, an acoustic solution using an array of microphones is presented as a solution for indoor localization, and an optimized deployment is used to improve precision and restrain error. The aim of this work is to propose a 3D indoor audio localization approach inspired by the principle of functioning of the human ear. In order to achieve our goal, we will use a genetic algorithm to obtain the optimized deployment of the used hardware.
Citation
Nejah Nasri, Mansour Rached, Samia Chenini, and Abdennacer Kachouri, "3D Indoor Localization through a Wireless Acoustic Sensor Networks," Progress In Electromagnetics Research B, Vol. 81, 123-139, 2018.
doi:10.2528/PIERB18030705
References

1. Farrag, M., M. Abo-Zahhad, M. M. Doss, and J. V. Fayez, "Different aspects of localization problem for wireless sensor networks: A review," Int. J. Comput. Netw. Commun. Secur., Vol. 4, No. 5, 130-140, 2016.

2. Pahlavan, K., X. Li, and J. P. Makela, "Indoor geolocation science and technology," IEEE Communications Magazine, 112-118, Feb. 2002.
doi:10.1109/35.983917

3. Sfar, A. R., E. Natalizio, Y. Challal, and Z. Chtourou, "A roadmap for security challenges in the Internet of Things," Digital Communications and Networks, 1-20, 2017.

4. Vossiek, M., L. Wiebking, P. Gulden, J. Wiehardt, C. Hoffmann, and P. Heide, "Wireless local positioning," IEEE Microwave Mag., Vol. 4, No. 4, 77-86, Dec. 2003.
doi:10.1109/MMW.2003.1266069

5. Wang, K., A. V. Nirmalathas, C. Lim, K. Alameh, H. Li, and E. Skafidas, "Indoor infrared optical wireless localization system with background light power estimation capability," Optics Express Journal, Vol. 25, No. 19, Sep. 18, 2017.

6. Kalayci, T. E. and A. Ugur, "Genetic algorithm-based sensor deployment with area priority," International Journal of Cybernetics and Systems, Vol. 42, No. 8, 605-620, 2011.
doi:10.1080/01969722.2011.634676

7. Kassarwani, N., J. Ohri, and A. Singh, "Design and performance of dynamic voltage restorer using genetic algorithm," International Journal of Electronics, Vol. 105, No. 1, 88-103, 2017.
doi:10.1080/00207217.2017.1347828

8. Singh, S. P. and S. C. Sharma, "Genetic-Algorithm-Based Energy-Efficient Clustering (GAEEC) for homogenous wireless sensor networks," IETE Journal of Research, 1-12, 2017.
doi:10.1080/03772063.2017.1364981

9. Richard, R. F. and N. P. Arthur, "Introduction to sound source localization," Springer Handbook of Auditory Research, Vol. 25, Springer, New York, 2005.

10. Hightower, J. and G. Borriello, Location Systems for Ubiquitous Computing, Vol. 34, No. 8, 57-66, IEEE Computer Society Press, 2001.

11. Casas, R., D. Cuartielles, A. Marco, H. J. Gracia, and J. L. Falc, "Hidden issues in deploying an indoor location system," IEEE Pervasive Computing, Vol. 6, No. 2, 62-69, 2007.
doi:10.1109/MPRV.2007.33

12. Shimosaka, M., O. Saisho, T. Sunakawa, H. Koyasu, K. Maeda, and R. Kawajiri, "ZigBee based wireless indoor localization with sensor placement optimization towards practical home sensing," Journal of Advanced Robotics, Vol. 30, No. 5, Taylor & Francis, 2016.

13. Wang, F., X. Zhang, C. Wang, and S. Zhou, "Joint estimation of TOA and DOA in IR-UWB system using a successive propagator method," International Journal of Electronics, Vol. 102, No. 10, Taylor & Francis, 2015.

14. Shalaby, M., M. Shokair, and N. W. Messiha, "Performance enhancement of TOA localized wireless sensor networks," Springer Wireless Personal Communications, Vol. 95, No. 4, 4667-4679, Aug. 2017.
doi:10.1007/s11277-017-4112-8

15. Hayward, G. and Y. Gorfu, "A digital hardware correlation system for fast ultrasonic data acquisition in peak power limited applications," IEEE Transactions on Ultrasonics, Ferroelectrics, and Frequency Control, Vol. 35, No. b, Nov. 1988.

16. Aznoli, F. and N. J. Navimipour, "Deployment strategies in the wireless sensor networks: Systematic literature review," Classification, and Current Trends, Springer Wireless Personal Communications, Vol. 95, No. 2, 819-846, Jul. 2017.
doi:10.1007/s11277-016-3800-0

17. Yaro, A. S., M. J. Musa, S. Sani1, and A. Abdulaziz, "3D position estimation performance evaluation of a hybrid two reference TOA/TDOA multilateration system using minimum configuration," International Journal of Traffic and Transportation Engineering, Vol. 5, No. 4, 96-102, 2016.

18. Chen, C., Y. Chen, H. Q. Lai, Y. Han, and K. J. R. Liu, "High accuracy indoor localization: A WiFi-based approach," IEEE International Conference on Acoustics, Speech and Signal Processing (ICASSP), 2016.

19. Zhang, D., L. T. Yang, M. Chen, S. Zhao, M. Guo, and Y. Zhang, "Real-time locating systems using active RFID for internet of things," IEEE Systems Journal, Vol. 10, No. 3, 1226-1235, 2016.
doi:10.1109/JSYST.2014.2346625

20. Gu, Y., A. Lo, and I. Niemegeers, "A survey of indoor positioning systems for wireless personal networks," IEEE Commun. Surv. Tutor, Vol. 11, No. 1, 13-32, 2009.
doi:10.1109/SURV.2009.090103

21. Uradzinski, M., H. Guo, X. Liu, and M. Yu, "Advanced indoor positioning using zigbee wireless technology," Wireless Personal Communications, Vol. 97, No. 4, 6509-6518, Dec. 2017.
doi:10.1007/s11277-017-4852-5

22. Piontek, H., M. Seyffer, and J. Kaiser, "Improving the accuracy of ultrasound-based localisation systems," Personal and Ubiquitous Computing, Vol. 11, No. 6, 439-449, Aug. 2007.
doi:10.1007/s00779-006-0096-1

23. Lascio, E. D., A. Varshney, T. Voigt, and C. P. Penichet, "Localight: A battery-free passive localization system using visible light: Poster abstract," Proceedings of the 15th International Conference on Information Processing in Sensor Networks, 60, IEEE Press, 2016.

24. Oppermann, I., M. Hamalainen, and J. Iinatti, UWB: Theory and Applications, John Wiley & Sons, 2005.

25. Niu, R. and P. K. Varshney, "Joint detection and localization in sensor networks based on local decisions," IEEE Fortieth Asilomar Conference on Signals, Systems and Computers (ACSSC’06), 2006.

26. Ciuonzo, D., P. Salvo Rossi, and P. Willett, "Generalized Rao test for decentralized detection of an uncooperative target," IEEE Signal Processing Letters, Vol. 24, No. 5, 678-682, 2017.
doi:10.1109/LSP.2017.2686377

27. Ciuonzo, D. and P. Salvo Rossi, "Quantizer design for generalized locally-optimum detectors in wireless sensor networks," IEEE Wireless Communications Letters, 2017.

28. Ciuonzo, D. and P. Salvo Rossi, "Distributed detection of a non-cooperative target via generalized locally-optimum approaches," Information Fusion, Vol. 36, 261-274, 2017.
doi:10.1016/j.inffus.2016.12.006

29. Nakamura, M., M. Sugimoto, T. Akiyama, and H. Hashizume, "3D FDM-PAM: Rapid and precise indoor 3D localization using acoustic signal for smartphone," UBICOMP ’14 ADJUNCT, 123-126, Seattle, WA, USA, Sep. 13–17, 2014.

30. Mandal, A., C. Lopes, T. Givargis, A. Haghighat, R. Jurdak, and P. Baldi, "Beep: 3D indoor positioning using audible sound," Proc. Consumer Communications and Networking Conference (CCNC), 348-353, 2005.

31. Xu, B., R. Yu, G. Sun, and Z. Yang, "Whistle: Synchronization-free TDOA for localization," 31st International Conference on Distributed Computing Systems (ICDCS’11), 760-769, 2011.

32. Tung, Y. C. and K. G. Shin, "EchoTag: Accurate infrastructure-free indoor location tagging with smartphones," Proceedings of the 21st Annual International Conference on Mobile Computing and Networking (MobiCom’15), 525-536, 2015.
doi:10.1145/2789168.2790102