Vol. 11
Latest Volume
All Volumes
PIERB 105 [2024] PIERB 104 [2024] PIERB 103 [2023] PIERB 102 [2023] PIERB 101 [2023] PIERB 100 [2023] PIERB 99 [2023] PIERB 98 [2023] PIERB 97 [2022] PIERB 96 [2022] PIERB 95 [2022] PIERB 94 [2021] PIERB 93 [2021] PIERB 92 [2021] PIERB 91 [2021] PIERB 90 [2021] PIERB 89 [2020] PIERB 88 [2020] PIERB 87 [2020] PIERB 86 [2020] PIERB 85 [2019] PIERB 84 [2019] PIERB 83 [2019] PIERB 82 [2018] PIERB 81 [2018] PIERB 80 [2018] PIERB 79 [2017] PIERB 78 [2017] PIERB 77 [2017] PIERB 76 [2017] PIERB 75 [2017] PIERB 74 [2017] PIERB 73 [2017] PIERB 72 [2017] PIERB 71 [2016] PIERB 70 [2016] PIERB 69 [2016] PIERB 68 [2016] PIERB 67 [2016] PIERB 66 [2016] PIERB 65 [2016] PIERB 64 [2015] PIERB 63 [2015] PIERB 62 [2015] PIERB 61 [2014] PIERB 60 [2014] PIERB 59 [2014] PIERB 58 [2014] PIERB 57 [2014] PIERB 56 [2013] PIERB 55 [2013] PIERB 54 [2013] PIERB 53 [2013] PIERB 52 [2013] PIERB 51 [2013] PIERB 50 [2013] PIERB 49 [2013] PIERB 48 [2013] PIERB 47 [2013] PIERB 46 [2013] PIERB 45 [2012] PIERB 44 [2012] PIERB 43 [2012] PIERB 42 [2012] PIERB 41 [2012] PIERB 40 [2012] PIERB 39 [2012] PIERB 38 [2012] PIERB 37 [2012] PIERB 36 [2012] PIERB 35 [2011] PIERB 34 [2011] PIERB 33 [2011] PIERB 32 [2011] PIERB 31 [2011] PIERB 30 [2011] PIERB 29 [2011] PIERB 28 [2011] PIERB 27 [2011] PIERB 26 [2010] PIERB 25 [2010] PIERB 24 [2010] PIERB 23 [2010] PIERB 22 [2010] PIERB 21 [2010] PIERB 20 [2010] PIERB 19 [2010] PIERB 18 [2009] PIERB 17 [2009] PIERB 16 [2009] PIERB 15 [2009] PIERB 14 [2009] PIERB 13 [2009] PIERB 12 [2009] PIERB 11 [2009] PIERB 10 [2008] PIERB 9 [2008] PIERB 8 [2008] PIERB 7 [2008] PIERB 6 [2008] PIERB 5 [2008] PIERB 4 [2008] PIERB 3 [2008] PIERB 2 [2008] PIERB 1 [2008]
2008-12-03
EMC Model-Based Test-Setup of an Electrical System
By
Progress In Electromagnetics Research B, Vol. 11, 133-154, 2009
Abstract
The increased number of electronic systems in today's car designs requires that each system is EMC compliant prior to vehicle assembly. Each system or component auto supplier is mandated to perform system level EMC testing according to the car manufacturer standards. To ensure high functional integrity of these systems, EMC modeling and simulation are used as a tool. This paper provides an EMC model of a general automotive electrical system. The purpose is to measure, model, and simulate radiated emissions of a test-setup that consists of an electronic control unit ECU, harness, and a load. The model then can be used to optimize the overall system design to achieve EMC compliance or provide a directional improvement to obtain an optimum performance to save cost. Lab measurements are conducted and EMC model is developed according to CISPR25 standards. The model of the printed circuit board PCB and cable harness is accomplished using modeling tools with built-in modeling techniques such as 2D MoM and 3D PEEC. IBIS wave models and SPICE models are connected to simulate circuits and harnesses in time or frequency domain. During simulation, the geometric and electric data are stored together for radiation analysis.
Citation
Imad Sharaa, Daniel N. Aloi, and Hans Peter Gerl, "EMC Model-Based Test-Setup of an Electrical System," Progress In Electromagnetics Research B, Vol. 11, 133-154, 2009.
doi:10.2528/PIERB08110307
References

1. Hurst, G., A. Stelzer, and J. Runnells, "Design for compliance: It's about time [and money!]," Proceedings of IEEE Electromagnetic Compatibility International Symposium, 630-634, Santa Clara, CA, Aug. 2004.

2. Wu, T., Electromagnetic Compatibility: EMC Requirement for Electronic Systems, University of Central Florida.

3. Hubing, T., J. Drewniak, T. Drewniak, T. van Doren, and N. Kashyap, "An expert system approach to EMC modeling," Proceedings of IEEE Electromagnetic Compatibility International Symposium, 200-203, Santa Clara, CA, Aug. 1996.

4. Neumayer, R., A. Stelzer, F. Haslinger, J. Held, F. Schinco, and R. Weigel, "Continuous simulation of system-level automotive EMC problems," Proceedings of IEEE Electromagnetic Compatibility International Symposium, 409-413, Boston, MA, Aug. 2003.

5. Neumayer, R., A. Stelzer, F. Haslinger, G. Steinmair, M. Troscher, J. Held, B. Unger, and R. Weigel, "Numerical EMC simulation for automotive applications," Proceedings of IEEE Electromagnetic Compatibility International Symposium, 459-464, Zurich, Switzerland, Feb. 2003.

6. Haslinger, F., B. Unger, R. Weigel, M. Maurer, and M. Troscher, "EMC modeling of nonlinear components for automotive applications," Proceedings of IEEE Electromagnetic Compatibility International Symposium, 419-424, Zurich, Switzerland, Feb. 2001.

7. Neumayer, R., A. Stelzer, and R. Weigel, "Equivalent circuit modeling using frequency-domain subspace system identification," Proceedings of IEEE Electromagnetic Compatibility International Symposium, 1066-1069, Istanbul, Turkey, May 2003.

8. Englmaier, A. and B. Scholl, "EMC modelling strategy for automotive applications," Int. SimLab User Conference 2000, Munich, Nov. 2000.

9. Noble, I. E., "Electromagnetic compatibility in the automotive environment," Science, Measurement and Technology, IEE Proceedings, 252-258, July 1994.

10. Calvet, S., C. Huet, J. Levant, C. Maro, J. Perrin, and E. Sicard, Cookbook for Integrated Circuit Electromagnetic Model (ICEM), Oct. 2001.

11. CISPR 25, International Electrotechnical Commission, 2nd edition, 2002-08.

12. Paul, C. R., Introduction to Electromagnetic Compatibility, New York, 1992.

13. Gubisch, R., Why 50% of Products Fail EMC Testing the First Time, Intertek Testing Services NA, Inc.