volume | PIER Journals

Abstract

Objective: As well known, using a single body worn sensor exposimeter introduces systematic errors on the measurement of the incident free space electric field strength. This is because the body creates around it high, intermediate and low level field zones, which depend on the direction of arrival of the incident field. The goal of this work is to propose an efficient method for the reduction of these errors. Methods: After classifying the perturbations induced by the body on the measured electric and magnetic fields thanks to realistic numerical simulations, we then propose a two-sensor setup in conjunction with simple semi-empirical correction formulas, in order to compensate these perturbations. Results: At 942 MHz, when the two sensors are placed in any opposite sides of the body at chest height, the worst case, maximum and average errors respectively decrease to 12% and 3% compared to 83% and 22% for measurement techniques using a single sensor, or 32% and 11% when using the average value of the measurements. Conclusion: The error related to the measurement in the presence of the body was significantly reduced by the proposed method making use of two opposite sensors, E-field and H-field at the chest. Significance: The conformity of exposure to EMF in terms of reference values according to the ICNIRP is given in the abscence of the human body. The interest of this work lies in the reduction of the errors made when measuring the field in the presence of the body.

1. ICNIRP "Guidelines for limiting exposure to time-varying electric, magnetic and electromagnetic fields (up to 300 GHz)," Health Physics, Vol. 74, No. 4, 494-522, 1998.

2. De Miguel-Bilbao, S., J. Garca, V. Ramos, and J. Blas, "Assessment of human body influence on exposure measurements of electric field in indoor enclosures," Bioelectromagnetics, Vol. 36, No. 2, 118-132, 2015.
doi:10.1002/BEM.21888

3. De Miguel-Bilbao, S., V. Ramos, and J. Blas, "Assessment of polarization dependence of body shadow effect on dosimetry measurements in 2.4 GHz band," Bioelectromagnetics, Vol. 38, No. 4, 315-321, 2017.
doi:10.1002/bem.22030

4. Krzysztof, G., Z. Patryk, and K. Jolanta, "The role of the location of personal exposimeters on the human body in their use for assessing exposure to the electromagnetic field in the radiofrequency range 982450 MHz and compliance analysis: Evaluation by virtual measurements," BioMed Research International, Vol. 2015, 2015.

5. Iskra, S., R. McKenzie, and I. Cosic, "Monte carlo simulations of the electric field close to the body in realistic environments for application in personal radiofrequency dosimetry," Radiation Protection Dosimetry, Vol. 147, No. 4, 517, 2011.
doi:10.1093/rpd/ncq580

6. Gallastegi, M., M. Guxens, A. Jim’enez-Zabala, I. Calvente, M. Fern’andez, L. Birks, B. Struchen, M. Vrijheid, M. Estarlich, M. F. Fern’andez, M. Torrent, F. Ballester, J. J. Aurrekoetxea, J. Ibarluzea, D. Guerra, J. Gonz’alez, M. Roosli, and L. Santa-Marina, "Characterisation of exposure to non-ionising electromagnetic fields in the spanish inma birth cohort: Study protocol," BMC Public Health, Vol. 16, No. 1, 167, 2016.
doi:10.1186/s12889-016-2825-3

7. Cansiz, M., T. Abbasov, M. Bahattin Kurt, and A. Recai Celik, "Mapping of radio frequency electromagnetic field exposure levels in outdoor environment and comparing with reference levels for general public health," J. Expos. Sci. Environ. Epidemiol., Original Article, Nov. 2016.

8. Neubauer, G., S. Cecil, W. Giczi, B. Petric, P. Preiner, J. Frhlich, and M. Rsli, "The association between exposure determined by radiofrequency personal exposimeters and human exposure: A simulation study," Bioelectromagnetics, Vol. 31, No. 7, 535-545, 2010.
doi:10.1002/bem.20587

9. Roblin, C. and A. Sibille, "Measurement of a body-worn triaxial sensor for electromagnetic field and exposure assessment," 2014 8th European Conference on Antennas and Propagation (EuCAP), 2631-2635, Apr. 2014.
doi:10.1109/EuCAP.2014.6902362

10. Blas, J., F. A. Lago, P. Fernndez, R. M. Lorenzo, and E. J. Abril, "Potential exposure assessment errors associated with body-worn RF dosimeters," Bioelectromagnetics, Vol. 28, No. 7, 573-576, 2007.
doi:10.1002/bem.20355

11. Bahillo, A., J. Blas, P. Fernndez, R. M. Lorenzo, S. Mazuelas, and E. J. Abril, "E-field assessment errors associated with RF dosemeters for different angles of arrival," Radiation Protection Dosimetry, Vol. 132, No. 1, 51-56, 2008.
doi:10.1093/rpd/ncn275

12. Iskra, S., R. McKenzie, and I. Cosic, "Personal, non-invasive dosimetry for radio-frequency human exposure assessment," 2007 29th Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society, 2319-2322, Aug. 2007.
doi:10.1109/IEMBS.2007.4352790

13. Thielens, A., H. De Clercq, S. Agneessens, J. Lecoutere, L. Verloock, F. Declercq, G. Vermeeren, E. Tanghe, H. Rogier, R. Puers, L. Martens, and W. Joseph, "Personal distributed exposimeter for radio frequency exposure assessment in real environments," Bioelectromagnetics, Vol. 34, No. 7, 563-567, 2013.

14. Weiland, T., "A discretization method for the solution of maxwells equations for six-component fields," Electronics and Communications AEU, Vol. 31, No. 3, 116-120, 1977.

15. Clemens, M. and T. Weiland, "Discrete electromagnetism with the finite integration technique," Progress In Electromagnetics Research, Vol. 32, 65-87, 2001.
doi:10.2528/PIER00080103

16. Petoussi-Henss, N., M. Zankl, U. Fill, and D. Regulla, "The GSF family of voxel phantoms," Physics in Medicine and Biology, Vol. 47, No. 1, 89, 2002.
doi:10.1088/0031-9155/47/1/307

17. Iskra, S., R. McKenzie, and I. Cosic, "Factors influencing uncertainty in measurement of electric fields close to the body in personal rf dosimetry," Radiation Protection Dosimetry, Vol. 140, No. 1, 25-33, 2010.
doi:10.1093/rpd/ncp309

18. Kwate Kwate, R., B. Elmagroud, C. Taybi, D. Picard, and A. Ziyyat, "Interaction between human body and personal radiofrequency dosimeter: Effects of the metal plate presence," Proc. IEEE 14th Edition of the Mediterranean Microwave Symposium MMS14, Marrakech, Morocco, Dec. 12-14, 2014.

19. Kwate Kwate, R., B. Elmagroud, C. Taybi, V. Beauvois, Ch. Geuzaine, D. Picard, and A. Ziyyat, "On calibration of correction law for EMF measurement errors due to the proximity of the human body," Proc. IEEE 15th edition of the Mediterranean Microwave Symposium MMS15, 1-4, Lecce, Italy, 2015.

20. Elmagroud, B., R. Kwate Kwate, C. Taybi, D. Picard, and A. Ziyyat, "Electromagnetic exposure assessment for telecommunication equipements using RF dosimeter," Proc. IEEE 2nd International Conference on Information Technology for Organizations Development, IT4OD-2016, Fez, Morocco, 2016.

Mr. Rodrigues Kwate Kwate

Dr. Chakib Taybi

Dr. Bachir Elmagroud

Dr. Veronique Beauvois

Prof. Christophe Geuzaine

Dr. Dominique Picard

Dr. Abdelhak Ziyyat